r/grammar • • Nov 16 '25

A couple of reminders, and checking in with you all

53 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

I hope you're all doing well. It's been a while since I made a pinned post, and a couple of issues have come up recently, so I thought I'd mention those and also give you a chance to bring up anything else that you think needs attention.

First, we get a lot of questions about things that fall outside of the narrowest definition of "grammar," and there are usually a fair number of comments on these posts that point this out. But the vast majority of these questions are fine! As you can see from the sub description, rules, and FAQ articles, we adhere to a pretty broad definition of "grammar," and we welcome questions about style, punctuation, vocabulary, usage, semantics, pragmatics, and other linguistic subfields (and this is not an exhaustive list).

So when commenting on posts like this, there's no need to say "This isn't about grammar" or to direct the OP to another subreddit - if the question has anything to do with language or orthography, it's probably appropriate for the sub. I remove any posts that are not, and you can also report a post if you think it really doesn't fit here.

One thing we don't do is proofread long pieces of writing (r/Proofreading is a good place for that), but we do welcome specific questions about short pieces of writing (a paragraph, a few random sentences, a piece of dialogue, etc.). And that brings me to the second issue:

We ask that commenters take into account the genre (e.g., fiction, journalism, academic writing) and register (the type of language used in a particular genre) of the writing that the poster is asking about. We get a lot of questions about creative writing, but some of the feedback given on these posts is more suited to very formal genres. For example, while you would probably advise someone to avoid sentence fragments in academic writing, these are not usually inappropriate in creative writing (used wisely, of course). Another thing to bear in mind is that punctuation conventions are generally more flexible in less formal genres. And for some genres, it may be necessary to consult an appropriate style guide in order to answer the OP's question.

So basically, please make sure to tailor your responses to the type of writing in question.

Thanks so much!

- Boglin007


r/grammar • • Apr 02 '23

Important: Re answers generated by ChatGPT and other AI programs

153 Upvotes

Update 5/24/26: Also prohibited are posts promoting the use of AI/LLMs to aid in language learning/grammar checking, and posts asking for comparisons of AI programs/LLMs, etc.

Hi everyone,

There has been a recent increase in comments using ChatGPT or other AI programs to answer questions in this sub. Unfortunately, these programs are not at all reliable when it comes to grammar questions (or any questions really). Some regular contributors to r/grammar have discussed the shortcomings of AI programs (mostly ChatGPT) - they have given me permission to use the quotes below (but have asked to remain anonymous):

OpenAI says ChatGPT was released in order to "get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weaknesses." The prompt page warns users that ChatGPT "may occasionally generate incorrect information" and "may occasionally produce harmful instructions or biased content.”

ChatGPT's goal is to learn to produce speech equivalent to, and indistinguishable from, that of a human. ChatGPT's current goal is not to become a reliable source of information. (If that were its goal, they would allow it to access the huge libraries of information it is connected to. But that is not the current research goal.) ー I believe they have set it to occasionally make small mistakes, intentionally, in order to assess how the public reacts to these occasional errors (does the public blindly believe them/if the public challenges ChatGPT on these errors, can the program successfully handle these challenges well?).

And here is an example of an incorrect (or at the very best, incomplete/misleading) answer that ChatGPT gave to a pretty straightforward grammar question:

The question: “Should I use ‘that’ or ‘which’ in the following sentence?: ‘This is the house that/which I like.’”

ChatGPT’s answer:

Both "that" and "which" can be used in this sentence, but the choice depends on whether the information following the word is essential or non-essential to the sentence.

If the information is essential to the sentence and needed to identify the specific house you like, use "that". For example, "This is the house that I like" implies that there are other houses and you are identifying which one you like.

If the information is non-essential and simply provides additional information about the house, use "which". For example, "This is the house, which I like" implies that there is only one house and you are adding a comment about it.

So, in this case, if you want to emphasize that this particular house is the one you like, use "that". If you want to add an additional comment about the house, use "which".

The correct/complete answer:

Both “that” and “which” are grammatically correct in that sentence as written (without a comma) because without the comma, the relative clause is integrated, and both “that” and “which” can be used in integrated relative clauses. However, “that” will be strongly preferred in American English (both “that” and “which” are used about equally in integrated relative clauses in British English).

If you were to add a comma before the relative clause (making it supplementary), only “which” would be acceptable in today’s English.

ChatGPT also fails to mention that integrated relative clauses are not always essential to the meaning of the sentence and do not always serve to identify exactly what is being talked about (though that is probably their most common use) - it can be up to the writer to decide whether to make a relative clause integrated or supplementary. A writer might decide to integrate the relative clause simply to show that they feel the info is important to the overall meaning of the sentence.

Anyway, to get to the point: Comments that quote AI programs are not permitted in this sub and will be removed. If you must use one of these programs to start your research on a certain topic, please be sure to verify (using other reliable sources) that the answer is accurate, and please write your answer in your own words.

Thank you!


r/grammar • • 10h ago

Nitch or neesh?

14 Upvotes

Just heard a senior reporter for Vox say "nitch". Now I'm wondering. A very popular word these days.


r/grammar • • 21m ago

What sounds better?

• Upvotes

I'm writing a short kids story about a stapler that's a monster.

Should I call it the Staple Monster or the Stapler Monster?

I kept thinking it was the Staple Monster, but it technically probably should be Stapler Monster!

Thanks!


r/grammar • • 2h ago

quick grammar check I'm very tired could you tell me if this makes sense

0 Upvotes

"Do you know, if it weren't for you in my life, I'd be a lightyear farther away from being myself " it's an expression from one person directly to another, the speaker is asking if the listener is aware that because of them the speaker is closer to more fully realized personhood and development. it's 2:30 in the morning, please and thank you for your help.


r/grammar • • 9h ago

Is my sentence correct?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

In the long-term, we don't have opportunities to prove the fact of fraud.


r/grammar • • 16h ago

Blend of honey(s)?

2 Upvotes

Hi all.

I’m working on a recipe with various honeys and I wondered if it should be a “blend of honey” or “blend of honeys”. Both sort of sound ok to me but perhaps there’s a grammatically correct answer.

Similarly I’m not sure if I follow it with “our blend of honey(s) is or are”.

Thanks so much!


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Best books about words

12 Upvotes

My favorite is The Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester. (Not a fan of Winchester’s “The Meaning of Everything.”)

Others:

Alphabet Juice — Roy Blount, Jr.

Reading the OED — Ammon Shea

Websterisms— Arthur Schulman

The Lexicon — William Buckley


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Why does English work this way? which one of these sentence is correct?

2 Upvotes

Hello everyone hope you have a good time. I'm B1+ learner and I'm not very good at writing English text. i always miss punctuation so sorry befor i ask my question.

I'd like to know which one of these sentence is correct and why? plus i would like to get comprehensive explanation.

"He speaks as fast as no can understand" "He speaks so fast that no one can understand"

please, give an detailed explanation about why the other sentence is incorrect


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Whatever will be will be.

0 Upvotes

"Whatever will be will be."

Is the "Whatever will be" a Subject and the following it "will be" a Predicator in the cited sentence?


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Is "very unique" actually acceptable in modern English?

8 Upvotes

I’ve long been taught that “unique” is an absolute adjective. The rule says something is either one-of-a-kind or it is not; you cannot be “very one-of-a-kind”. So “very unique” should be wrong.

But lately I keep seeing “very unique” in reputable publications, blog posts and even published fiction. Example:

  • This is a very unique opportunity.
  • Her perspective is very unique within the field.

I understand the argument: when writers say “very unique”, they usually don’t mean strictly “the only one in existence”. They mean “unusual, distinctive, standing out from most others”. It’s a soft, weakened meaning of unique.

So now I’m confused about the practical standard. Prescriptively, it’s incorrect. Descriptively, it is widely used and understood by native readers.

My main question: when writing formally — essays, reports, professional emails — should I avoid “very unique” to keep strict editors happy? Or has this usage become standard enough that it no longer counts as a mistake?

Do native speakers notice and cringe when they read “very unique”? Or is the old rule just a leftover grammar myth these days? I’d love to hear your take, especially if you work as an editor or writing tutor.


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Do you pluralize “Walkman”

2 Upvotes

r/grammar • • 1d ago

Is my text correct?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

Hello world! Tell me please, is my text correct or not? Bounty hunter Dr. Knig Schultz and Django, the slave he freed, become partners. They have a very important mission ahead of them: to rescue Django's beloved, Broomhilda, from the home of the cruel slave trader Calvin Candie.


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Hi when should i use past tense and when i should i use present

1 Upvotes

Call me on video chat after your father sleeps

Or

Call me on video chat after your father slept


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Hi which one is correct

0 Upvotes

Hi which one is correct

Can you call me video chatting after you "took" a picture

Or

Can you call me video chatting after you "take" a picture

Take or took


r/grammar • • 2d ago

Aesthetic

3 Upvotes

that I’ve heard a lot of millennials and Gen Z kids use the word “aesthetic“ in a strange way. I often see posts of a woman recording herself referring to a room or a piece of furniture as, “so aesthetic”. This feels off to me. Can someone explain why this word has become tweaked and modified in this way?


r/grammar • • 1d ago

Which is correct?

0 Upvotes

Thus born was the idea of freedom OR
Thus was born the idea of freedom


r/grammar • • 2d ago

quick grammar check could you please help to check this sentence grammatically?

0 Upvotes

hello, I've been studying English for 1 year and i still don't know why creat sentences that sound unnatural or creat them from scratch

could you see whether this sentence incorrect or correct grammatically and in case of clarifying give an explanation pleas, i ask this from a lot of chat bots but they gave me different answers

" you spend as little money as you don't even notice you spend"

the concept was about equality between the other two concepts


r/grammar • • 2d ago

Brain damage or brain damaged

0 Upvotes

We were talking about how my memory isn't as good as it used to be since I got a TBI (traumatic brain injury). In response to something, I said "my brain damage ass probably doesn't remember". They are arguing it should be "brain damaged ass". Which one is correct?


r/grammar • • 2d ago

Is there a difference between explanatory and self-explanatory?

3 Upvotes

r/grammar • • 2d ago

What does "me" mean in this situation?

2 Upvotes

"Out onto the Technicolor streets with me daffodils…." - comes from the musical "Hair", as Claude says this to his parents, that are telling him to join the army, and handing them the daffodils.

Should it be "my" or "me, daffodils"? Or maybe some written accent cause it's a czech - played version? Thanks


r/grammar • • 2d ago

People Adding the Word “That” Where it Serves No Purpose

0 Upvotes

I started noticing a trend about five years ago but I don’t know how else to describe it. People add the word “that” to a sentence almost like it’s going to be a modifier but then do nothing with it. Examples; You’re looking for that confidence; She felt that happiness. Has anyone else noticed this and how would you describe it?


r/grammar • • 2d ago

quick grammar check Adverbs used next to one another, wrong or not?

0 Upvotes

Hello, trying to prove someone wrong here!

When expressing how badly you did is "absolutely horribly" correct?

From what I know it should be "absolutely horrible" or "horribly" alone..

Is this a common misconception from thinking what sounds right is what should be right?

Please feel free to educate me on whether or not there are exceptions as well, thanks.


r/grammar • • 3d ago

I can't think of a word... "Sorry my English is not perfect, I hoped I haven't confused you" is that correct? I tried write chat with someone.

2 Upvotes

r/grammar • • 3d ago

[DISCUSSION] Anyone else notice Fiverr’s UI mixed up “who” vs. “whom”?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes