One thing I’ve noticed among people who support rejoining the EU is how sheepish some seem to be about what kind of deal Britain could negotiate.
It’s almost always said that because we voted to leave, we’d have to go back with our tails between our legs and accept whatever terms we’re offered.
But why is that? I could be wrong, but I genuinely believe the UK could negotiate a deal very close to what we previously had. And I actually think there’s an argument that the EU could benefit even more from Britain rejoining than Britain itself.
Think about what the EU would regain. One of Europe’s largest economies, London as a global financial centre, a world leader in science and research, one of Europe’s strongest armed forces, a nuclear power and a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. They are not small things. That’s an enormous amount of economic, diplomatic and military influence to bring back into the EU.
And I’m not saying the EU potentially benefiting more than us is a reason not to rejoin. I’m
Actually saying the opposite. If both sides benefit enormously, then surely that’s the whole point right?
I understand the EU has rules, and I’m not suggesting we’d automatically get our old deal back. But negotiations work both ways, and in my opinion the U.K. still has plenty to offer.
Polling suggests many people now believe Brexit was a mistake. But acknowledging Brexit was a mistake doesn’t mean we have to pretend the U.K. is now some insignificant country with nothing to negotiate with. It actually annoys me how it’s framed. I believe a lot of rejoiners have become so focused on what the U.K. lost, they have forgotten the EU also lost a significant part of its set up too.
Should we be far more bullish about what Britain brings to the table, rather than assuming we’d have to accept an inferior deal before negotiations have even begun?