I’ve long been taught that “unique” is an absolute adjective. The rule says something is either one-of-a-kind or it is not; you cannot be “very one-of-a-kind”. So “very unique” should be wrong.
But lately I keep seeing “very unique” in reputable publications, blog posts and even published fiction. Example:
- This is a very unique opportunity.
- Her perspective is very unique within the field.
I understand the argument: when writers say “very unique”, they usually don’t mean strictly “the only one in existence”. They mean “unusual, distinctive, standing out from most others”. It’s a soft, weakened meaning of unique.
So now I’m confused about the practical standard. Prescriptively, it’s incorrect. Descriptively, it is widely used and understood by native readers.
My main question: when writing formally — essays, reports, professional emails — should I avoid “very unique” to keep strict editors happy? Or has this usage become standard enough that it no longer counts as a mistake?
Do native speakers notice and cringe when they read “very unique”? Or is the old rule just a leftover grammar myth these days? I’d love to hear your take, especially if you work as an editor or writing tutor.