r/classicwow • u/ryecoke55 • 6h ago
Forever Let it be a lesson
Will this community start waiting til confirmation and stop dooming over datamines? Probably not.
•
u/Henslock 3h ago
People in this sub are genuinely overdramatic as fuck.
•
u/Poseidor 3h ago
You'll enjoy the game significantly more if you don't pay attention to this subreddit. People will ruin it for you with their negativity.
→ More replies (2)
50
u/Gay_If_Read 5h ago
No bro you don't understand they're just walking back store mounts after complaints this was a test to see if the player would push back or not!
/s because it's definitely necessary on this sub
•
u/TonySperguson 4h ago
this but unironically.
i saw those skyborne druid models. i saw skyworld.
•
u/SunflowerPetBattler 4h ago
They just did the same thing in retail like a month ago with the housing exterior barns.
Clearly labelled as shop items in the datamined files. Backlash ensued. Blizzard walked it back.
•
u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 1h ago
Sure except people have datamined endless things out of WoW clients over the years that have never made it into the game.
-5
17
u/silentknight111 5h ago
With WoW especially you have to take any data mined assets with a grain of salt, because the clients share assets to make the download smaller if you have all the clients installed. I would imagine it's relatively easy for new assets to temporarily get labeled as shared and so downloaded to a client it doesn't belong to.
12
u/KalameetThyMaker 5h ago
Blizzard has also stated repeatedly that theyre intentionally obfuscating information and hiding items and other things behind actually being seen in game for the first time, and that datamined content is more untrustworthy than ever.
But everyone's gotten lost in the sauce and just has an insatiable need to know everything so they either dont miss out or to capitalize on every small thing.
•
u/andynator1000 3h ago
They said the same shit for SoD and nothing really changed. The only things that will be hidden that were not hidden for SoD is the items from raid and some spells like boss abilities, but once things are encountered by anyone in game they can be seen by the dataminers.
Also, this isn't an example of them obfuscating or hiding information, these were assets meant for a different game that were incorrectly packaged with forever. There was also a bunch of retail stuff that didn't belong in the build. The dataminer who set this all off is also the one who was (partly) responsible for the "experience change" fiasco recently.
8
u/Hreny2 5h ago
I was exactly thinking this today, when the mounts were datamined. Like what a prank it would be to add bunch of random shit art assets to the latest build, just to see how the community will react to it.
•
u/FuckOnion 4h ago
And if the community doesn't start a shitstorm over them, actually ship them? Genius.
•
u/ty4scam 1h ago
Or add a bunch of good art assets and not release them for over a year when they will be rewards for some top tier raid down the line. Now you have epic le trolled and also made the company millions in more people expecting high quality content, and also built insane hype when that raid finally releases.
•
u/syst3m1c 3h ago
This is the worst community. The dialogue around Forever is the worst it's ever been, too.
This is a video game. It's supposed to be something that's fun. If you read this sub you'd think all these balancing changes are impacting people's incomes and livelihoods.
Like... Holy shit there's a chicken in my video game. Or oh my God this one fictional race has 1% more of a chance to critically strike. Let's all loose our goddamn fucking minds.
•
u/Magikazamz 1h ago
What funnier is that the chiken and turtle are just HD version of the TCG classic mount. Like people complaining about the turtle disney eyes as if it was not in game since 2006 is funny.
•
•
•
→ More replies (5)•
u/MooseRunnerWrangler 2h ago edited 46m ago
People don't even know there was a Rooster, Spectral Tiger, and Turtle in OG WoW-WOTLK. So it's not like they weren't classic.. these were just HD versions.
Edit, I was wrong on the order.
• Riding Turtle (Saltwater Snapjaw card): Released on October 25, 2006, in the very first TCG set, Heroes of Azeroth. • Spectral Tiger & Swift Spectral Tiger (Spectral Tiger card): Released on August 22, 2007, in the Fires of Outland TCG expansion. • Magic Rooster Egg (El Pollo Grande card): Released on June 30, 2009, in the Fields of Honor TCG expansion.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Godisgumman 52m ago
It was even in tbc (2007)…
•
u/MooseRunnerWrangler 50m ago edited 5m ago
Well end of Vanilla before TBC launched you could get the Rooster, then Spectral Tiger TBC, and then Turtle WOTLK. They were just extremely rare, and a lot of people here never actually played launch, so a bunch of people don't even know they are literally classic mounts lol.
Edit: I was wrong on release time • Riding Turtle (Saltwater Snapjaw card): Released on October 25, 2006, in the very first TCG set, Heroes of Azeroth. • Spectral Tiger & Swift Spectral Tiger (Spectral Tiger card): Released on August 22, 2007, in the Fires of Outland TCG expansion. • Magic Rooster Egg (El Pollo Grande card): Released on June 30, 2009, in the Fields of Honor TCG expansion.
29
u/Sazbadashie 5h ago edited 5h ago
no, the internet and gamers as a whole have been sucked into the whole datamining culture so much that they take files and the state of leaks as gospel.
i'm sure blizzard can hide a file that contains a fanfiction between Sylvanis and a murloc and people would go "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN!!1!" and then freak out about how it breaks the character and the lore and how Blizzard is ripping off princess and the frog and how they don't respect their players anymore.
12
u/Puzzleheaded-Net4365 5h ago
They should start doing that, fill the game with hidden shitposts to give miserable folks something to whine about while keeping it fun for everyone else.
0
u/Sazbadashie 5h ago
imo every game dev should do that... if I had enough time and bandwidth to learn I would. if people are going to data mine it anyway.
1
u/NTufnel11 5h ago
Easter eggs are fun, but if you're going to do that most developers will put them for actual players to enjoy, not just data miners.
2
u/Sazbadashie 5h ago
yes, but data miners can't help themselves they WILL share with the rest of the community.
→ More replies (1)3
u/FreeSpeechIsDeadge 5h ago
People also seem to believe that everything can be datamined. When blizzard wants to hide something, they can. The race to world first guilds have analysts whose entire job it is to datamine the patches for raid information and they didn’t know a secret phase was going to happen on L’ura last tier.
1
u/Thrilalia 5h ago
I wish Blizz did do that. Well not Sylvanas x Murloc romance fan fic. But a ton of red herrings that make leakers not knowing what is real and what isn't.
0
u/Rahavic_Jr 5h ago
I couldn’t give a shit about anything you just mentioned “US” gamers have been sucked into.
→ More replies (3)
19
u/Kelras 5h ago
If they're not Forever assets, why is their texture resolution downscaled as textures for models in Forever are?
2
u/DM_ME_KUL_TIRAN_FEET 5h ago
TBF, if someone clicked the wrong checkbox in the project and they were marked as forever it’s reasonable to think that basic texture rescaling would be a step in their integration automation.
Could it be a walk back? Sure. It just didn’t seem like the uproar was all that big to justify a panic reaction 🤷♂️
•
•
79
u/PackerHATE 5h ago
Yall are whiny bitches. You’re ruining everyone else’s excitement for a game we’ve been waiting ages for. Just go away, for real. I can’t be the only one sick of yall.
•
u/FuckOnion 4h ago
How does one's excitement get ruined by someone else complaining (about a beta)? You like the game. Why does someone else's opinion change that?
•
u/Eateries 3h ago
Or they can just log off Reddit? People complaining are passionate about a game they love and want to be good. What do people expect?
•
u/Gjork 4h ago
I don't get it? If people don't like the chicken and they think it's in the game...can't they complain about it?
In what world is that not acceptable? Blizzard is shaping this game and by their own words they are taking player feedback very seriously. They read these forms.
•
→ More replies (6)•
•
•
→ More replies (5)•
u/unsubscribeaccount99 3h ago
If reading reddit is ruining their excitement, maybe they shouldn't be reading reddit.
5
8
u/shafty17 5h ago
Crazy I got flamed earlier today for daring to mention we've already confirmed they use placeholder assets and deliberate obfuscation of data mined assets so not to put too much stock into this new wave
3
u/Sea_Advantage_2577 5h ago
You cant reason with classic andys. Thier main goal in life is to be outraged
→ More replies (3)
6
2
•
u/Arturia_Cross 4h ago edited 4h ago
You realize its far more likely that they're just backtracking after seeing the reactions, right? These mounts were specifically found in Forever files. The mounts even had that whole half ass attempt at being low resolution but still modern look about them.
•
→ More replies (2)•
u/SystemofCells 4h ago
If that were true they would have just kept their mouths shut and never released them. You guys are nuts.
•
•
u/subOptimusPrime16 3h ago
What’s more likely; That these mounts were never intended for Wow Forever like Blizzard claims, or that in 24 hours community feedback convinced Blizzard to reverse course and NOT make truckloads of money.
•
u/hamstervideo 2h ago
What’s more likely; That these mounts were never intended for Wow Forever like Blizzard claims, or that in 24 hours community feedback convinced Blizzard to reverse course and NOT make truckloads of money.
The first one is more likely
→ More replies (1)•
u/Plus-Visit-764 49m ago
Idk… it was only datamined in forever and not retail or classic.
Could be a coincidence, but still odd.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Acework23 2h ago
if you believe the second , you are part of the problem and should consider touching grass
→ More replies (1)•
u/schmink13 3h ago
Bingo. Now let the bots, corporate boot lickers, and people with their heads buried in sand tell you otherwise.
→ More replies (2)
11
u/fantabulouz 5h ago
these retail andys folded under 0 pressure LMAO. they wanted the paid retail asset mounts, pets, and funko pops so badly they gaslit people that these were proper additions to classic+
•
u/lmay0000 4h ago
What the fuck do you mean “folded?”
Ya, the dudes saying they liked the mounts folded when blizz said “these aint for forever” lol
→ More replies (5)
5
u/Ok-Armadillo5821 5h ago edited 4h ago
Yeah, they also said there wouldn't be wow tokens of lvl boots in classic.
•
5
u/zippexx 5h ago
Better to complain for no reason then to not complain and getting shafted later on. Sorry not sorry.
•
9
•
u/Alabaster_Potion 4h ago
But like... you should complain after it's verified to be true.
•
u/Shrabster33 3h ago edited 3h ago
Look at sky elves. We never even got a chance to complain before they were already shipped and sold.
We have to assume the worst every time because that's what blizz has taught their customers. They have a history of always going back on their word and fucking things up.
Blizzard hasn't earned our trust back. Look at this.
https://old.reddit.com/r/classicwow/comments/1x7nxh5/madseasonshow_explaining_why_some_of_us_during/
•
u/Ashamed_Grape_5228 2h ago
What makes you think blizzard would design a race and then make sure it's ok with reddit before putting it in the game?
•
•
•
•
u/Freetshirtsplz 4h ago
"if I don't make up this argument and then get mad about it, it will come true"
•
u/echo_tempest_plz 2h ago
Totally correct. It’s sickening to see how mentally unwell this community is.
It’s pathetic to live day to day being on high alert for unfinished changes in test realms for a video game. But these people like to call themselves “data miners.”
•
u/zippexx 31m ago
Whatever bro. WoW was my favourite game for like 15 years, I loved that game so much. In midnight I couldn’t even make it to max level because the game is unrecognisable.
You act like a company that added a 100$ auction house dino into their game deserves the benefit of doubt that any datamines or beta difficulties are totally non concerning and that’s simply crap.
2
2
u/Replicant_Six 5h ago
A couple of HD mounts would make you think you got "shafted"?
•
u/SnooHamsters4389 4h ago
HD mounts =/= mounts that look derpy enough to be in a disney film
•
2
•
u/zmotmootmid 4h ago
better to complain for epic upvotes and get angry over nothing, true! reddit gold for you
•
4
u/wookie181 5h ago
But being the doom provider gets you updoots. Why would they stop?
1
u/Leyshins 5h ago
It’s like the 10th thread already within minutes, post and forget what everyone posted already. Even if it’s late by 5h after announcement it’s this “I created this thread mind”
Nothing happens to them either which is sad
2
•
0
u/Gukle 5h ago
People failed at life hard so they really need a win in this video game.
-2
5
u/Icy-Ad1811 5h ago
idk, seemed pretty obvious those were intended for retail
•
3
u/Whitechix 5h ago
Based on what? We already have 2 mounts that look just as bad coming with the forever bundle.
3
u/Icy-Ad1811 5h ago
the bear and skyborne mount? They seem a little more grounded than giant rooster and glowing tiger. Haven’t even seen if they will have an SD/HD toggle or not.
2
u/Whitechix 5h ago
The entire game didn’t have a SD toggle until some streamers convinced these guys lmao, I wouldn’t be surprised if these weren’t intended for the game before the realisation.
6
u/5panks 5h ago
... that look just as bad coming with the forever bundle.
This is why people don't take you seriously. They're not even in the same universe.
•
•
u/Whitechix 4h ago
Yeah the thing I used to turn into from shadowlands but more over the top is just as bad buddy, what’s your point other than to act smug? I can already see what eyesores they are going to be in orgrimmar or wherever.
•
u/5panks 4h ago
It's not smugness it's a reality check for you that you'll get farther and maybe actually sway people if you stop using dishonest arguments.
Calling the pre-order mounts at all similar to the chicken and fairie dragon mounts that were datamined is dishonest. They're not even close to the same in terms of the classic visual identity.
•
u/Whitechix 4h ago
It’s not dishonest to call the blue mount that looks straight out of ardenweald from shadowlands just as bad. It’s doesn’t fit the vibe at all.
•
u/OldmateRedditor 3h ago
Ignore the haters in this thread. If you see something you don’t like, even data mined, speak out. Blizzard are paying attention and it’s clear by the last minute addition of SD models that they need us to continue sharing our wishes for the game.
If you don’t like ‘people whining’ get off reddit and touch some grass. This is a place for discourse and critique if you don’t like that go somewhere else.
→ More replies (1)•
u/knight109 14m ago
Absolutely, and I will continue the discourse the game should be more HD so we can bicker and argue for eternity.
•
u/redactid55 4h ago
So many losers take this message that they were wrong to be outraged and are trying to spin it into a delusional win that they backed down blizzard
Some actual mental illness on display
•
u/ZAROSPO 1h ago
•
u/Humble-Chipmunk-7197 47m ago
Guess you were in the room when the decision was made eh.
Dooming is dooming.
→ More replies (1)•
u/kopecm13 36m ago
They may just straight up lie after the community feedback.
•
u/sabe1234 1m ago
Would be better if all of you guys just move on and play another game than wow as you obviously have a problem with the publisher. Your life would be so much more filled with happiness than all those crocodile tears
1
•
•
•
•
u/Amelia_redditname 3h ago
While people are whining, if the end result is blizzard is aware how unpopular store items in wow forever are then I'm fine with it.
•
u/Eateries 3h ago
Says more about the people on defense.
I didn’t see many talking about the possibility of it being datamined. I just saw a bunch of people saying to stop complaining while blindly defending assets that clearly don’t belong in Forever.
•
u/LostB3ar 3h ago
Im just reading „news“ like this, I read like 1-2 comments, I roll my eyes, and go about my day
Yall are way too unemplpyed and got too much time it seems
•
u/MidnightFireHuntress 3h ago
I am willing to bet at least 85% Of the people who post on this sub don't even play WoW or haven't played in 10+ Years.
•
u/MooseRunnerWrangler 2h ago
WOW crazy, like I said in the post crying about it, the games share the same client as retail and these are likely for that.
Even if they weren't, The Rooster, Turtle, and Spectral Tiger were released in OG Wow, TBC, and then WOTLK anyway with the card game.... So, technically the mounts were classicish anyway, just HD. Glad they aren't coming, except the rooster, the rooster is legit.
•
u/commonCranberry999 2h ago
theres already a ton of out of place shit you can see on vendors in the beta, there's a whole $30 race with a whole zone full of it.
maybe these specific assets aren't coming to forever, but it's very obvious the direction that they're going and i'm sure a year from now there will be a ton of out of place retail looking shit in the game.
•
u/EggiesaAreYum 2h ago
You just know someone at Blizzard deeply wants to add some fricked up stuff for dataminers to "uncover" and watch as this sub grabs torches and pitchforks.
I know I would. Something silly like Thrall defecting to Alliance and waging a war as a questline, Warlock talents that make them an actual tank, MLP Mounts (or something similar but not copyrighted).
•
•
u/Acework23 2h ago
people love to freak out and hate, this will continue as long as there is datamining, fuck those people btw
•
•
•
•
•
u/veritaslol 18m ago
It’s almost like they said from the beginning not to trust data mining but the doomsayers needed some doom to preach :)
•
1
u/Olivr_A 5h ago
If a model is in the game client I'm assuming its intended for that game...
0
u/Ashleynn 5h ago
It's called bait, and it worked.
5
•
u/Olivr_A 4h ago
Why would blizzard try and bait you. How does that make them money
→ More replies (3)
1
u/Its-a-me-DankeyKang 5h ago
Its easier to doom and whine than it is to think rationally unfortunately
1
-2
u/Actual-Phrase7933 5h ago
Makes it even more disgusting that people defended the idea of them being added they'd defend LFR and wow token too.
→ More replies (7)
-5
u/theStingraY 6h ago
Imagine the low IQ take that would defend Blizzard. Oh wait, it's right here.
3
u/According-Estate7428 5h ago
Why are you even on this subreddit? If you hate the game so much do something else with your time, it’s pathetic to behave how you do.
1
u/theStingraY 5h ago
I called the guy an idiot with a bad take (like yourself), doesn't mean I hate the game.
0
u/Longjumping-State887 5h ago
THANK GOD. I was actually so disappointed when I saw that fucking chicken...
0
u/NegativeAd1432 5h ago
I mean, they did say in the last week or two that the game client file size is a lot bigger than intended and they will shrink it down in time. The logical conclusion would be that there are extra art assets in the files left over from porting the client/stuff from other versions.
0
u/GAMING_SERVER_ADMIN 5h ago
This Subreddit dooming this place like RS3 subreddit with the whole new servers ugh.
•
u/Dangerous-Leader-779 4h ago
It’s possible they were meant for retail.
Or even meant for China WoW Forever or something. They get different mounts and even rules (GDKP), not that uncommon.
•
u/_CatLover_ 4h ago
Lesson for what? what if we loudly tell the devs we dont want HD retail disney mounts they will come up with an excuse to not add them? Like claiming they were never intended for forever, just happened to be added to the files by mistake?
•
u/BarbsFPV 3h ago
If I was Blizzard I’d put all kinds of unintended assets to be mined, so then nobody knows if the assets are real or not.
Just like they flooded the zone with leaks before Forever was announced. One of the leaks was actually legit, and said “Forever” was going to be the new game, but there was already so much noise in the channel that it got drowned out by all the fake leaks.
It worked pretty good the first time so why wouldn’t they keep doing it?
→ More replies (1)•
u/plants4life262 3h ago
Say you’ve never worked near a development pipeline without saying you’ve never worked near a development pipeline.
It is remarkably possible an asset was included in the wrong version of wow. I cannot stress that enough.
-3
u/Koroklica 5h ago
I would rather complain asap rather than wait and see and then having a bunch of stuff that we don't want in the game.
Also we have seen that they hear feedback, since they adjusted the sky elf druid forms. I would rather have them properly make 1 asset instead of having to rework already fully made and implemented one.
2
u/Blessed_by_Sigmar 5h ago
Get well soon
1
u/Koroklica 5h ago
I don't mean it in a negative way. Isn't what beta and this whole thing is about right now? The game isn't out, they want to know what we like and don't. If we just say okay to everything and then stop playing if we don't like it nobody will be happy, not Blizzard and not us (I really like wow forever so far from what I've seen)
2
-4
u/pbeenjoyer555 5h ago
This is literally the most obvious instant reaction to backlash ever, they thought people would be sucking their @ so much because of hype that they could get away with this.
It doesn't accidentally get added onto the wow forever section, it was datamined because it was meant to be released.
•
u/infernalhawk 3h ago
You know nothing about corporate processes lmao. There is 0 chance they would be able to get an approval to scrap something like this is a few hours.
-2
-5
-7
u/whoxcaresxixdont 6h ago
That stuff was to test the waters to prove to the bean counters not to fk with the game or ppl will riot.
-10
u/Front-Investigator68 6h ago
A lesson? Did you see any of the initial datamined assets? There’s a reason people were freaked out — history taught us not to trust Blizzard lol
1
u/Heckin_ReaditTards 5h ago
If you don't trust Blizzard, why are you even playing? You obviously can't trust them to do whatever you want so you'll just always be a miserable person who cries online all day.
•
u/Banthian 4h ago
Those were 100% for Forever and if it wasn't for the backlash they'd never have pulled it back





178
u/MXC_Vic_Romano 6h ago
No lesson to learn, dooming is a hobby for those types.