It's 2026. Soon 2027. Most of the development is now done with LLM Assistants.
Some old and out of passion devs who haven't touched code in years don't know about it, but the profession nowadays is assisted by LLM.
Technophobes either deny or are ignorant to that fact. But the reality is here. From 2022 to early 2026, the participation in Stackoverflow has dropped by 99%. 99% !!
Devs who don't use any LLM for their code and solutions are, if we are kind, 5% of the people or less (and much less). That is the harsh reality.
Accept it or not, everyone uses it. Now, I can understand people frustration too. Which, initially, was legitimate, before it turned into this weird egregore of AI-hate. The famous Hivemind that infects more and more everyday. But I will still give credit to people's intent :
Initially, yes, people were right to be concerned. Nobody wants slop. Nobody wants to see something they love turn into some mess, and lose the very nature of what they are attached to. People don't want slop, don't want low quality, and especially don't want Serial-sloppers who spawn slop left and right thinking it'll be the new hit : Yes this is annoying.
So what can we do about it? We might want to look at the substance behind the process. Is this mod actually good, does it offer something good, is it interesting, is the code quality, etc.
Who's able to produce good quality, no matter the tool they use? Someone who clearly has knowledge of what they are doing, both in computer engineering and LLM use, if they use one.
Should we keep standard? Of course. Should we remind people that the slop leads nowhere? Also yes.
But should we witch hunt someone who assists their work with a powerful tool such as current frontier LLM? You guys know the tool is good. Devs know the tool is good. Obviously, it is just a tool that will do what you ask it to do. If your method of building is bad, it won't give a good result. So where's the middle ground?
I'd say, let's be honest: Most devs use it. But also non-devs use it. Which make it more complex than simply saying "all AI sucks!" because, let me remind you, most platforms use AI. Devs at Discord use AI, devs at [enter company name] most likely use AI. those people know what they're doing. Assuming that a dev, magically, loses every clue of what they're doing from the second they touch an AI tool is ridiculous.
But also, obviously, it does open the gate for some nonsense, and that is where people should be conscious and careful. The "bottom entry" has lowered, to a point anyone can do something with the current LLM Frontier technology.
We should lead ourselves to a point where we understand a difference in a product by looking at the product. In the past, using LLM was in most of the cases gonna result in bad code. This is not true anymore. It is still true for larger code-bases unless there is an engineering human mind behind with experience.
What is true tho, is that people don't become geniuses, randomly, as soon as they prompt through LLM. So even if the possibility of what they can build is higher, it doesn't mean they'll reach there, most people ideas are just not the best especially when they want to do it quickly with AI. And I'm all for criticizing the result when it's fair and honest.
But this has existed for a long time. People who don't bring quality to their creation is older than AI is.
Thank you for listening to my ted talk