Not everyone should be good with high damage, not everyone should be good with hard enemy shutdown, not everyone should be good with skills, social conversation, travel, survival, magic, knowledge, etc., but everyone should have something that they are special at that is actually useful.

In a word with a spell that gives you near infinite food and water, with your character concept revolves around survival, you should either have theses spells or have a mundane ability just as good as those spells if not better.

Its a team game. Its important for roles to overlap so no single role hinges in a single player character, but everyone should have their One Unique Thing, something that put them apart in the CURRENT TEAM COMPOSITION IN BOTH GAMEPLAY AND STORY.

A Barbarian for example is thematically an outsider, a warrior of rage, a berserker, someone with immense strength, heightened senses and exotic knowledge about common stuff. I envision them in combat throwing themselves in the middle of the biggest group of enemies to mow them down, scare the rest and then focus the biggest and meanest around. Meanwhile outside combat they would perform feats of strength, use their animal-like senses and reflexes and maybe even use knowledge from another culture to apply another angle to a problem.

edit: Because I forgot to say all of mine:

Artificer: In combat = varible thanks to items, but with a focus more of support and controller; Outside combat = item crafting & utility.

Barbarian: In combat = Melee horde breaker, big foe slayer, big crits, damage mitigation; Outside combat = Feats of supernatural strength, animal-like senses and reflexes, outsider's perspective

Bard: In combat = Ally Support (Buffs, Heals) and Enemy Controll (Debuffs, Counters); Outside combat = What I call a "Socialite": not only a party Face, but also some who help someone do something better like checks, recovery or any other non-aggressive task

Cleric: In Combat = The premier support class, but with a secondary role that varies with Divine Domain; Outside combat = party recovery, a bit of a Socialite and spell utilitarian

Druid: In Combat = Premier Terrain/Battlefield Controll with a side of animal summoning; Outside combat = Anything to do with Nature, specially in a magical way

Fighter: In Combat = Swiss army knife of combat, with a primary focus on single target damage; Outside combat = a bit tricky, but could lean into either the "veteran soldier" or the "folk hero" with a more common knowledge of all things mundane brought to the extreme

Monk: In Combat = Dodge Tank (high evasion with a focus on attracting enemy focus by being annoying) with high mobility, many attacks and attack redirections; Outside combat = Disciplined hermitic adept, with many wise words to say, not just someone who punches a lot...

Paladin: In Combat = a mix of party defensive boosts, healing and offensive holy magic; Outside combat = Party face and light socialite, just something other then a fun police

Ranger: In combat = a mix of high precision single target damage, crowd controll, terrain controll and high mobility for a full guerrilla tactical kit; Outside combat = survival skill, traversal skill, utility powers and light socialite capabilities

Rogue: In combat = anything dirty trick: attacking an exposed part, throwing dirt in the eyes, low blows. Basically Debuffs and really high extra damage for attacking vulnerable foes; Outside combat = being the best at a given area of specialization, almost as good or even better than magic

Sorcerer: In combat = go all in into the Innate Sorcery and make it a Transformation class based on your power source, leaning on it and Metamagic harder; Outside combat = giving more uses for how your sorcerer origin changes how you deal with your day to day live, like a Draconic being more imposing and a Clockwork more predictable

Warlock: In Combat = The Premier Debuffer class (hot take, but every Warlock should had a special familiar); Outside combat = Ivocations would let you pick and choose how you interact with things outside combat, but you should still be the best or second best at rituals

Wizards: In Combat = High Learning Curve but High Reward, you are good with everything except magic (and another hot take, I still defend a healing wizard subclass) at the cost of more difficulty of usage; Outside combat = the best spell utilitarian in the game, with an answer for almost anything with enough knowledge and preparation.

I believe Brutal Strike is widely regarded as a great feature, which I agree with. It adds some tactical options beyond attacking for damage all over again, which has always been a general Barbarian problem.

I was theorycrafting Barbarian builds and desperately wanted to create something different to the standard GWM Berserker/Zealot damage dealer. World Tree added some much needed tactical flexibility, but it actually felt a little too glass canon - low-ish AC with Reckless Attack along with features that keep multiple enemies close attacking you is quite dangerous even with Resistance from Rage. So I looked at rather defensive options and Barbarian actually can get decent AC with a shield. Without reckless, that's actually decent survivability. Advantage can be achieved with something else like Topple weapons or Shield Master feat. With the level 6 feature of World Tree that also means disadvantage to one enemy's attacks and advantage on my own, as reducing speed to 0 prevents them from standing up. So far, so good.

Now comes Brutal Strike, which I can only utilize by using Reckless Attack. By doing so, I actively hurt my whole prior build options. I nullify my enemy's disadvantage from being prone as well as making my own advantage from it redundant.

That's only one example though. Basically any tactical option for getting advantage is redundant with Brutal Strike - grappling, flanking, lots of spells from allies (Farie Fire, Entangle, Web, you name them). There are a looot of options revolving around the Advantage/Disadvantage mechanics that would otherwise be great teamwork opportunities - but not for Barbarians apparently.

It would have been a much better design choice to key it of advantage (regardless of source) to encourage variant Barbarian builds and teamwork.

Is there anything I oversee? What's your take on the subject?

Starting at level 3, will go all the way to level 20 using slightly homebrewed published WotC adventures (Tyranny of Dragons and then a pivot to the Vecna book)

I have never played a Wizard, but I'm a bit burnt out on Charisma first face characters and martial characters at the moment, and thought I'd play the class I would most likely be if I were dropped in the forgotten realms, the nerd.

I will lean into the versatility of the Wizard, no question, but I do want a theme for some of my spell choices, like a signature of sorts. Ive always loved the fantasy of weather magic- cold, wind, thunder, rain, lightning, flight, etc.

Starting at Cantrips, what are yoir favorite weathery Wizard spells for damage or control/debuff?

Is there a consensus on the book yet? I've been out to sea so I wasn't able to review it until lately or watch any youtube videos on it.

The classes all seem fine, some seem better than others. I do think Mystic Hand Monk should get a second level 3 feature like the other 1/3 casters. And I do wish they had come up with something unique for the level 6 rather than just copy pasting the EK.

The Origin Feats seem good and balanced. Seems a Familiar based class build works well...not sure how I feel about that as it seems to step on toes of the Pact of Chain Warlocks a lot. Pact of the Chain and Investment of Chain Master still do a lot, but all the uniqueness of the Warlock familiars are overridden when you cast Battle Familiar. Its probably ok. Arcane Eloquence could be an issue on CHA based characters, stacks with guidance/Bardic Inspiration/Expertise, guess that Bard isnt ever failing.

I"m not sure why but I feel like Arcane Warrior should be limited to Fighters, Arcane spells on a Paladin or Ranger feels thematically wrong. But it probably doesn't matter. Decent for Champions who want some utility.

The full feats seem to be a problem, at least some of them. Evocation Adept lets any full caster be a Wizard, just getting all the juicy spells.

Edit. Its odd, before this I always thought for 2024 that feats were how you customized a martial and spells were how you customized a spell caster. Mostly because the PHB had so many more feat options and branches for martials. Casters seem very locked in with only a few choices and one or two that everyone took. Now it seems that casters get just as many options in the feat department.

Reading the Vestige patrons abilities, I have a question about the vestiges ally in combat. Specifically when your character uses their Bonus action, the vestige can use its Strike attack? Or are you only able to activate your vestiges Strike attack if you sacrifice your own Attack action?

"It can move and use its Reaction on its own, but the only action it takes is the Dodge action unless you take a Bonus Action to command it to take an action in its stat block or some other action. You can also sacrifice one of your attacks when you take the Attack action to command the vestige to take the Vestige’s Strike action."

Like it says; you can use your bonus action to use something from vestige stat block and the Strike action attack is in there. From what I've read from others posts it seems like you can use your vestige bud as a combat pet taking moderate single ranged magical attacks, for your characters Bonus action slot.

Hey everyone, I’m going to be playing a necromancer in my next campaign, and I really don’t want to slow combat down so much. I was wondering if you guys had any macro I can use for the 5.5 animate dead.
Edit: I was searching for something digital, like on roll20

Conceptually, there was a lot to look forward to in Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall. It's the first campaign released under the D&D 2024 rules, a rare example of a high-level adventure that takes characters all the way to 20th level, and an extended look at the land of Thay that pits the heroes against the undead tyrant Szass Tam.

The campaign is presented in the minimal detail that has become typical of D&D products in the 5.5e era, with smaller dungeons, shorter encounters, and scant setting information. The entire level 11-20 campaign is expected to be completed in about 15 to 20 sessions, a skeletal outline that offers plenty of room for expansion but no support for DMs who want to do so.

But this review is not about the campaign's mechanics or lack of DM support. Instead, I want to address some deeper problems with the basic premise that would pose challenges even if the adventure were fully developed.

Setting and lore

Traditionally, Thay has been an aggressive, expansionist power that threatens not just its neighbors but all of Faerûn. It has also been an oligarchy in which the population, much of which is enslaved, lives under constant oppression, first by the Red Wizards and now by the lich Szass Tam. The people may be as varied as any other nation but their rulers are thoroughly, unambiguously evil.

This fulfills an important niche in RPGs: you need some enemies for the player characters to beat up on guilt-free. The Thayans occupy that role in the Forgotten Realms, just as the Order of the Emerald Claw does in Eberron or Iuz and his followers do in Greyhawk.

Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall goes in a different direction, sanitizing the land of Thay. The gazetteer describes the Red Wizards as fascists and Thay as hostile to its neighbors, but it does not mention slaves or slavery. Presumably this was done to avoid offending player sensitivities (or perhaps to avoid giving creepy DMs a tool to harass their players, though there is only so much any adventure can do in this regard), but I find it has the opposite effect. The issue is not just that the adventure avoids acknowledging the very existence of certain kinds of evil (although this does not bode well for the Dark Sun release next year) but that it does so as a prerequisite for realigning the characters' goals. The campaign doesn't ask the player characters to vanquish a threat from Thay, but one to Thay.

Szass Tam, who has somehow been demoted from supreme ruler to just one zulkir among many, plans to conduct a magical ritual that will summon an army of undead--how this is any different from the undead army he already has is unclear--which he will use to conquer Thay. In other words, his master plan is to restore the status quo that existed right up until this adventure was published. Another zulkir enlists the player characters to protect Thay from his schemes. While neighboring nations will ultimately be endangered by Szass Tam's designs, they don't factor into this adventure at all. The problems are entirely internal to Thay, and the solution is presented as removing one problematic figure from power while leaving the basic system of governance in place.

Imagine if Raiders of the Lost Ark featured Indiana Jones running around Nazi Germany, raiding various historical sites and uncovering various artifacts so he could stop Adolf Hitler on behalf of a Nazi general and you will begin to see what's wrong with Deadfall.

There's one detail that provides a perfect (if probably unintended) demonstration of this problem. One of the illustrations is captioned "Thay's conflicts with its neighbors cause substantial suffering to all involved." The picture shows a cell of Red Wizards in magical battle, with one grief-stricken wizard cradling the body of a fallen comrade. Yes, Thay's conflicts cause suffering to all involved, but the picture asks us to feel sympathy only for the fascists who started the trouble.

Genre and tone

Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall bills itself as a "magical spy thriller" in which characters conduct secret missions with high stakes and the constant threat of discovery. In practice, though, the spy elements of the adventure mostly boil down to the characters giving each other code names and tossing around a smattering of contemporary terms like "intel."

This is purely a matter of personal taste, but I'm always disappointed when designers use contemporary frames like this without any regard for whether it fits the setting. This language wouldn't be out of place in a world like Eberron, which is much farther down the road to modernity and the bureaucratic state that spawns this kind of jargon, but in the Forgotten Realms--and the magocracy of Thay in particular, a place that has rejected modernity in favor of magic and necromancy--it feels out of place. Each group's mileage will vary, obviously, but the language used here tells me that the adventure does not understand its own setting.

A much bigger problem, one that is much less subject to personal taste, is that these spy trappings have almost no impact on the adventure. The first couple of missions make a few halfhearted attempts at fulfilling genre conventions (playing cards with an enemy in a gambling den, collecting blackmail material to turn a merchant into a pawn) but these will be over in a few sessions. Soon the PCs will be going on standard dungeon crawls, such as exploring an ancient temple to retrieve a magical Maguffin. (This Maguffin never changes hands once the party finds it and no one else is looking for it, which removes the whole point of putting a Maguffin in a spy story.)

The campaign continually swerves away from more interesting material to give us standard fare. At one point, the party is tasked with recruiting a band of pirates and persuading them to raid Thayan shipping. Could be a fun opportunity for some swashbuckling high seas adventure or a cool nautical heist, right? Wrong--the pirates ask the party to explore a dungeon (which is in their own cove and which they have not breached). The dungeon is all of four rooms long. The last room contains a map to a second dungeon, which is not included in this adventure. Hand it over to the pirates and they will raid the Red Wizards' ships, doing all the fun stuff for the party.

This happens over and over as the campaign continually reverts to dungeon crawls. Dungeons are all well and good--it's in the name of the game!--but these dungeons are not particularly suited to spy adventures as they lack the mechanical support you would expect for the genre (guard rotations, alert levels, and so on). The prevalence of so many minimal, bog-standard dungeons raises the question of why the designers bothered with the spy thriller trappings if they were never going to commit to the genre.

Morality and player agency

The campaign's refusal to commit to its setting or its genre also affects the way it manages the moral and political dilemmas that it raises.

Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall gives the party a patron, a Red Wizard named Xelnene Thrul who is both the tharchion of Priador, one of Thay's richest provinces, and one of the eight zulkirs who rule supreme over Thay. In other words, the party's patron is one of the most powerful people in Thay, an obvious rival to Szass Tam. That's not the problem.

The problem is that she's neutral good.

This shouldn't be possible in Thay--you don't get to be one of the eight most powerful people in a militaristic slave state by staying a good person--but of course, Deadfall has sanitized the Thayans so they're not as bad as all that. Still, it contradicts everything that has previously been established about Thay to suggest that any of the zulkirs could be good-aligned (and in fact all but one of the other zulkirs are evil, suggesting the designers know the Thayan government is a tyranny but, once again, they are unwilling to commit to the premise).

Interestingly enough, Thay: Land of the Red Wizards by Ed Greenwood, Alex Kammer, and Adam Patrick includes a very similar character. In that sourcebook, the tharchion of Priador is a wizard (though not a Red Wizard) who built a private network of spies, wants to improve the lives of ordinary Thayans through commercial prosperity, and is willing to work with outlander adventurers. But that tharchion is lawful evil, because Greenwood and his collaborators understand that Thay is still a corrupt oligarchy. Its reformers just want to wrap the iron fist in a velvet glove--and they want to make sure they control the fist.

This could have been a tremendous opportunity for Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall. What if Xelnene Thrul were lawful evil? What if her ultimate goal was not simply to prevent Szass Tam from completing his ritual but to overthrow him and claim Thay for herself? She would still be a massive improvement over Szass Tam in many ways--she's not looking to summon an undead army, and Thay's neighbors would be safer in the short term--but her attempt to enlist the player characters in her ascent would force the party to confront certain ethical choices. A good-aligned party would have to decide if they are comfortable replacing one dictator with another. An evil-aligned party might decide they want to replace Szass Tam themselves. These dilemmas would open up exactly the sort of realm-building play that high-level campaigns are supposed to explore.

But Deadfall doesn't trust players to make these decisions. Every possible point of moral friction--every place where the players might have to make a tough choice--has been sanded down. The early chapters are careful to provide nonlethal means of resolving the spy missions, which might be a thoughtful consideration for some groups but also takes the sting out of the genre. Sometimes the guardrails are so thick as to remove any stakes from the adventure: If you can convince one of Szass Tam's agents to stop spying for him with a DC 15 Persuasion check, why does Xelnene Thrul need the player characters at all? And what sort of spy adventure assumes all these agents are just going to keep their word once the PCs leave? Everything is absurdly easy, especially for high-level play.

The later chapters don't even have this rudimentary level of moral challenge; once you're crawling through a dungeon filled with evil undead, you have left the world of moral choices behind. Half the fun of the spy genre is the compromises it forces on the characters, the murky atmosphere in which noble goals are not enough and outcomes are never certain. Deadfall's unwillingness to embrace the genre's conventions once again raises the question of why the designers decided to bill this as a spy thriller in the first place.

Missed opportunities

Arcana Unleashed: Deadfall could have been a gritty spy story filled with ambiguity and betrayal and tough moral questions that offer no easy answers. It also could have been a rollicking heroic fantasy in which a band of unlikely heroes brave hordes of undead soldiers to overthrow the most obviously evil villain in the entire Forgotten Realms. Either approach could have worked, but Deadfall tries to straddle both genres and satisfies neither.

This speaks to a larger problem not just in Deadfall but in D&D 2024 as a whole. From class features that can be changed on a short or long rest to adventures that flinch from the implications of their own genres, the game does not want players to make a difficult choice. That would limit the potential for any campaign, but it's fatal to this one.

Hello, fellow adventurers! Today, I'm excited to share a preview of the Tome of Summoning v2.0! The compendium features over 60 pages on the theme of summoning and planar magic, offering new options for players who want to command powerful entities in battle. At its core is the Summoner, a unique class built around a lasting bond with a Summon - a companion that grows stronger alongside its master. Unlike temporary conjurations, a Summon is a permanent ally, highly customizable through a list of almost 145 Enhancements, allowing players to shape its abilities and role to fit their playstyle. The class also comes with a 8 subclasses, each proficient at summoning a specific type of creatures. Some forge pacts with celestial or fiendish entities, while others call forth spirits, elemental forces, or creatures born of pure magic. Each subclass grants a unique Summon, further expanding the possibilities for customization.

Beyond the Summoner, the manual includes over 35 spells, 15 feats, and 4 subclasses, all designed to enhance summoning magic for spellcasters. Whether you seek a loyal companion, a strategic battlefield presence, or the means to command otherworldly forces, the Tome of Summoning is the right tool for the job.

The compendium is compatible with both 5E and 5.5E. No AI was used to create this project.

This manual just received a v2.0 update, including updated layout, illustrations, rules, balance adjustments, a brand-new subclass, and much more. For the occasion, you can find it discounted either on DriveThruRPG or my Patreon, alongside a vast collection of previews for this and all my other titles! I'm currently working on updated version of all my older manuals, so there's a lot to uncover :)

The DMG has rules for underwater combat, but seemingly none for treading water at the surface. I'm running some nautical combat and I'm hesitant to make it too frustrating with the Disadvantage on weapon attacks but at the same time I can't imagine being able to swing a greatsword while doggy paddling.

Is it good & fun or bad & boring?

The Hiding mechanics have been talked about to death since 2024 came out, but imo they themselves are fine. The bigger problem is the ambiguity on whether or not being Invisible conceals your location.

On the one hand, the Invisible condition doesn't state that it conceals your location, so it seems the default assumption would be that it doesn't. (Especially because that's explicitly how it worked in 2014).

However, the Hide action doesn't do anything other than give you the Invisible condition, so it doesn't make sense for you to try and Hide when you're already Invisible. There would be no benefit.

The conclusion you might draw from that is that it's impossible to conceal your location in 2024, but that seems ridiculous when you consider Hide out of combat, it would have basically no use.

So how do you rule on it?

Going to play an Eldritch Knight this campaign and wanted to start her off with magic from the beginning was going to take Magic Initiate:Wizard and a couple of wizard cantrips. One of the blade cantrips and then Ray of Frost. My question is will those cantrips work with War Magic at 7th level? I'm read it as any Magic Initiate:Cleric or Druid cantrips I would have picked would not work based on wording of War Magic, but if I'm picking Magic Initiate: Wizard they should work, but I just want to make sure.

Magic Initiate:Two Cantrips. You learn two cantrips of your choice from the Cleric, Druid, or Wizard spell list. Intelligence, Wisdom, or Charisma is your spellcasting ability for this feat’s spells (choose when you select this feat).

Level 7: War Magic When you take the Attack action on your turn, you can replace one of the attacks with a casting of one of your Wizard cantrips that has a casting time of an action.

I play a lvl 11 World Tree Barbarian.

I have completed my core build already (Tough, Polearm Master, Heavy Weapon Master).

I have Belt of Giants Strength, a Mantle of Spell Resistance and a Bloodaxe as attunement slots.

My dex is already at 14 with adamantine medium armor. So I don't need strength or dex anymore. I think my next best attribute is constitution.

What feats would you recommend at lvl 12?

Lucky seems fine but a bit weak after 2024. Slasher fits the build but it does not give con. Mage slayer would be nice but the same problem here.

I think the best next feat would be "Spell Resistant" because spells (save or suck) are the only thing that are directly dangerous to me. And another resistance would help me with tanking. Maybe I can swap out the Mantle of Spell Resistance because of it later.

I don't have any bonus actions or reactions to spare. I use all of them every round.

Hey everyone!

I've just released The Red Tithe, a folk-horror one-shot I've been working on, and I thought I'd share it here, especially with Halloween coming up.

The adventure takes place around Hollowmere, an isolated village with a rather grim tradition. For generations, whenever nightmares and strange disturbances begin to plague the village, one of its inhabitants is sacrificed to keep an ancient horror imprisoned beneath the local church.

But this time, something has gone wrong. A blood-covered survivor has fled the village, claiming that everyone is dead, and the characters are sent to investigate.

The adventure focuses on investigation, exploration, some unsettling discoveries, moral choices, and, of course, combat.

One of the main things I wanted to do with this adventure was make it playable at three very different level ranges: 3-4, 10-11, and 17-20. The story remains the same, but encounters, DCs, and enemies are adjusted for each tier, including three different manifestations of the final boss, the Blood Moon Beast.

It's a 75-page adventure, compatible with both 2014 and 2024 (5E and 5.5E), designed for 3-6 characters and roughly 4-6 hours of play. I've also included 6 custom monster stat blocks, 3 battle maps (8 versions in total), and 4 tokens.

It's available on DriveThruRPG if anyone's interested:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/589448

No generative AI was used in the creation of this adventure.

I've also posted several preview pages, including some maps and monster stat blocks, over at r/JonnyDM if you'd like to take a look before deciding.

Hope some of you find it useful for a Halloween session or your ongoing campaigns!

I saw this post in r/dndnext and wanted to share it. The OP is u/gccebrian and I have no affiliation with him or the Kickstarter Campaign

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/kingdomsofink/kingdoms-of-ink

I'm just super stoked about it, and I saw they didn't post it here, so I wanted to give it a bump for higher visibility. I hope you'll check it out!

Used Self-Promotion flair because nothing else really seemed appropriate. u/gccebrian, if you'd rather make a post and have me pull this, let me know and I will.





EDIT: Added pictures

So I wanted to make this post quite generic because I think 5.5 really has its lows and highs, and I want to discuss together what we would like to see in the future.

In my opinion, 5.5 at the start was really good, with all the different rules, spells, features that changed to fit the game better, and with my 2 years' experience, I found it way better than 5e in many aspects.

I think they should have touched on other features and maybe taken more rules from old 3.5e and 4e rules to give the game a more "complete" rule set.

My main issue right now lies with the recent supplement books.

While the DM tools and lore materials are solid, the player options feel uneven. Some options (like the Heroes of Faerun and Ravenloft subclasses) feel underwhelming, while others (like Circle Casting in Heroes of Faerun or feats in Arcana Unleashed) feel overturned. This imbalance likely stems from rushed production timelines and insufficient Unearthed Arcana (UA) testing, which mostly focused on subclasses anyway.

On a positive note, WOW book from what I've seen, it is my favorite so far and seems really balanced while also offering some new specializations which I'm really interested in.

Conversely, the next upcoming book, the Star Wars collaboration, isn't for me; I would have much preferred crossovers that naturally fit the Faerun setting.

Overall, i think Hasbro should give their designer more time to work if they want a better product, aim at better collabs, print more unique subclasses and features in their book (instead of only old features which could be changed with errata since the it's only little changes) and aim for a more complete edition in 6e (which should also try to solve every major problem remained from 5e).

Am I wrong, what do you think?

Anything from 5.5e is fair game, including third-party content. My character is a Khoravar (Half-Elf) Fighter with the Battle Master subclass. We'll be starting at level 3. I was thinking of taking the Farmer background as he did grow up on a farm and the Tough feat is useful for staying alive, but I was wondering if there's a better Origin feat for a character who was the personal bodyguard for the kingdom's princess?

The campaign will start with the princess being abducted to another realm and the party is brought together to try and find and retrieve her if that helps? DM said it won't be a long campaign, with it starting at level 3 and ending at level 8.

EDIT: Backgrounds can be custom, so we can choose any Origin feat for our Background.

Hi all, I'm the developer. I checked with the mods first and they approved this post.

Rollwise is a free iPhone app that teaches D&D rules in bite-size lessons, Duolingo style. You roll the dice, move tokens on a grid, aim spells and sort rules, instead of just reading. It's mainly for new players, but there are later chapters on combat, magic and running games as a DM.

System compatibility: 5.5E (2024 rules).

AI disclosure: I used AI to help with some of the coding and to double-check that every lesson matches the official 2024 rules, and some of the background art is AI-made. The lessons, questions and design are my own work.

It's free with no ads. Feedback on any rule I got wrong is very welcome, since that's the most useful thing this sub could give me.

App Store: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6771548395

Let me preface this by saying this is just white room stuff. These mechanics should never see the light of day, let alone a D&D table. I'm just posting this for folks who find this kind of stuff fun to think about.

This post is about unlimited Wishes. Specifically, Wishes that are not just unlimited in number, but also in scope. Meaning we want to cast an unlimited number of Wishes but not be restricted to duplicating 8th level or lower spells lest we risk losing our ability to cast wish ever again. Let's call these uWishes (as opposed to a restricted or rWishes).

To get unlimited uWishes, we need access to Simulacrum. The Simulacrum spell allows you to create a copy of yourself that's considered a separate creature. So if it casts uWish, it may forever lose its ability to cast wish again, but that's irrelevant because it wouldn't be able to get that spell slot back anyway. The important thing is that the original caster doesn't risk losing Wish. That's the common wisdom anyway.

In 5e, the only way to get unlimited uWishes was using what I call a slow simulacrum chain. Here's a primer on simulacrum chains. If you know this stuff already, you can skip past the bullet points.

• Fast Simulacrum Chain - Wizard casts Simulacrum on self (let's assume using a spell scroll). This creates a duplicate of the wizard, which we'll call S1. S1 has all of Wizard's spell slots. Wizard commands S1 to cast Wish to duplicate the effects of Simulacrum to create a copy of Wizard. We'll call this one S2. S1 has now spent its 9th level slot, but S2 has all spell slots (because it's a copy of Wizard, who had all spell slots). S2 then casts Wish to create a new copy of Wizard. This is S3, who again has all spell slots. S1 and S2 are missing 9th level. This continues to infinity but every new copy has used its 9th level spell slot (except the last copy) and can never get that slot back because copies can't regain expended spell slots.

• Slow Simulacrum Chain - Same start as before. This time, however, S1 casts Simulacrum directly (not through Wish). S1 retains 9th level slot and is missing 7th level slot. S2 does the same. S3 does the same. This time, the copies each are missing their 7th level spell slots but have their 9th level spell slots that they can use to cast Wish. But unlike the Fast method, where each new copy took 6 seconds to create, the slow method takes 12 hours to create a new copy (and the component costs, which we can ignore because every 15th copy can cast Wish to create a 25k gp ruby to fuel the next batch of copies).

In 5.5, they nerfed Simulacrum. Now, a copy that was created using Simulacrum cannot itself cast Simulacrum. It can cast Wish to duplicate the effects of Simulacrum, so the Fast Simulacrum Chain is still viable in 5.5e. But wizards can no longer have infinite uWishes. Because in order to have infinite uWishes, essentially need to be to cast two wishes, you could cast Simulacrum on yourself, and S1 could cast Wish to duplicate you while having a Wish left over. Then S2 could use one of its Wishes to duplicate you and keep the second. And so on.

There's only one subclass in the game that can do that, and it's not a Wizard. The Arcana Cleric gets access to Simulacrum and Wish at 17th level. Then, it gets access to greater divine intervention at 20th level, which grants the power to cast Wish. So we can do the Fast Simulacrum Chain but with each new copy retaining a 9th level spell slot. Infinite wishes baby!

Technically, this came online the moment 5.5e was released. At that time, 20th level clerics got access to greater divine intervention and you could play a legacy arcane cleric, who got access to 6-9 wizard spells at 17th level. But I only realized this was a thing while flipping through Arcana Unleashed the other day, hence this post. I haven't seen anyone talk about this, but it may be common knowledge by now.

Now a natural response to this mechanic might be "You really think Mystra is going to tolerate a million copies of you spam calling her for divine intervention every six seconds?" My response to that would be "If she didn't want me to have this power, why'd she give it to me?!" That's a bad answer of course, because the gods are fickle. Surely she'd smite me down anyway. But if I don't worship a god, then there's no one to stop me! So I'll just worship "philosophy" as per the rules in Xanathar's. Now I'm no different than all the other wizards out there using the weave to create a million copies of themselves.

TL;DR - because level 20 arcana clerics get access to two Wishes at the same time, they can cast Simulacrum on themselves, and each new duplicated copy of the cleric can use one Wish to duplicate the effects of Simulacrum while retaining the second Wish. An arcana cleric is thus the only subclass (I think?) that has access to infinite wishes without the 33% risk that they'll lose the ability to cast wish ever again.

EDIT: since so many people here either lack reading comprehension or see the word "balance" and instantly assume it's about solving whatever they believe is wrong with martials... you're not going to find any of that here. This is about lowering the barriers between all classes and some of their best features has altered overall balance and made multiclassing both easy and attractive to the detriment of addressing weak martial class progression.

The new Adept Feats, the Arcane Warrior fighting style, and a seemingly useless Common item known as the Spell Component Ring have revived 5.5e multiclassing options and inadvertantly resulted in a very imperfect and uneven balance patch.

The first: they flattened the power gap between Wizard and every other full spellcaster by expanding access to all spell lists via the new Adept feats and subclass features. This builds on the Magic Initiate feats included at launch. It reflects an intential strategy to shift away from character builds restricted tightly by class towards modular, highly customizable builds.

The second: access to magic and spell list progression is the great divide between martials and spellcasters. Arcana Unleashed introduced a subtle yet totally unintintive way to circumvent this power gap by allowing martials to sacrifice subclass progression in exchange for (relatively) seamless access to spellcasting.

I'm not sure if it was on purpose or by accident. Either way, the solution is crude, complex, and deeply imperfect for many reasons:

1. All half/third casters benefit the most. Most martial subclasses without any spellcasting features or access to the Arcane Warrior fighting style are either locked out entirely or have far less to gain. (Note: ranged martials options have changed too, but they still have a long build path)
2. It substitutes offering martials their own unique progression system that operates in parallel to spellcasting with simply duct taping a boosted spell progression to martials.
3. Progressing further into spellcasting requires forfeiting most of your subclass features.
4. It removes some of the consequences for full casters who want to take a martial dip since the Adept Feats grant Lvl 3 spells as long as they have the slots to cast them. (however, this means foregoing the War Caster feat at Lvl 4, forcing full casters to make a tough choice considering how important it is to pass concentration checks).
5. Many players will feel that this makes certain classes less distinct and muddles their core identity.

So, how does AU make it easier for some martials to gain access to spellcasting?

Certain melee martials who intend to multiclass into a full caster can cobble together the necessary Magic Origin Feats, subclass features, and the Arcane Warrior Fighting style can easily be SAD while transitioning from True Strike to using Shillelagh after gaining access to Extra Attack. This was already a viable path pre-AU, but it now removes the Origin Feat tax that imposed ability score penalties. The combination of the Spell Component Ring and the War Caster feat now allow many non-Rangers using "sword and board" to take the same route (most ranged martials will still want to multiclass into Warlock or Artificer before getting Extra Attack but they can go into spellcasting investment, although much later). If at any point you decide to trade your remaining subclass progession for spellcasting, you can quickly gain access to some potent 3rd level spells with a Magic Adept feat. You just need to have the slots required to cast them.

I'm conflicted. Multiclassing is much more interesting now. It comes with more meaningful choices. There's a lot of interesting combinations available to experiment with at the table, and it's not so good that it makes monoclassing suboptimal (which was often the case in 5e). But it comes at the cost of blurring the lines that meaningfully distinguish certain classes from others.