​

To start, shes spreading misinformation about Chance. No, hes not in the hospital and hasnt been since March. So that claim was just a blatant lie.

Second, there are people in the comments genuinely saying, had she had been allowed to abort Chance, she wouldve lived. Another blatant lie that could've been disproven had you have actually researched Adriana's story. Adriana had suffered brain clots that doctors determined was catastrophic and declared her brain-dead. No abortion of Chance at this point wouldve brought her back. Period. Theres no telling whether or not the clots in her brain were caused by pregnancy either, so even if she wouldve aborted Chance prior to her death, she could've still very well have died either way.

To add on to that, abortion wouldnt have even happened after Adriana's death anyway. She wouldve been pulled from life support, which wouldve allowed Chance to die.

Prochoicers care so much about this woman and her baby that they dont even care to research about them and their story, and then go onto spread misinformation about them.

Adriana Smith was brain dead. What led to her death was entirely unrelated to her pregnancy - it was medical negligence. She wasn’t kept on life support because of an abortion ban either, but Georgia's Advance Directive for Health Care Act of 2007, which mandates that pregnant women be kept on life support if they have no advance directive saying they want to be.

Also fuck the „baby Chance is without his mother“ pulling on heartstrings bullshit. If pro choicers had gotten their way Chance would’ve been violently murdered in the womb, and now they’re acting like they care about his emotional well being??? To justify legislation that would kill babies just like him?????

Anyway, this post was about upcoming abortion ballot measures in Idaho, Missouri, Nevada and Virginia in November. For Virginia I believe it’s question 1, which would create a constitutional right to „reproductive freedom“, in Nevada it’s question 6, which would would amend the state’s constitution to establish a constitutional right to abortion until fetal viability, in Idaho, Proposition 1 would create a statutory right to make „private reproductive healthcare decisions“.

In Missouri, it’s actually a more pro life law. Amendment 3 would remove abortion as a constitutional right, and would ban it with exceptions for medical emergencies, fatal fetal anomalies, and in cases of rape or incest before 12 weeks. It would also restrict gender affirming care for minors.

If you live in any of these states, vote if you can.

These types of arguments are so dumb to me. They act like we should allow humans to be murdered because it would be unpractical to legislate… that sounds a lot like the arguments used to justify ALL other types of human rights violations throughout history.

I’m sure there were people arguing to keep slavery legal because it would be unpractical to free them. People argued women shouldn’t vote or have rights for the same reasons I’m sure.

And the argument that you can be anti abortion but want the government out of it?? So ridiculous. Do they hear how dumb this argument is? imagine if someone said “yeah I’m anti rape but the government should stay out of it”… like what?

Gotta love talking to prochoice people

I appreciate the pro-life advocacy org in my area. I’ve only come to a few meetings and don’t know if I want to do advocacy with them or not, but it’s nice to have a place to share my thoughts. But they’re still very much a religious organization and use religious language when they talk about certain things. I have no problem with religion and religious beliefs, but I definitely feel like an outsider as someone raised atheist who’s basically never been to church. I don’t believe I need to be religious to be pro-life, but I do wish I could meet other non-religious pro-life individuals. I don’t know though.