r/philosophy • • Jul 01 '25

Modpost Welcome to /r/philosophy! Check out our rules and guidelines here. [July 1 2025 Update]

44 Upvotes

Welcome to /r/philosophy!

Welcome to /r/philosophy! We're a community dedicated to discussing philosophy and philosophical issues. This post will go over our subreddit rules and guidelines that you should review before you begin posting here.

Table of Contents

  1. /r/philosophy's mission
  2. What is Philosophy?
  3. What isn't Philosophy?
  4. /r/philosophy's Posting Rules
  5. /r/philosophy's Commenting Rules
  6. Miscellaneous Posting and Commenting Guidelines
  7. No Self-Posts Allowed
  8. Frequently Asked Questions
  9. /r/philosophy's Self-Promotion Policies
  10. A Note about Moderation

/r/philosophy's Mission

/r/philosophy strives to be a community where everyone, regardless of their background, can come to discuss philosophy. This means that all posts should be primarily philosophical in nature. What do we mean by that?

What is Philosophy?

As with most disciplines, "philosophy" has both a casual and a technical usage.

In its casual use, "philosophy" may refer to nearly any sort of thought or beliefs, and include topics such as religion, mysticism and even science. When someone asks you what "your philosophy" is, this is the sort of sense they have in mind; they're asking about your general system of thoughts, beliefs, and feelings.

In its technical use -- the use relevant here at /r/philosophy -- philosophy is a particular area of study which can be broadly grouped into several major areas, including:

  • Aesthetics, the study of beauty
  • Epistemology, the study of knowledge and belief
  • Ethics, the study of what we owe to one another
  • Logic, the study of what follows from what
  • Metaphysics, the study of the basic nature of existence and reality

as well as various subfields of 'philosophy of X', including philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of science and many others.

Philosophy in the narrower, technical sense that philosophers use and which /r/philosophy is devoted to is defined not only by its subject matter, but by its methodology and attitudes. Something is not philosophical merely because it states some position related to those areas. There must also be an emphasis on argument (setting forward reasons for adopting a position) and a willingness to subject arguments to various criticisms.

What Isn't Philosophy?

As you can see from the above description of philosophy, philosophy often crosses over with other fields of study, including art, mathematics, politics, religion and the sciences. That said, in order to keep this subreddit focused on philosophy we require that all posts be primarily philosophical in nature, and defend a distinctively philosophical thesis.

As a rule of thumb, something does not count as philosophy for the purposes of this subreddit if:

  • It does not address a philosophical topic or area of philosophy
  • It may more accurately belong to another area of study (e.g. religion or science)
  • No attempt is made to argue for a position's conclusions

Some more specific topics which are popularly misconstrued as philosophical but do not meet this definition and thus are not appropriate for this subreddit include:

  • Drug experiences (e.g. "I dropped acid today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Mysticism (e.g. "I meditated today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Politics (e.g. "This is why everyone should support the Voting Rights Act")
  • Self-help (e.g. "How can I be a happier person and have more people like me?")
  • Theology (e.g. "Here's how Catholic theology explains transubstantiation")

/r/philosophy's Posting Rules

In order to best serve our mission of fostering a community for discussion of philosophy and philosophical issues, we have the following rules which govern all posts made to /r/philosophy:

PR1: All posts must be about philosophy.

To learn more about what is and is not considered philosophy for the purposes of this subreddit, see our FAQ. Posts must be about philosophy proper, rather than only tangentially connected to philosophy. Exceptions are made only for posts about philosophers with substantive content, e.g. news about the profession, interviews with philosophers.

PR2: All posts must develop and defend a substantive philosophical thesis.

Posts must not only have a philosophical subject matter, but must also present this subject matter in a developed manner. At a minimum, this includes: stating the problem being addressed; stating the thesis; anticipating some objections to the stated thesis and giving responses to them. These are just the minimum requirements. Posts about well-trod issues (e.g. free will) require more development.

PR3: Questions belong in /r/askphilosophy.

/r/philosophy is intended for philosophical material and discussion. Please direct all questions to /r/askphilosophy. Please be sure to read their rules before posting your question on /r/askphilosophy. Please be aware that /r/askphilosophy does not allow test-my-theory posts, or questions about people's personal opinions or self-help.

PR4: Post titles cannot be questions and must describe the philosophical content of the posted material.

Post titles cannot contain questions, even if the title of the linked material is a question. This helps keep discussion in the comments on topic and relevant to the linked material. Post titles must describe the philosophical content of the posted material, cannot be unduly provocative, click-baity, unnecessarily long or in all caps.

PR5: Audio/video links require abstracts.

All links to either audio or video content require abstracts of the posted material, posted as a comment in the thread. Abstracts should make clear what the linked material is about and what its thesis is. Users are also strongly encouraged to post abstracts for other linked material. See here for an example of a suitable abstract.

PR6: All posts must be in English.

All posts must be in English. Links to Google Translated versions of posts, translations done via AI or LLM, or posts only containing English subtitles are not allowed.

PR7: Links behind paywalls or registration walls are not allowed.

Posts must not be behind any sort of paywall or registration wall. If the linked material requires signing up to view, even if the account is free, it is not allowed. Links to Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneNote are not allowed. All links must be full urls; link shorteners are not allowed. All broken links will be removed.

PR8: Self-posts, meta-posts, products, services, surveys, cross-posts and AMAs are not allowed.

The following (not exhaustive) list of items are not allowed: self-posts, meta-posts, posts to products, services or surveys, cross-posts to other areas of reddit, AMAs. Please contact the moderators for pre-approval via modmail.

PR9: Users may submit only one post per day and no more than three posts per week.

Users may never post more than one post per day or three posts per week (i.e. seven-day period). Users must follow all reddit-wide spam guidelines, in addition to the /r/philosophy self-promotion guidelines.

PR10: Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract.

/r/philosophy is not a mental health subreddit. Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract here. If you or a friend is feeling suicidal please visit /r/suicidewatch. If you are feeling suicidal, please get help by visiting /r/suicidewatch or using other resources. See also our discussion of philosophy and mental health issues here. Encouraging other users to commit suicide, even in the abstract, is strictly forbidden.

PR11: No AI-created/AI-assisted material allowed.

/r/philosophy does not allow any posts or comments which contain or link to AI-created or AI-assisted material, including text, audio and visuals. All posts or comments which contain AI material will result in a ban.

PR12: Links must be related to the topic of discussion.

/r/philosophy does not allow self-posts. Posting an unrelated link to get around the restriction on self-posts will result in a ban.


/r/philosophy's Commenting Rules

In the same way that our posting rules above attempt to promote our mission by governing posts, the following commenting rules attempt to promote /r/philosophy's mission to be a community focused on philosophical discussion.

CR1: Read/Listen/Watch the Posted Content Before You Reply

Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.

CR2: Argue Your Position

Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.

CR3: Be Respectful

Comments which consist of personal attacks will be removed. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Slurs, racism, and bigotry are absolutely not permitted.

CR4: No AI-created/AI-assisted material allowed.

/r/philosophy does not allow any posts or comments which contain or link to AI-created or AI-assisted material, including text, audio and visuals. All posts or comments which contain AI material will result in a ban.


Miscellaneous Posting and Commenting Guidelines

In addition to the rules above, we have a list of miscellaneous guidelines which users should also be aware of:

  • Reposting a post or comment which was removed will be treated as circumventing moderation and result in a permanent ban.
  • Posts and comments which flagrantly violate the rules, especially in a trolling manner, will be removed and treated as shitposts, and may result in a ban.
  • Once your post has been approved and flaired by a moderator you may not delete it, to preserve a record of its posting.
  • No reposts of material posted within the last year.
  • No posts of entire books, articles over 50 pages, or podcasts/videos that are longer than 1.5 hours.
  • Posts which link to material should be posted by submitting a link, rather than making a self-post/text post. Please see here for a guide on how to properly submit links.
  • Harassing individual moderators or the moderator team will result in a permanent ban and a report to the reddit admins.

No self-posts allowed.

/r/philosophy no longer allows self-posts, and is restricted to link posts to material published elsewhere. The vast, vast majority of self-posts (over 95% of the last 12 month period) failed to meet our posting rules, and represent the largest amount of moderation work for the already overloaded moderation team. All self-posts will now be automatically removed and directed elsewhere with an automated message.

Do you have a philosophical question?

As per PR3, questions are not allowed on /r/philosophy. Please direct philosophical questions to /r/askphilosophy; questions about other issues or academic fields should be directed to an appropriate subreddit.

Do you have a piece of philosophical writing or argument you would like to share?

Either post a link to your philosophical writing or state your argument as a top-level comment in our weekly Open Discussion Thread (ODT), which will always be stickied at the top of the subreddit just under the rules and guidelines. You can see past ODTs by filtering with the post flair, or by clicking here.

Don't have your own website to link to? There are a number of free options, including Medium and Substack. Note that as per PR7, links to Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneNote are not allowed. Note that we no longer require self-promotion registration from all people posting their own material; see the self-promotion guidelines below for more details.

Do you want to start a philosophical discussion with others?

Start your discussion as a top-level comment in our weekly Open Discussion Thread (ODT), which will always be stickied at the top of the subreddit just under the rules and guidelines. You can see past ODTs by filtering with the post flair, or by clicking here.


Frequently Asked Questions

Below are some frequently asked questions. If you have other questions, please contact the moderators via modmail (not via private message or chat).

My post or comment was removed. How can I get an explanation?

Almost all posts/comments which are removed will receive an explanation of their removal. That explanation will generally by /r/philosophy's custom bot, /u/BernardJOrtcutt, and will list the removal reason. Posts which are removed will be notified via a stickied comment; comments which are removed will be notified via a reply. If your post or comment resulted in a ban, the message will be included in the ban message via modmail. If you have further questions, please contact the moderators.

How can I appeal my post or comment removal?

To appeal a removal, please contact the moderators (not via private message or chat). Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible. Reposting removed posts/comments without receiving mod approval will result in a permanent ban.

How can I appeal my ban?

To appeal a ban, please respond to the modmail informing you of your ban. Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible.

My comment was removed or I was banned for arguing with someone else, but they started it. Why was I punished and not them?

Someone else breaking the rules does not give you permission to break the rules as well. /r/philosophy does not comment on actions taken on other accounts, but all violations are treated as equitably as possible.

I found a post or comment which breaks the rules, but which wasn't removed. How can I help?

If you see a post or comment which you believe breaks the rules, please report it using the report function for the appropriate rule. /r/philosophy's moderators are volunteers, and it is impossible for us to manually review every comment on every thread. We appreciate your help in reporting posts/comments which break the rules.

My post isn't showing up, but I didn't receive a removal notification. What happened?

Sometimes the AutoMod filter will automatically send posts to a filter for moderator approval, especially from accounts which are new or haven't posted to /r/philosophy before. If your post has not been approved or removed within 24 hours, please contact the moderators.

My post was removed and referred to the Open Discussion Thread. What does this mean?

The Open Discussion Thread (ODT) is /r/philosophy's place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but do not necessarily meet our posting rules (especially PR2). For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Your own philosophical writing that you don't want to host on a separate website
  • Arguments that aren't substantive enough to meet PR2
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • Philosophical questions

If your post was removed and referred to the ODT, it likely meets PR1 but did not meet PR2, and we encourage you to consider posting it to the ODT to share with others.

My comment responding to someone else was removed, as well as their comment. What happened?

When /r/philosophy removes a parent comment, it also removes all their child comments in order to help readability and focus on discussion.

I'm interested in philosophy. Where should I start? What should I read?

As explained above, philosophy is a very broad discipline and thus offering concise advice on where to start is very hard. We recommend reading this /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ post which has a great breakdown of various places to start. For further or more specific questions, we recommend posting on /r/askphilosophy.

Why is your understanding of philosophy so limited?

As explained above, this subreddit is devoted to philosophy as understood and done by philosophers. In order to prevent this subreddit from becoming /r/atheism2, /r/politics2, or /r/science2, we must uphold a strict topicality requirement in PR1. Posts which may touch on philosophical themes but are not distinctively philosophical can be posted to one of reddit's many other subreddits.

Are there other philosophy subreddits I can check out?

If you are interested in other philosophy subreddits, please see this list of related subreddits. /r/philosophy shares much of its modteam with its sister-subreddit, /r/askphilosophy, which is devoted to philosophical questions and answers as opposed to discussion. In addition, that list includes more specialized subreddits and more casual subreddits for those looking for a less-regulated forum.

A thread I wanted to comment in was locked but is still visible. What happened?

When a post becomes unreasonable to moderate due to the amount of rule-breaking comments the thread is locked. /r/philosophy's moderators are volunteers, and we cannot spend hours cleaning up individual threads.


/r/philosophy's Self-Promotion Policies

/r/philosophy allows self-promotion, but only when it follows our guidelines on self-promotion.

All self-promotion must adhere to the following self-promotion guidelines, in addition to all of the general subreddit rules above:

  • As of July 1 2025, accounts engaging in self-promotion do not need to register for self-promotion before posting.
  • You may not post promote your own content in the comments of other threads, including the Open Discussion Thread.
  • You may not post any AI-generated material. Any content which is AI-created or AI-assisted, including but not limited to text, audio and visuals, will result in a full and permanent ban of your account and website.
  • All links to your own content must be submitted as linked posts (see here for more details).
  • You may not repost your own content until after 1 year since its last submission, regardless of whether you were the person who originally submitted it.
  • You may not use multiple accounts to submit your own content. You may choose to switch to a new account for the purposes of posting your content by contacting the moderators.
  • No other account may post your content. All other users' posts of your content will be removed, to avoid doubling up on self-promotion. Directing others to post your material is strictly forbidden and will result in a permanent ban.
  • In line with PR9 above, no more than three links to your content can be posted to /r/philosophy in any week.
  • All posts must meet all of our standard posting rules. Any violation of any of our standard posting rules or guidelines found in this post or elsewhere on /r/philosophy may result in a full and permanent ban of your account and website.

You are responsible for knowing and following these policies, all of which have been implemented to combat spammers taking advantage of /r/philosophy and its users. If you are found to have violated any of these policies we may take any number of actions, including banning your account or platform either temporarily or permanently.

If you have any questions about the self-promotion policies, including whether a particular post would be acceptable, please contact the moderators before submission.

Self-Promotion Flair

Accounts engaged in self-promotion for longer than six months on /r/philosophy may request self-promotion flair to indicate that they are the owners of the linked material. To do so, they must message the moderators with the subject 'Self-Promotion Flair', including all of the following:

  • A link to your relevant platforms (e.g. Substack, YouTube)
  • A link to the initial date of self-promotion on /r/philosophy confirming you have been participating for more than six months
  • A short name we can use to flair your posts to identify you as the poster (e.g. real name, website name, channel name or blog name)

As of July 1 2025, we do not require you register to self-promote on /r/philosophy. Registration is purely optional and only for those who desire to have a flair next to their name to indicate they are the author of the content. A lack of registration or flair does not release you from the general subreddit rules or guidelines, or the self-promotion guidelines.

Acknowledgement of receipt of registration and approval may take up to two weeks on average; if you have not received an approval or rejection after two weeks you may respond to the original message and ask for an update.


A Note about Moderation

/r/philosophy is moderated by a team of dedicated volunteer moderators who have spent years attempting to build the best philosophy platform on the internet. Unfortunately, the reddit admins have repeatedly made changes to this website which have made moderating subreddits harder and harder. In particular, reddit has recently announced that it will begin charging for access to API (Application Programming Interface, essentially the communication between reddit and other sites/apps). While this may be, in isolation, a reasonable business operation, the timeline and pricing of API access has threatened to put nearly all third-party apps, e.g. Apollo and RIF, out of business. You can read more about the history of this change here or here. You can also read more at this earlier post on our subreddit.

Our moderator team relies heavily on these tools which will now disappear. Moderating /r/philosophy is a monumental task; over the past year we have flagged and removed over 20000 posts and 23000 comments. This is a huge effort, especially for unpaid volunteers, and it is possible only when moderators have access to tools that these third-party apps make possible and that reddit doesn't provide.

These changes have radically altered our ability to moderate this subreddit, which resulted in a few changes for this subreddit. First, moderation will occur much more slowly; as we will not have access to mobile tools, posts and comments which violate our rules will be removed much more slowly, and moderators will respond to modmail messages much more slowly. Second, from this point on we will require people who are engaging in self-promotion to reach out and register with the moderation team, in order to ensure they are complying with the self-promotion policies above. Third, and finally, if things continue to get worse (as they have for years now) moderating /r/philosophy may become practically impossible, and we may be forced to abandon the platform altogether. We are as disappointed by these changes as you are, but reddit's insistence on enshittifying this platform, especially when it comes to moderation, leaves us with no other options. We thank you for your understanding and support.


r/philosophy • • 5d ago

Open Thread /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 12, 2026

15 Upvotes

Welcome to this week's Open Discussion Thread. This thread is a place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but wouldn't necessarily meet our posting rules (especially posting rule 2). For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Arguments that aren't substantive enough to meet PR2.

  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. who your favourite philosopher is, what you are currently reading

  • Philosophical questions. Please note that /r/askphilosophy is a great resource for questions and if you are looking for moderated answers we suggest you ask there.

This thread is not a completely open discussion! Any posts not relating to philosophy will be removed. Please keep comments related to philosophy, and expect low-effort comments to be removed. All of our normal commenting rules are still in place for these threads, although we will be more lenient with regards to commenting rule 2.

Previous Open Discussion Threads can be found here.


r/philosophy • • 7h ago

The birth of antiquity within living memory: threads of memory, images, and interpretation in Nolan’s The Odyssey

Thumbnail medium.com
23 Upvotes

The essay offered here was first conceived as a study of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, one in which cinema would take precedence. In the course of the work it became a text around the film, a philosophical construction that the film illustrates while serving as its material. Its conceptual foundation was laid by ideas from my book The Aesthetics of Decay, which contains an implicit theory of the image and raises the problems of interpretation, of perception in their relation to poetry.

The return does take place in the film. Odysseus reaches Ithaca and takes back his home, yet something still keeps the story from ending. The space dividing the hearths of the oikoumene and the time separating an act from its meaning can be overcome in the end, since the sea can be crossed and the years waited out until the denouement.

In my view, what resists is a third dimension, the depth of what was done, the most fragile and still the one with the strongest hold on people. Neither distance nor the lapse of ages can touch it, and yet it lives only while it is spoken of. Silence alone is enough for it to dissipate, like any ideal.

The essay’s main theses:

  1. The duration of an image’s appearing demands offerings. The event is over, and for its image to go on appearing it needs the present, which it spends on itself. The essay compresses this into a formula: “The feast eats through the house, triumph through lives, the song’s refrain through the meaning of victory.” Behind it lie three ways of devouring: the feast exhausts the material basis of life, triumph takes the future from the victors, condemned to live inside the consequences of their own victory, and finally the song, repeating the story of victory, little by little strips it of historical and moral determinacy. Repetition sustains the image and exhausts it at once. In the bard’s refrain the word “thought” stays in place, though it turns from praise of cunning into the first link in a chain of crimes. The image screens off memory and facts, building perspectives in which the account a person has accepted seems to leave nothing out. And it acts on time from another level. Past and future are bound together, and the order of that bond is set by the image, which rewrites the future and, through it, grounds the past. The suitors on Ithaca feast day after day, and it seems to prepare an occasion for itself, a wedding or a wake, at which Odysseus’s indefinite absence will turn into a confirmed death. Once such a future arrives, it will certify the past after the fact, and the effect will take the place of the cause.
  2. The point of departure is a ruin, the trace of a disintegrated order that each narrator builds out in their own way. By a ruin I mean a broken-off piece facing backward. It stands in two times at once, holding on to a vanished whole while it goes on crumbling, so its stillness is only apparent, for a ruin is a movement we have managed to see. Fragments of the past could be stitched together organically if the structure that gathered values into one were still intact. That structure has come apart, and the past reaches people as a conflict of interpretations in which each imagines the lost whole from within their own present. The ruins of Troy serve as the allegory of this ruin, and Odysseus, in effect, left his home there as well - in the ashes. A ruin endures at the expense of the living. Whoever destroyed it later keeps its remains and in the end becomes the very material from which the past goes on existing. What survives is what can be carried along. Homer’s marriage bed is rooted in the soil of Ithaca; in contrast - in Nolan's film the sign of home becomes a fibula that travels the whole way with Odysseus. A thing, a promise, a rule, and memory hold such a home together as long as their meaning stays clear to those who keep them.
  3. Antiquity sets in while its eyewitnesses are still alive. Once that meaning is forgotten, the past slips away before the witnesses are gone. The participants are still alive, yet the war is already remembered as a legend whose shape is set in the teller’s mouth. Its edifying note is secondary and barely voiced, and the legend stays open to additions that adjust how it is received. The image takes shape gradually, saturated with details, and for some these become the cornerstones of their way of seeing, so that each goes on thinking a single facet of it without grasping the whole. Antiquity here turns out to be a myth about the past and about the future as well, since contemporaries have no time to inherit what they lived through and rework it for the sake of what is to come. For Jan and Aleida Assmann, communicative memory holds the recent past for three or four generations before it passes into cultural memory. In the film this passage happens within a single generation, and what decides it is access and the way communication between people is arranged. Thucydides distinguished the stated occasion of a war from its truest cause. Carry that distinction over to antiquity itself, and it turns out that antiquity is born of lost access to the recent past, which needs no millennia.
  4. A sign can lie while keeping its familiar form, and tell the truth by taking on a foreign meaning. A world without archives holds together through signs, and much depends on whether they can be trusted. The essay describes shared rules as hollow forms filled with content by belief, and the trust they inspire opens the way to the worst treachery. Such too is the Trojan horse, the chief composite sign. A symbol of goodwill, of atonement for transgressions, and also a sign of betrayal. It is two-faced in content and in form alike, because the hollow that faith fills for those who accept the gift is occupied, inside, by an ambush. When the divine guarantors are gone, guilt concentrates on whoever knew the rule. A sign tells the truth in the most unexpected way. In Homer, the journey with the oar is to end where a passerby takes the oar for a winnowing fan, and a misrecognition becomes a true omen. There are also signs that no one reads. Helen, the symbol of the war’s cause, receives incomparably little attention at Menelaus’s feast compared with the way her image is sung, however the scar on her face goes unread. An image can never be embodied in reality the way it is told. Oversaturated and extraordinary, it is unbearable for reality and exists at the level of narrative, drawing its monumentality from the simultaneity of the tellings, for when many keep saying the same thing about something, people come to believe it even if things stand otherwise. This is why the human being cannot measure up to his own image. Agamemnon finds no place in his own triumph, and Antinous, who invented a past for himself, vanishes into that fiction.
  5. The sightless remember. The feasters look past Helen, and in this world sight generally sits uneasily with knowledge. In Memoirs of the Blind, Derrida observed that the draftsman traces the line from memory, no longer seeing the model, and the film seems to entrust memory to those who do not see. Nolan takes Eumaeus’s sight away, though in Homer he can see, and leaves him the memory of other people’s fates, and blind Tiresias shows Odysseus the way home. With the sighted, things are more complicated. Menelaus is blinded by the myth of his own victory and breaks off his story, sure that everyone knows the rest. Such is memory screened off by an image. Odysseus himself throws a veil over his past, and it comes back to him in flashes of pain. In Homer, tears break through that veil when, at the Phaeacian court, blind Demodocus sings of the horse and Odysseus weeps over his own deeds. For Derrida, the eye is destined to weep rather than to see.
  6. Poetry lives within forgetting. What, then, remains of the past if the sighted turn away from it? The last chapter answers with song. Forgetting threatens here from two sides. The Sirens promise an exhaustive knowledge after which there is nowhere left to return, and Calypso’s lotus grants the chance to remember nothing anymore. The living song holds its ground between them. It is incomplete and changes in other mouths, and so in time it may forget even how victory differed from crime. The crime then stays in it - in its allotted place, troubling no one.
  7. The interpreter does not stand outside the process being described. The song’s incompleteness extends to any account of it, mine included. The frame is Eco’s intentio operis, the structure of a finished work that limits interpretation. The film itself interprets Homer and shows from within how interpretations take shape: in Nolan, six perspectives argue over the outcome of the war, and a seventh, tied to Helen, calls its cause into question. I do what my characters and singers do, stitching scattered testimonies into a story without hoping for fullness, and the essay itself works as ekphrasis, setting the film before the reader’s eyes in words. In the finale the spectator takes the place the Olympians have left and surveys more than any hero can, yet still looks with the same human eyes, and I do not exclude myself from this.

The essay has six chapters, and each answers the initial question in its own way, forcing a revision of the answer before it. Over the course of this movement Odysseus gradually ceases to be the center, and in the finale his place is taken by the song, an image he can no longer measure up to, one able to outlive the hero and forget his guilt. I am most interested in objections to two ideas: that antiquity can set in within living memory, and that repetition both preserves an image and exhausts it.


r/philosophy • • 1d ago

Blog Philosopher and AI researcher Paul de Font-Reaulx argues that even if computation lies at the heart of human cognition, phenomenology need not be identical to it. This undercuts a key assumption used in arguments for machine consciousness, especially in LLMs.

Thumbnail onhumans.substack.com
196 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 1d ago

You better start believing in philosophical thought experiments, because you’re living in one [Article about the teletransporter problem and how it relates to the development of life extension technologies]

Thumbnail neurobiology.substack.com
4 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 2d ago

Video Déjà Vu & The Metaphysics of Virtual Time

Thumbnail youtu.be
49 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 2d ago

Blog How To Pull An Ought From An Is: Hegel’s Being to Ought

Thumbnail epochemagazine.org
34 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 21h ago

AI May Force Us to Rethink Our Identity as a Species

Thumbnail pipes101.substack.com
0 Upvotes

For millenia, humans have considered ourselves to be uniquely and fundamentally rational animals. Purportedly, this conferred on us special status, placing us at the apex of a hierarchy of beings. AI contests this picture. More specifically, due to uncertainty surrounding the possibilities of digital intelligence, the primary conclusion of this piece should be stated as a conditional: if AI currently or in the future possess rationality, then this challenges our identity as a species, forcing us to reconsider our status as uniquely rational beings atop the hierarchy of beings. This reconsideration of our species-identity frees us to explore alternative conceptions of human nature and the possibility of treating non-human animals more humanely.


r/philosophy • • 1d ago

Video Video: From Atheism to Multiverse Pantheism

Thumbnail youtube.com
0 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 4d ago

Blog The absent self and the fictional author

Thumbnail epochemagazine.org
57 Upvotes

Signification is only possible thanks to the lacking of a substantial base


r/philosophy • • 4d ago

Video The Case of Christa Pike: A discussion at the intersection of capital punishment and medical ethics.

Thumbnail youtube.com
6 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 4d ago

Blog Nietzsche: Enchanting Ideas, Morbid Morals, How They Can Be Separated

Thumbnail zachsuffish.substack.com
19 Upvotes

Would love for Any nietzsche readers or those interested to check this out!


r/philosophy • • 5d ago

Blog Philosophy Born of Struggle | Vincent Lloyd looks at the mood that best fits the elderly and finds not only declining faculties, but also stubbornness, playfulness, & the wisdom that comes from familiarity with struggle. The philosopher’s tasks is to explicate struggle.

Thumbnail thephilosopher1923.org
53 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 7d ago

Blog Act Such That You Are Willing to Relive The Interaction from Perspective of All Those Involved

Thumbnail pipes101.substack.com
262 Upvotes

Combining ideas from Nietzsche and MacAskill leads to the following ethical standard: we should strive to act such that we would be willing to relive the interaction from the perspective of all those involved. This principle encourages us to adopt the perspective of others, thereby engaging in a radical practice of empathy that respects the wellbeing, dignity, and uniqueness of each person we interact with. Next, turning to political philosophy, a similar standard – strive to create a society such that you would be willing to successively live the life of all persons in that society – preserves some of the key insights of Rawls’s original position and veil of ignorance, while also avoiding some objections to this imaginary decision-procedure.


r/philosophy • • 8d ago

Paper AI Should be Considered as a Problem for Social Philosophy

Thumbnail paris.pias.science
234 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 8d ago

Blog The Five Problems of Generality

Thumbnail philosophyquacks.substack.com
10 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 11d ago

Podcast Podcast: Why videogames don’t make you violent (but do affect you in other ways)

Thumbnail buzzsprout.com
210 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 11d ago

Podcast Marshall Abrams discusses the nature of the evolutionary process on Elucidations

Thumbnail elucidations.vercel.app
19 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 12d ago

Article [PDF] Vice signaling is not the opposite of virtue signaling, but a subset of virtue-signaling actions

Thumbnail jesp.org
140 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 13d ago

Video why music isn't just a question of taste

Thumbnail youtube.com
33 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 13d ago

Blog The Mythology Of Conscious AI | NOEMA

Thumbnail noemamag.com
55 Upvotes

r/philosophy • • 13d ago

Article [PDF] Famine, affluency and morality

Thumbnail rintintin.colorado.edu
25 Upvotes

Singer, 1972


r/philosophy • • 13d ago

Blog Schmittian Sovereignty and the Safety State: Deconstructing Thiel's Night 1 Lecture

Thumbnail danielforresternash.substack.com
11 Upvotes

Most public analysis of modern tech accelerations focuses on immediate market or safety mechanics. However, evaluating the political theology driving figures like Peter Thiel requires mapping a specific 19th and 20th century intellectual cannon: Vladimir Solovyov's Short Story of the Antichrist (where the Antichrist functions as a hyper-realistic, safety-obsessed administrator), Rene Girard's mimetic theory, and Carl Schmitt's sovereign exception.

In this framework, the existential risk vector isn't a traditional tyrant or a mad scientist, but a centralizing safety apparatus that uses risk management to enforce total technological and civilizational stagnation. The administrative state becomes a sovereign gatekeeper that pacifies political tension by declaring itself the sole authority on risk.

I wrote a longer essay directing the mechanics of this framework as it was presented during night 1 of his Antichrist lectures in Nashville. It examines where this synthesis of political theology holds up as a diagnostic took for AI governance, and where it intentionally omits structural theorists like Beck (Risk Society) and Habermas.

Interested to hear how this sub evaluates the application of the Schmittian sovereign exception to modern regulatory capture. Does viewing safety regimes through a political theology lens provide genuine diagnostic utility or does it simply rebrand standard regulatory friction into eschatology?

https://danielforresternash.substack.com/p/what-night-one-left-out


r/philosophy • • 14d ago

Video Note to Self

Thumbnail youtube.com
19 Upvotes

According to Aurelius, everything is already predetermined, but you can still choose how to respond. He wants to have his cake and eat it too: you can’t have a deterministic universe and, at the same time, free choice in your response, since the response ultimately influences that same universe


r/philosophy • • 17d ago

Video Nietzsche argued that philosophy since Plato has focused on metaphysical beyond-worlds that distract from the material. With the death of God, metaphysics died too, and the question of suffering asks itself anew. The Übermensch is Nietzsche's answer

Thumbnail youtu.be
134 Upvotes