He has some decent videos, but basically what he does is just fullfil white supremacist desires and attract racist people. I've read his comment section and for each african comment there are 10 from non-African talking about skin and iq, and saying how the creator is "the exception" and needs to be protected.

He talks a lot about "Why africa is poor", "why blacks don't innovate", etc, just talking about the bad side, not giving solutions, not giving space for the others "different" like him to talk to and create better solutions, he doesn't talk about all of innovations we had, despite limited access to other technology. He talks like africa is just a bunch of dumb people walking all day long seeking for western help because we can't save us.

Every single time this guy talks about a problem, the reason is "the culture, the biology and the fact they are african", it doesn't talk about African countries that he doesn't consider "black enough", because the racists who watch him won't like it. He has millions of views, just to talk shit.

He doesn't talk about structural problems, he doesn't talk about how not having a good perspective of life makes people "less serious", etc.

I've noticed an annoying pattern in online discussions about modern resource extraction, foreign contractors, and regional conflict in places like the DRC, West Africa, and the Sahel.

When people talk about the problems facing their countries today, whether it's foreign military contractors, multinational companies extracting resources, or violence fueled by outside interests, the conversation often gets sidetracked. Instead of discussing the issue itself or showing empathy for the people affected, the response quickly turns into historical point-scoring.

"What were your ancestors doing 300 years ago?"

"What did your civilization accomplish 1,000 years ago?"

It creates a troubling double standard in which people are expected to defend the accomplishments of their ancestors before their present-day concerns are taken seriously. Yet a nation's right to peace, sovereignty, and self-determination should not be contingent on historical prestige or civilizational achievements.

The real question is not how to win arguments with people who are determined not to listen. The real question is how we redirect that energy toward building stronger institutions, greater self-reliance, and a more secure future for the next generation.

For months, observers debated whether former president Joseph Kabila was truly aligning himself with the AFC and M23 rebels in the eastern DRC. Some dismissed it as political gossip or Kinshasa propaganda.

This exclusive interview with Paul Kagame on Jeune Afrique, published on April 3, 2026, completely removes all doubt. It stands as the clearest smoking gun we have seen.

When the journalist directly asks Kagame if Kabila got a green light from the Rwandan government to operate in Goma and coordinate with the rebels, Kagame does not deny it. Between 18:43 - 20:06, Kagame says:

"I would be happy to ensure that those who want to come and be part of the eastern Congo that belong there or belong to Congo and want to be part of the struggle to get a stable Congo, I would welcome them. It doesn't have to be Kabila, but we're talking about Kabila. Kabila made his own choice... You know how the government, the current government, has been running after him or has prosecuted him or has sentenced him to death or maybe taken over some of his assets or whatever they did. So how does this person say he wants to confront this situation in his country and I refuse him passage? How, what sense would it make?"

Listen carefully to what is being said here. The president of a neighboring country is openly admitting that he granted passage to a former Congolese president so he could join an armed rebellion operating on Congolese soil.

There is no longer any debate about whether Rwanda is actively destabilizing the DRC. Kagame already admitted in the same interview at that Rwanda coordinates security with the M23, and at that Rwandan soldiers cross the border whenever they want.

This interview was the precursor to everything happening today. Kabila joining the rebellion is not a spontaneous local uprising. It is an organized campaign facilitated by Kigali, using an ambitious Congolese politician to provide political cover for an armed group that has terrorized the Kivus for years.

Recently i was reading a few articles on ebola in Congo, and wonder if outbreaks are gonna continue to re-occur, Congo has a large forest, and there is a lot of human/animal contact, added to that conflicts, lack of state resources.

What do u guys think?

* https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/health/3933456-why-congo-cant-escape-ebola-the-real-battle-against-poverty-and-weak-healthcare

* https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-funeral-politician-killed-1ff629474298a62db44438c6eb178270

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7Tos3ad-nI

Words and photos: Fatma Fahmy

Lake Qarun in Egypt’s Fayoum region formed about 70,000 years ago – one of the oldest lakes in the world. Fast-forward several thousands of years to when pharaonic-era engineers developed it into a reservoir by constructing canals to increase the flow of water.

In more recent history, the lake used to provide a livelihood for the people of Ezbet Soliman and nearby villages. It was a watery portal to love, companionship, and a whole way of life.

Over the past decades, that portal has slowly closed. When the Aswan High Dam was completed in 1970, the lake’s connection to the Nile River was cut.

The resultant increased salinity, untreated sewage, and agricultural runoff, polluted the water. Fish disappeared and the shoreline receded.

It felt as if closing the portal had left the community suspended between two worlds: land that had lost its water, and souls still searching for life.

This kind of environmental exploitation leaves its deepest marks on women. They are often the first members of a community to feel the pain when
nature collapses, but the last to abandon the land where they live.

In systems built on control and not care, women are left to carry the burden alone – they are the final bridge between crumbling land and its people. They are rarely seen as part of the solution.

But women’s stories are not important only for the suffering they surface. They are a way in – to understand how people hold grief and memory through place.

At its heart, the ecofeminist visual project When Absence Takes Hold asks: What is our relationship with the places we’ve lost? How do we carry memory in our bodies, in our gestures, in the silence we inherit? If you could write a letter to nature, what would you say?

I know my country is a very religious country(Kenya) but please don't come for me saying this. Religion doesn't and shouldn't be respected just because the majority follow it. I'm an ex believer and I no longer subscribe to the dogma (for a year now), but since I live with people who do around me, I have to pretend to. Cause if I dare say it, I'd risk losing my social community,any chance of getting a job or even my life. Yet the constitution explicitly states that the people have freedom of conscience, belief,thought, religion and opinion.

Most people across Africa have never heard of the letter Albert Einstein sent to American President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 2, 1939. In schoolbooks and movies, people talk about this letter as the start of the atomic age, where scientists were just trying to beat Hitler to the bomb.

​Hardly anyone on our continent is taught what was actually written on page two:

​The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia, while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo.

Understanding this single sentence is crucial, because it demonstrates that the nightmare of the DRC did not begin yesterday. It exposes roots stretching back nearly a century. Long before modern smartphones, electric vehicles, or coltan, global powers explicitly designated Congolese soil as the fuel for their technological and military hegemony.

The uranium Einstein talked about was in the Shinkolobwe mine in Katanga. While uranium found in the West was low quality, Congolese ore was the purest ever discovered. Congolese workers were forced by Belgian colonial masters to dig it up with their bare hands, with no protection from radiation. That Congolese uranium was used to make the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

From that moment on, foreign powers decided that an independent, strong Congo was a threat. When Patrice Lumumba wanted the country to control its own wealth, he was murdered. A dictator was put in place to keep the minerals flowing out for cheap while the people stayed poor.

Today, we are seeing the exact same foreign playbook in the eastern Congo: the old strategy of divide and conquer.

The real goal of foreign powers and their regional allies is to split the Congo apart. We have seen this before on our continent. Look at what was done to Sudan: they pushed and pushed until Sudan was divided into two countries, and both sides are still trapped in war and poverty. Look at what they tried to do in Mali, using armed groups to cut off the northern part of the country and create a fake state called Azawad.

In the eastern DRC, they want to do the exact same thing. If they can break the country or permanently cut off the Kivus and Katanga, foreign companies and regional bosses will never have to answer to a strong central government. They can just loot the coltan, gold, and cobalt without laws, taxes, or borders.

Sadly, our own politicians are helping them do it.

Joseph Kabila has now joined hands with the M23 rebels and Corneille Nangaa. People are shocked, but he is only playing the exact same broken record his father played thirty years ago.

Back in 1996, the presidents of Rwanda (Kagame) and Uganda (Museveni) wanted to invade the Congo to remove Mobutu. To hide that this was a foreign invasion, they needed a Congolese face. They picked Laurent-Desire Kabila, put him in front of their army, and marched into the country. That move started decades of wars that killed millions of innocent people.

Today, Joseph Kabila is doing the exact same thing his father did. Because he lost power to Felix Tshisekedi, he has teamed up with the very rebel group that has spent years killing, raping, and displacing his own people, all just to get back into power.

This shows how selfish our political class really is. On one side, you have Kabila and the rebels, backed by Kagame and Museveni, who act as regional servants for European interests in Brussels looking for cheap minerals. On the other side, you have Tshisekedi, who acts like a puppet for Washington and the American establishment, paying foreign lobbyists and relying on outside promises instead of building a real national army.

Neither side cares about the Congolese mother sleeping in the mud in a refugee camp. Neither side cares about the young boy digging cobalt with his bare hands. They are just competing against each other to show their foreign bosses who can be the most obedient puppet.

The plan to divide the Congo is happening right in front of our eyes, just like it was done in Sudan and attempted in Mali. The sad truth is that the innocent Congolese who are dying in this conflict are dying for absolutely nothing. They are not dying for freedom or for Congo. They are dying for the greed and egos of politicians who sold out their own people.

Boatman Yusuf Athman waits for passengers
in Lamu, Kenya. The island’s dhow boats, 12th-century Old Town and pristine beaches will soon have to reckon with an oil refinery, being built nearby by Nigerian tycoon Aliko Dangote.

Photo: Luis Tato/AFP

What's your opinion on the african leaders above?

Lumumba, Nkrumah, Sankara, Gaddafi, Nasser, Kagame and Mugabe

Some of them are portrayed very negatively by Western media, which is why I'm interested in understanding how Africans themselves view them

For context , formula 1 ( a world championship ) has never been to Africa in the last three decades , even more . It was announced that in 2030 the sport will return to the continent in form of a Grand Prix in Rwanda , which was great news for all fans.
But they decided to call it the “African” Grand Prix , instead of the Rwandan Grand Prix ; which I find horrible to be honest . It’s that same colonialist view lingering again after centuries and treating the second biggest continent in the world as one big jungle .
Thoughts ?

Hello everyone, I put together a map estimating the median monthly income across all 54 African countries.

Because finding standardized, recent data for the entire continent is challenging, I wanted to share the methodology, the data sources, and a breakdown of what these numbers actually reflect about our economic realities.

I also discuss the limitations of this data and the modeling approach at the end of the post.

Why the Median?

When discussing income, averages or means are heavily skewed by extreme wealth inequality. A high GDP per capita or a high average salary does not mean much for the typical citizen if the vast majority of that wealth is concentrated at the top.

The median represents the exact middle point where half the population makes more and half makes less. This provides a much more accurate picture of everyday economic realities, especially considering the massive scale of informal economies and agriculture across the continent.

Data Sources and Methodology

Because no single database tracks current median household income across every country, this data synthesizes two tiers of information to achieve full continental coverage.

​First, for the 14 countries with direct household survey coverage, the figures rely on the standardized global polling series aggregated by Gallup and World Population Review. These figures draw from rolling household survey waves administered between 2013 and 2022, depending on the country's latest validated national round.

​Second, for the remaining 40 countries where direct survey data is unavailable, macroeconomic proxies were calculated using the latest available World Bank Open Data and Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) indicators:

• Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (Atlas method, current USD) values reflect the most recent reported national accounts, primarily spanning the 2022 to 2024 reporting years.

• Gini inequality coefficients used for the discount factor come from the latest published World Bank household surveys, with reporting dates ranging between 2015 and 2023 depending on when each nation last conducted a comprehensive consumption and expenditure census. For countries without a recent national survey, the regional Sub-Saharan benchmark average of 43 was applied.

Map Ranges

• The $0 to $30 range includes countries like Burundi, Madagascar, and Burkina Faso. These numbers reflect economies that are predominantly agrarian and subsistence-level. In many of these nations, ongoing or recent instability has disrupted formal market growth. The vast majority of the population operates entirely outside the formal banking and wage system, meaning their monetary income is extremely low even if they generate daily agricultural value to survive.

• The $31 to $60 range includes countries like Uganda, Rwanda, Senegal, and Tanzania. This tier represents developing economies with emerging formal sectors. While these countries often boast strong macro-economic growth and heavy investments in infrastructure, the baseline reality is that most citizens are still engaged in informal trade or agriculture. The gap between the growing urban middle class and the rural majority remains wide.

• The $61 to $100 range includes regional powerhouses like Nigeria, Kenya, and Cote d'Ivoire. The relatively low median income here, despite high national wealth, perfectly illustrates why averages are misleading. High Gini coefficients in these countries show massive wealth inequality. Urban centers might have thriving formal sectors and high costs of living, but the sheer volume of the population means the median citizen still earns a fraction of the average GDP per capita.

• The $101 to $150 range includes countries like Egypt, Ghana, and South Africa. These economies generally have more established industrial, mining, or service sectors. South Africa is a prime example of the data's nuance: it is one of the wealthiest nations on the continent, but historical legacies of disenfranchisement have left it with one of the highest inequality rates in the world. The formal labor market is stronger, pushing the median up, but the economic hurdles for the typical citizen remain incredibly steep.

• The $151+ range includes nations like Mauritius, Seychelles, Algeria, and Gabon. This top tier is largely made up of specialized economies. Nations like Mauritius and Seychelles benefit from smaller populations and highly developed tourism and financial sectors. Meanwhile, countries like Gabon or Algeria leverage significant natural resource wealth spread over relatively smaller populations, which helps establish a much stronger baseline formal labor market and higher minimum wages.

Limitations

Before drawing absolute conclusions from the map, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this data. Converting everything to USD ignores Purchasing Power Parity, as fifty dollars goes much further in some local markets than in others. Furthermore, much of the continent relies on the informal economy, which is incredibly difficult to quantify in standard monetary surveys. Finally, relying on Gini coefficients as a proxy for the missing 40 countries is an economic heuristic, not a perfect substitute for actual on-the-ground census data.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this, especially how these numbers align with what you see on the ground in your respective countries.

GOMA, Congo (AP) — Former Congolese President Joseph Kabila on Monday launched a new political and military coalition of groups opposed to the current government, including the M23 rebels who have captured wide swaths of territory in eastern Congo.

Kabila’s new Front for the Refoundation of the Nation, or FRN, includes rebel groups formerly united under the Congo River Alliance, whose former leader Corneille Nangaa will serve as one of the new coalition’s four vice presidents.

Coalition adviser Claude Ibalanky said at a news conference late Monday at Kabila’s residence in the eastern city of Goma that the FRN’s mission is to restore the pillars of a functioning republic. It aims to “unite and coordinate all resistance forces in order to put an end to tyranny — by any means necessary, including the use of force,” Ibalanky said.

When I say African unity, I don't mean we all get together and become one big country and family and it's all kumbaya. That seems impossible since Africa is very diverse.

I mean a strong united African political and economic front founded on some level of mutual respect, a shared general history of exploitation and the desire to compete on the world stage.

That doesn't mean we have to LOVE each other (that'd be ideal but we don't live in a world of ideals)

That can be in any form,

Perhaps individualized blocs across the continent coming together: for example, West African's forming their own EU style bloc, the East doing so, the South etc and all of them coming together.

OR a reformed version of the AU

That's all besides the point, there is a myriad of practical reasons why this is hard to do but I want to nail down one reason as to why I stopped believing it's possible.

Many Africans across the continent just don't see it as necessary and or straight up don't like the idea of it.

As simple as that, I'd like to believe that change start's with the mindset of the common people and if the common people don't see something as necessary then it's not going to happen. This applies to democracies because your leader's are somewhat a reflection of the majority vote and this applies to dictatorships because dictators don't grow up in a vacuum. Many grow up amongst the people and grow up in the communities and cultures where ideas are spread.

I think a lot of African's don't want that unity, hate the idea and don't see it as necessary. It show's in various tribal conflicts, and I know when it comes down to it these conflicts are complicated but I see it in everyday conversations when someone goes "Man I don't like Nigerians, they're so [ insert bigoted opinion here], "Batswana are so [ insert bigoted opinion here], "Habesha's are so [ insert bigoted opinion here], "Zulu's are so [insert bigoted opinion here]", you get the gist, and it's with such vitriol. It's discouraging.

I though will always see any African as my brother and or sister, same applies to those in the diaspora. I will practice that in my personal life but I don't think African unity is possible any time soon because of the micro level we just seem so divided.

What do you guys think?

• Oryx Energies, a Swiss energy company focused on Africa, was acquired by its management team in a deal valued at approximately $1 billion.

• Chief executive Moussa Diao and trading manager Hervé Bouvet bought the majority stake from founder Jean-Claude Gandur.

• The company has significant infrastructure, including 410 service stations, over 890,000 cubic metres of storage, and key terminals, particularly in West Africa.

• The management buyout occurs amid rising global fuel prices, but leaves control of Oryx Energies with leaders who have long managed its operations.