r/classicwow • • 15h ago

Forever BLIZZARD PLEASE

Post image

When I was a kid, I somehow managed to get the Sprite Darter Hatchling without even knowing it existed. I had one of the coolest pets in the game and didn't even realize how rare it was. That accidental discovery made it all the more special, and it's a memory that'll stay with me forever.

Now look how they massacred my boy.

I know one is a rare drop in Feralas and the other might be a shop pet, but the difference in design philosophy is undeniable.

And the fact that you can just buy it now makes it feel even less special. Back then, getting that pet was a genuine achievement or sometimes just an incredible stroke of luck. You had a story behind it. Now it's just another shop purchase...

4.2k Upvotes

590 comments sorted by

169

u/SugarCrisp7 15h ago

The new one looks like a faerie dragon and a murloc had a baby

58

u/fkit4ever 14h ago

A retail murloc

16

u/Rolniacznik 13h ago

*baby murloc

9

u/DashD0GG 13h ago

I don’t think baby Murlocs should be making babies…

→ More replies (1)

60

u/marcofifth 15h ago

Seeing the sprite for the first time while in Ashenvale was a really cool experience for me.

26

u/zombiefishin 14h ago

We found the rare one in WC, everyone kinda stopped and admired it

8

u/marcofifth 14h ago

Like seeing fireflies as a kid at night.

Seeing a world crumbling as I left Teldrassil, it was the first thing that felt truly magical on the journey.

A world that had been losing its magical beauty still had hints and glimmers of it left if one left the beaten path.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

811

u/PsychicSweat 15h ago

New data mined stuff too cartoony for retail, let alone classic.

194

u/beirch 14h ago

Didn't they specifically say they added duds for dataminers that won't be added to the game? I'm betting/hoping this is one of those cases.

93

u/amolaeanni 13h ago

Yea , they specifially made highly detailed adapted to all races sets and mounts to troll dataminers

33

u/Fancy-Passion-2193 13h ago

they are way more advanced than that, they made a whole fake rexarr set that doesn't even work and then released it for $30 before removing it from the game all just to pwn the dataminers

6

u/fiction8 9h ago

Both of these models exist in other versions of the game. The left is from Legion and the right is from Dragonflight.

Neither was made from scratch for Forever

13

u/jazzjazzmine 10h ago

People have been saying that with every wave of datamined garbage for over a decade and so far nothing has turned out to be rendered just for the dataminers..

→ More replies (3)

9

u/dumxblonde 13h ago

have you seen the latest owl store mount in retail? lol that and the squirrels definitely do not fit in

5

u/Korix88 14h ago

I remember reading they were adding items into the database that were red herrings just for this reason, some of these are probably put in to mess with us.

44

u/yojimbofog 14h ago

This is copium on a whole other level. Do people actually think a company as cheap as Blizzard is spending resources making fake models to throw off data miners?

5

u/Background_Bad2984 13h ago

they are not duds but they can be unused/unfinished models

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/ChadSurfer 13h ago

The amount of copium you guys snort to truly believe Forever won’t eventually have flying robots like retail is unreal.

→ More replies (10)

35

u/Prettybroki 14h ago

put in to mess with us

i love it becouse you are a company with such little credability that you think you can joke with the players while they want you dead

8

u/marcofifth 14h ago

How does a company know what is too far if it never tests the edges?

The problem isn't that a company pushes against a boundary and gets backlash. The problem is when the backlash establishes a boundary and the company continues pushing past it anyway.

If Blizzard never tested what players wanted, would WoW have evolved at all? Or would we still essentially be playing Classic WoW with some new zones attached?

Experimentation necessarily means occasionally discovering that players don't like something. That's information. What matters is what the company does with that information afterward.

The sprite on the right of this image is clearly too Disneyfied for someone who wants the world taken seriously. The sprite on the left is where the magic of Classic WoW actually existed.

If Blizzard puts both kinds of experiments in front of players and learns where that boundary is, that's not a failure of credibility. That's one of the ways they figure out what the identity of the game actually is.

3

u/i_continue_to_unmike 12h ago

If Blizzard never tested what players wanted, would WoW have evolved at all? Or would we still essentially be playing Classic WoW with some new zones attached?

isn't that exactly what we all are hyped for rn

2

u/Prettybroki 14h ago

thats what im most concerned about, they still are so indecisive, they still did figure out classes, style, horizontal progress. we going blind as they are.

8

u/marcofifth 14h ago

The beta should have been longer.

Nobody is asking for them to rush this.

3

u/Prettybroki 14h ago

they did a whole blitzcon for it, they had nothing to announce but forever, and since everyone else loved that SoD was close to realse they did the same thing

→ More replies (9)

6

u/TerribleSalamander 15h ago edited 6h ago

What if it’s not in the US client, or not even going to be implemented at all?

Edit: Womp womp

https://www.reddit.com/r/classicwow/s/FaVU2PblJ7

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (7)

49

u/findorb 14h ago

They need to hire one dude who just says "yes" or "no"

334

u/Putt-blugger 15h ago

The right one looks like a plushie.

I think they need to hire a separate art team for Forever. It's painfully obvious that these retail artists aren't up to the task. They're good at the furry-esque artstyle they usually do but they seem to be one trick ponies.

91

u/xiiicrowns 14h ago

Hire a director who can keep creative on track.

29

u/SkumtFlum 13h ago

Can't be that hard, point at wc2/wc3/wow art style. Tell them to continue like that.

13

u/xiiicrowns 12h ago

One would think it was that easy. But idk.

4

u/SkumtFlum 12h ago

I am aware that it's not that easy aswell, but it would be a good guideline. Compare what you made to that, does it fit but higher definition?

4

u/ag_robertson_author 9h ago

You'd think that would be easy but look how bad they blundered it with Reforged.

They should get whoever is doing the WC3 Definitive edition graphics to be art lead on this.

29

u/TheArsenal7 13h ago

They’re all furry/scalie freaks

→ More replies (2)

15

u/Proxnite 14h ago

I think that relearning (or honestly learning since most of the art team likely didn’t work at Blizz 20 years ago) how to draw in an art style takes time. They’re taking feedback and working on de-retail-ifying things like sky elves, I’m optimistic that they’ll eventually get a better understanding of the art style and be able to produce it from the get go instead of needing to redo their work.

12

u/Jademalo 14h ago

It absolutely does, see the absolute state of Kourend on release in OSRS compared to what Shayzien and Hosidius look like after their reworks.

It's wild though that they've learned absolutely nothing from OSRS's path doing exactly this same thing.

2

u/LaCiDarem 13h ago

You can know and see how something can/should be done, but that doesn't automatically give you the skillset or experience at doing that. That just takes iteration.

3

u/Jademalo 13h ago

Exactly, though the lesson imo is to start incredibly cautiously until you're comfortable, rather than barrelling in both feet first and then having to rework everything

3

u/LaCiDarem 11h ago

Well, I guess I'm saying that they very well could have learned from OSRS, but just knowing it doesn't mean they'll be able to get it off the bat.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/APoliteFrog 12h ago

It does take time. But it's also what they're paid to do. I briefly took a pre-animation class in college and they started teaching us how to replicate an art style within the first couple months. It was also explained to us how commonplace that would be. Additionally, I've worked on a large-scale modding project (not for WoW), and even as enthusiasts working for free, it was expected that we be able to keep to a certain set of rules for the design pipeline. Rules which were clearly defined and communicated to us. Asking them to keep to the classic artstyle isn't nitpicky or entitled-- it's standard practice.

23

u/tethysian 14h ago

They could literally just refer to the existing textures and models and go from there. There honestly is no reason it should be this difficult if they actually wanted to stick to the original art style.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Chancho1010 7h ago

How to Train your Dragon-esque for sure

→ More replies (1)

99

u/jussa-bug 14h ago

See this is what I think people are actually concerned about in the HD vs SD discussion, not the number of pixels. One has more classic fantasy design, the other looks like a Pixar character.

26

u/Fyvrynifl 13h ago

Yeah HD/SD is a misrepresentation. It's the retail art style versus classic (really vanilla + TBC imo where it started to significantly diverge in wotlk) art styles.

7

u/jussa-bug 13h ago edited 10h ago

It seems like the end of WotLK is where they started really trying to give everything this impression of weight and thickness. Like swords started getting really thick and almost bludgeon-like. Building structures started getting more faction flair (which was good), but became almost too over-stylized and dramatic. Forsaken structures in particular look like something out of a Tim Burton art installation, but really they should probably just look like darker-themed human architecture.

It just seems like they’ve been leaning hard into a bright and cartoon-like art design, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing environmentally (Suramar and Other zones in particular are exquisite), but losing a lot of classic fantasy elements in model design has kind of sucked.

Edit: Clarified Undead vs Forsaken

2

u/stinkybobo123 10h ago

Undead structures in particular look like something out of a Tim Burton art installation, but really they should probably just look like darker-themed human architecture.

aren't the undead structures basically copy pasted buildings from warcraft

5

u/jussa-bug 10h ago

Sorry, I meant Forsaken. Scourge architecture is from WC3, but Forsaken architecture is newer.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/stinkybobo123 12h ago

the one on the left is a model from Legion, the one on the right is the BABY version of faerie dragons made in dragonflight. baby models have always been made with the "huge eyes and head, tiny body" idea in mind. in any media.

4

u/Rixxer 8h ago

The one on the left is in Classic. It's a companion pet you can get from a quest in Feralas.

https://www.wowhead.com/classic/item=11474/sprite-darter-egg

2

u/stinkybobo123 8h ago

no, its not from classic. its from legion because its an HD model and looks less goofy than the original classic model :)

5

u/Independent-Ad4612 11h ago

they could make a baby version that looks nothing like Disney if they wanted. This is just a sad excuse lol

4

u/tear_atheri 12h ago

it's not even that. look at the smooth, cartoony texture features. you can make a baby that fits in with classic wow

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

63

u/Anxious-Schedule-598 14h ago

Why do all new models look like plastic Fisher Price toys??? Bugs me so much

→ More replies (15)

30

u/kaffeofikaelika 11h ago

The original one looks like an actual mystical creature. The new one looks like a cartoon character.

8

u/TigOlBitties422 11h ago

What I’m getting from classic plus is that they’re gonna make this into a Disney game

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

132

u/fkit4ever 15h ago

WhY dO ClAsSiC aNdYs KeEp CoMpLAiNiNg aBoUt HD GrApHiCs

37

u/Mavman11 14h ago

Surely the retail players commenting that are just rage baiting right.

10

u/BigBigMacMacBigBig 14h ago edited 14h ago

the funny thing is that retail andies (I am from retail too by the way, not classic player) will say how stupid boomer you are for wanting SD models in LOW POLY SD GRAPHICS WORLD, where literally 99,9% of everything is from 2004 (would be 100% but they decided to add hd models), they will say how stupid you are because you want consistency in style and graphics, the devs will listen to them, then in half a year they will abandon SD models saying "nobody wants them",

then classic andies, of course, will quit wow forever because it would be too hard for them going to auction house by feet instead of summonning a VOID CREATURE mount with "VOID AUCTION SPHERE" FROM DRAGON SPACE WITH ANGEL WINGS AND GALAXIES surrounding it’s feet, leaving US, 27 year old boomers with sum "consistency" preferences, leaving us with their shitty disney shrek models.

I finished. English is my 2nd language so the text could be scuffed

6

u/panlakes 12h ago

Yep. Tourists are gonna ruin the game.

2

u/Jakcris10 7h ago

Honestly haven’t met anyone who is opposed to Higher Definition models.

What they’re opposed to is the retail artstyle.

Anyone who doesn’t understand this at this point is just trolling.

→ More replies (4)

41

u/Shalelor 14h ago

And people whine when bringing up the disneyfication comments.

→ More replies (20)

19

u/_SeventyEight 14h ago

Jesus christ wtf is that

6

u/Sure-Air5311 12h ago

This shit is to throw you guys off btw. Yall fallin for bait

61

u/ShoshinTFT 15h ago

Its gonna be a short "forever" if these datamined items end up being shop purchases and what not.

I've mostly stayed out of whether they should be looking to attract Classic or Retail players to this game, but making it a slightly different retail with the bulk of retail's monetization would be a mistake IMO. Retail players do have and clearly enjoy continuing to play Retail and the new content as it comes out. Why split that playerbase across two games when a LOT of classic players who currently don't play are looking for a new experience and absolutely will not stick around if you do any of the things that are strictly associated with the Retail experience?

I'm not saying people should or shouldn't be okay with this. If people like it thats fine, I just know some of the stuff that has happened in the past day has me starting to side with all the people saying they won't be trying Forever and canceling their subs/refunding the game.

12

u/Round_Bound_Mound 12h ago

Reddit said the same thing about TBC boosts and I saw that fucking dragon mount that comes bundled with it EVERYWHERE.

3

u/Front-Investigator68 7h ago

Zero chance a TBC mount was ever as important to the game as the artstyle and monetization of the next biggest thing in WoW history lmao

→ More replies (4)

6

u/tear_atheri 12h ago

i mean you do realize their new skyborne race is a $30 purchase once launch happens right?

This is their plan. wow "forever monetized" with new classes / races / etc as microtransactions

5

u/These_Appointment594 14h ago

Two games means twice as many shop items.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Calm-Inevitable3341 14h ago

don’t worry, 90% of the players will gobble this stuff up without a second thought. blizz knows their audience

20

u/ShoshinTFT 14h ago

I really don't think thats the case. Classic players and Retail players are 100% different audiences and Retail players already have a space they enjoy and are sunk in to. Some will stick around, but I'd bet on Retail players making up the bulk of players who check out after a while because why make a bunch of purchases in Forever when you're already invested in Retail

Edit: In other words, trying to monetize Classic players like you would Retail players is a mistake and I don't think this game ever becomes a huge success off the back of a primarily Retail audience.

9

u/no_shoes_are_canny 13h ago

Classic players and Retail players are 100% different audiences

Yeah, not the case. There's lots of players that bounce between the two (soon three) depending on the patch cadence. Blizz staggers their retail, classic, remix, etc releases for this very reason.

Blizz needs to focus on the average sub and consumer, not the people who only play one version of the game and don't buy anything outside the sub. Monetization is the only reason Forever exists.

2

u/FuckOnion 11h ago

They most definitely don't need to focus on the imaginary average player, especially since they have so many different offerings. Let players choose a flavor they want instead of making several cookie cutter versions.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

9

u/Perceptions_ 13h ago

Retail minus

55

u/Eastern_Purchase3589 14h ago

HD defenders will look at this and say there's no difference.

Is it too much to ask that our models not be made by anime deviantart sonichu people

17

u/doctorpotatohead 13h ago

These are both HD models, one is a baby. Are we stupid?

3

u/ImpossibleRatio7430 7h ago

The one on the left is a “hatchling” brother. The one on the right was designed like a stuffed animal.

7

u/-Kai- 12h ago

Are we stupid?

Yeah pretty much. You're the first person I've seen even mentioning the fact that they're both HD. Everyone else is just frothing at the mouth over meaningless ragebait as usual.

Psychologists should seriously consider studying these communities. I wonder if the average user even has the capacity of introspection and theory of mind. Everything posted here is just mindless rage driven by base impulses, it's embarrassing knowing that the majority of users here are like 40+, yet never seem to have matured past the age of 15

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/stinkybobo123 14h ago

the one on the right is a baby faerie dragon as opposed to the only adult faerie dragons in classic wow, so yes, there will be a visible difference?

there are HD adult faerie dragons in retail as well and they look exactly the same as the ones from classic but with more discernible textures

8

u/Eastern_Purchase3589 14h ago

Except there was no need to give it the giant manga/anime watery eyes just because it's a juvenile dragon. Looks dumb

→ More replies (4)

2

u/PurpleNo9988 13h ago

the one on the right is a my little pony

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

30

u/MoistCucumber 14h ago

Holy shit is the one on the right real? Are Blizzard artists even trying? Do they even know? Hello kitty island adventure type shit

3

u/i_continue_to_unmike 11h ago

yo hello kitty island adventure is fun tho

6

u/You_Shoddy 13h ago

Not to my buddy the sprite, man...

https://giphy.com/gifs/l4FGGafcOHmrlQxG0

4

u/MeineDumpling 7h ago

The original is my favorite fantasy creature of all time. I loved it so much in vanilla that I said if I were to get a tattoo, that's what it would be.

I got it done a couple years ago. It's my first and only tattoo and I love it!

12

u/Noguru0 14h ago

Wtf is that

18

u/Pain_de_Chocolatine 14h ago

Retail forever 

11

u/Darksnails 14h ago

Who keeps giving these pets and mounts huge anime eyes? Smh

19

u/fierox88 8h ago

Wow this example shows everything wrong with Blizzard art design these days in one single pic.

2

u/missingpiece 7h ago

It’s amazing how many pics can do that in one single pic

5

u/Calm-Inevitable3341 15h ago

finally a reason to order a happy meal again

7

u/Affectionate-Koala90 12h ago

Please, blizzard stop with these cutesy designs if you want to roll with the vibe of vanilla WoW. Take a look at the art of warcraft 3 and the first couple of expansions and use them as an inspiriation and not retails inflated plushie looking models.

→ More replies (4)

27

u/FarUnderstanding5107 15h ago

If something looks "cute" it doesn't belong.

21

u/lingzhui 14h ago

I think the problem isn't cuteness itself, more that retail follows a more Anime style as opposed to original Comic book/Rock album mixed with 90s fantasy novel art

9

u/PerceptionInception 14h ago

100% agree. I've always thought of the original style as "heavy metal comic book." It's colorful but with a fantasy-based grittyness to it.

→ More replies (5)

13

u/Ebantero 14h ago

The original was cute in a different way.

9

u/lowrespudgeon 13h ago

Yes! This is really freaking cute! And it isn't a fat plastic inflated baby toy like that new thing.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/No-Crew-6528 14h ago

Murlocs would like a word /s

→ More replies (3)

4

u/shafty17 14h ago

get rid of gnomes i guess

→ More replies (20)

3

u/Sorry-Sale4373 14h ago

The quest line to hatch the sprite darter egg is one of my all time favorites

7

u/Arlune890 15h ago

Its an alliance only quest chain, not a rare drop lol

7

u/Troooper0987 14h ago

It’s a very rare drop on horde. Questline for alliance.

2

u/Arlune890 14h ago

Had no idea the horde could get it! Cool af. 

e* From what im reading it wasnt a drop until cata. Cant find a source on it being available in classic.

2

u/Troooper0987 13h ago

Wife got it in wrath, she and I had no clue how

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Wordshurtimapussy 14h ago

It did turn into a rare drop in I think in wotlk, might have been tbc though. It was originally an alliance only quest chain reward.

2

u/ThoughAww 10h ago

Was looking for someone to correct everyone in this thread who were saying its a drop. We got a bunch of wrath babies here

→ More replies (13)

5

u/Crunnnch 12h ago

I like the left one better but I think the people who are more likely to spend money on these are more likely to like the one on the left.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Loose_Clock4873 5h ago

Wait, is this a serious post?

8

u/edelea 6h ago

this whole post is kind of misleading and dumb but everyone is eating it up anyway.... i do agree retail has become way too cutesy in recent times, not just models but all the onesies, butterfly and fox ears tmogs, the way the story is told.. it all ads up. but a BABY version of something isnt a good comparison for this argument... and the left one is STILL an HD model from retail people... lol these are literally both retail hd models.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/No-Contract-9123 14h ago

Disneyfication all over again

2

u/NoDuck7588 15h ago

Is that second pic the result of a Murloc banging a Faerie Dragon

4

u/smomovic 13h ago

Is this real? This can't be real... Is it???

3

u/userrnam 13h ago

They've said no game token, no boosts, no server transfers. It's pretty obvious the cosmetics shop angle is gonna be pushed hard.

5

u/delfino_plaza1 10h ago

Fr this all has been exposing how blizzard’s art direction has completely and utterly changed to Disney Pixar. Bring back classic wow, gritty, high contrast and something that takes itself seriously.

7

u/Raptor_Jetpack 14h ago

man they really can't help themselves can they? just no restraint at all...

5

u/WonderfulTruck5894 13h ago

If they put this in forever, just not gonna buy it, they ruining everything my god

2

u/lowrespudgeon 13h ago

I love cute things, genuinely. But these new abominations (like the turtle mount too) aren't even cute. It's like an alien was forced to watch baby shows 24/7, clockwork orange style, and told to design pets and mounts after.

2

u/theurge14 13h ago

The one on the right looks like it drools.

2

u/He_will_divide_us 13h ago

New one looks like a fkn baby murloc with wings

2

u/Shoddy_Sun6990 13h ago

Yes, Blizzard needs to stray away from the Disney-overly-cutsey art style that clashes with classic wow timeless art-style. Keep to those foundational pillars discussed at Blizzcon at all times, or the game will slowly just become what it's trying to separate itself from.

2

u/Inner_Ad_453 13h ago

Interjecting you could just buy the pet then as well. Off the AH. No difference here really.

2

u/J0eykarate 13h ago

Left image: something that looks cool and fits in an MMO setting. Right image: a 4-year-old's plush toy called Bestie, which they got at Disney.

2

u/TheArsenal7 13h ago

What is the obsession with the Disney aesthetic? WoW was always somewhat cartoonish but not childish like this

2

u/HoodieNinja17 13h ago

Who the fuck are they making this game for

2

u/Jazdu 13h ago

They pull Brightwing on HotS and then decide to create whatever is that thing in the right?

Lmao

2

u/IntrepidAstroPanda 13h ago

Looks made for a how to train your dragon mobile game

2

u/ThePianistOfDoom 13h ago

They did my boy Puck so wrong

2

u/Mangodanger3232 12h ago

Look what backyard breeders have done to the beautiful faerie dragons

2

u/LaunaStarfall 12h ago

I too randomly got this as a drop when I first started playing wow. I was so excited I loved that little critter so much haha! It turned into a huge obsession with collecting pets, I was so thrilled when pet battles launched in MoP.

2

u/Status_Echo_6766 12h ago

you will eat the disney slop

2

u/XianL 12h ago

Yep, only the left image fits with the classic aesthetic. The mounts that were revealed are also WELL outside the vibe.

Blizz needs to hear our feedback loud and clear.

2

u/SmashenYT 12h ago

AND THEY STILL DEFEND hurr durr blizz didnt "turn disney" like bro ? BRO ??? its that spongebob episode he shows patrick all the garbage even in the walls =D

2

u/LiveToThink 11h ago

they really just need to take the retail-adjacent model artists and reset their design language. Most importantly, undo their cutsey overwatch/disney/focus-grouped everything-has-to-be-pretty tenancies. They have the capability, but they just aren't committing.

2

u/solarflare4646 9h ago

Gaming was entirely different back then. What some people want today simply cant exist because the community wont allow it. There is no mystery to these things anymore because it was solved in data mining.

2

u/Squirrel09 6h ago

I saw this post a couple hours ago and thought "dang, hate that they changed its model."

Re-looking at it now, I see OP is just talking about design philosophy between two different assets.

It's a good discussion... But now what I think a lot of those up voting this thought it was about.

•

u/Summerfancies 3h ago

I also had it drop for me! And I loved it! I hope they stick to the original. He was such a cutie.

7

u/Krum_Rum_2hell 14h ago

We need to be the Runescape community. FUCK this shit.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/FitAd6887 15h ago

World of Creditcard Forever

8

u/toasty5566 14h ago

The left fits, the right is Disneyslop nonsense

3

u/Zolityx 13h ago

wtf is this

7

u/hucklepinch 14h ago

I refuse to believe the one on the right exists. There is no fucking way they would think that belongs in Forever...

5

u/Beautiful_Tennis3704 14h ago

STOP GIVING US ASSETS THAT LOOK LIKE THYRE OUT OF AN ANIME

3

u/Rush_Banana 13h ago

Warning: There will be bad actors who say they prefer the one right in the coming days.

Do not engage, just downvote them and move on.

3

u/Constantinch 13h ago

"Bad actors"

Jesus you people are so pathetic, you created some sort of conspiracy around how models look. This is so stupid. The only opposition you have will be people saying that it's not a big deal (including me)

Also it's not an either or, one is a pet another one is a mob

1

u/ArcticKev 12h ago

One on the left is both a mob and a pet. One of the best pets. Baby Spyro the dragon on the right is not welcome.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/No_Procedure3881 14h ago

One is an adult fae. The other is a baby one.

I mean, if you wanna criticize things, at least be intellectually honest and do it in some good faith.

Were you crying over the murloc babies or cute pets from the Children's week event ?

6

u/ImpossibleRatio7430 7h ago

Bro the classic model is “sprite darter hatchling”

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Debibule 13h ago

They're two separate art styles. Babies dont look like plush toys IRL they look like adorable, snotty messes. A baby of the one on the left wouldnt look like the one on the right.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/melancholyrefresher 13h ago

I'm sure a lot of people have grown to hate anything "cute" in the game because "Disney".

Tiny murloc? Disney.

Little chicken that follows you around? Disney.

Anything that isn't bloodsoaked edgelord slop? Disney.

Orc peons from WC2? Believe it or not, Disney.

3

u/ThatPerspective1277 12h ago

Why does he look like this 🥺?

3

u/dontcallmefudge 9h ago

He was sleeping and someone just hit him with a club clearly

5

u/McGames355 12h ago

Are you actually trying to argue that the baby version ISNT Disney vs the adult??? Lmao come on now, that shit doesn't belong with the classic styling in any way. To say differently is just being difficult for no reason.

→ More replies (23)

3

u/No_Procedure3881 13h ago

They are the same complaining about the new datamined turtle while the original was already there back then and was already looking cute and "disney" af.

Baby murloc was a pet from TBC collector. Same for the baby netherwing drake.

I can’t believe these raging people are mostly grown ass dudes who can’t even remember that some of these things were already implemented in their "dark, violent and full of testosterone game".

But they are probably the same who were bullying blood elves players for being f-word or this kind of sh*t.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/SignsOfNature 12h ago

Who gives a fuck what it is. It looks like retail and it has to go.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Spleenseer 14h ago

And the fact that you can just buy it now makes it feel even less special

I don't get this argument.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending the cash shop or the art style of anything from it, and I have zero plans to ever purchase any items on offer, but they're clearly different things.  The original Sprite Darter pet is still in the game, and it's still obtained the same way.  A different looking thing being obtained in a different way doesn't take away what you already had or the effort you put in to obtain it.  If you go on an adventure with your OG Sprite Darter, no one is going to look at you and go "I bet they bought it", because that's not how it's obtained.  I would dare say that makes it more special, because it sets you apart from people too lazy to obtain the real thing on their own.

5

u/Deliverz 13h ago

One of the core parts of Classic is what I would call a “gear flex”. Basically sitting around in a main city with your cool shit, and people either knew you put in some work to get said cool shit, or wanted to know how to get it. Yes, there’s very much an ego part of it, but that’s part of the mystique. You can’t tell me you’ve never said holy shit and ran a little further up the bank steps just to inspect the guy rocking a Thunderfury and t3, or the bloodfang rogue with badass swords etc….

That completely goes away when you can just buy the stuff. Then you get a clown world type of environment like retail where there’s too much random shit and half of it is just something someone paid $20 for.

That doesn’t even take into consideration the art style clash. Clearly, the original team had a much different style than the modern team

3

u/vervaincc 12h ago

That doesn’t even take into consideration the art style clash. Clearly, the original team had a much different style than the modern team

The photo on the left was not created by the original team. It's from Legion.

2

u/Spleenseer 12h ago

But if the bought things are visually distinguishable from the stuff that was earned, how does that make the earned stuff less impressive?  If I saw two players standing side by side, each with a different version the Sprite Darter pet, I know which one I would respect more.

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/Correactor 14h ago

Do people think that classic WoW had zero cute things in it? The world was brimming with cuteness.

5

u/Grenrion 10h ago

You miss the point. It's being thematic. Those giant cute anime eyes don't fit in the classic design even by classics cute designs these are just retail slop.

3

u/stinkybobo123 10h ago

is TBC considered classic wow? if so then google the egbert and willy pet from children's week and explain how they don't fit in the classic design

→ More replies (6)

4

u/OdinzSun 13h ago

Watched a video of Xaryu watching a new player compare retail and classic. It’s absolutely hilarious when she describes classic as whimsy and Xaryu’s like “What?! classic is whimsy?! I don’t see that at all”

Like bro the Warcraft universe has always had cute or whimsy things going back to Warcraft 1.

4

u/Sudden_Energy 12h ago

 "Jawbs done" "roight-o" 

4

u/-1703- 11h ago

nah dude, this is peak manliness about **war**. dont you see how they look exactly like metzens 30 year old gruesome and definitely not ripped out of Warhammer sketches?

you can tell this is manly and not whimsy because you can count the polygons on the mohawk goblin with tnt strapped to his chest, the goblin hiding in a literal explosive barrel, and the goblin with a cartoon sized rocket strapped on his back thats wearing a literal pickelhaube

fuck techies btw.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Silverbacks 14h ago

The one on the left IS cute. But it also feels more grounded and realistic. Like something that is biologically natural in a fantasy world.

2

u/Kimkar_the_Gnome 14h ago

“Biologically natural in a fantasy world”

3

u/Dr_Henry-Killinger 13h ago

What he’s saying is that the creature looks more natural and like it follows some rules of biology to make it more believable as an actual animal. The thing on the right looks like candy for predators, like it just has a sign on it that says “eat me”. It’s like the difference between the biology on Scavenger’s Reign and the biology of Spongebob. One obviously took a lot more thought into how these creatures would live and work and the other one said “lol cute talking sponge”. This isn’t a dig on Spongebob, I love it, it’s just an example of the different priorities that go into creature/character design.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/Sufficient_Grand_549 14h ago

The "feels" in the previous sentence is implied to be the verb in that one as well. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (21)

3

u/HildrynMain 14h ago

There are different styles of cuteness. The post illustrates it quite well, I think, since it's (supposedly) the same type of creature. They don't belong in the same game, if there's any degree of cohesive artistic direction.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

2

u/vervaincc 12h ago

People in these comments don't even know what they're complaining about.
The left image isn't from vanilla/classic. That's the updated "retail" model that was updated in Legion. If you look at the vanilla model - it does indeed look more like a murloc with wings than a lizard. If anything, the classic model is more cartoony than the current Legion model.
The one on the right looks fine as a baby variant of the classic model, other than it's HD.

2

u/Key_Lock_304 12h ago

delusional.

→ More replies (8)

1

u/Rusty-Dildo-Inside 14h ago

They should just use Diablo 4 art and models for wow forever

2

u/melancholyrefresher 13h ago

Now that's the edgelordslop that will put the Warcraft back in Craft

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/mtnlol 13h ago

But this pet is a quest reward?

1

u/Jesustron 12h ago

Speed heals

1

u/SnooPuppers398 12h ago

They added an easy to get slime pet as well. I feel like it devalue the disgusting ooze. 

1

u/Annual-Gas-3485 11h ago

Oh. They went full Disney on that thing. 

1

u/SmokeySFW 11h ago

Every now and then it's fun to see some of the things that inspired Dota 2 characters. This is Puck!

1

u/Pollia 11h ago

Right looks like a plushy version of brightwing in HotS.

1

u/larce 11h ago

Disney trash

1

u/furious-pig 11h ago

It all looks like it’s been made by AI

1

u/Famous_Fudge3603 11h ago

It's possible to convey cute without going this far into cartoon exaggeration. But the old models will always have a bit of gruff, coarse "realism" to them that we won't see anymore.

1

u/Willthwab 11h ago

Finally, we reached World Soul Saga Forever before the game even hit live

1

u/MiaLovelytomo 10h ago

theres no way right?

1

u/grazaramafingfong 10h ago

I spent a whole week farming for this thing and never got it.