Clip from Injustice 2 .

Credit: Artist Keith Christensen

I decided on the name “lime lantern” to differentiate him from the green lanterns, and also if you mix willpower(green) with fear(yellow) you would get lime (the ability to to use willpower and fear)

also alliteration is cool

We are a long ways away from being able to talk about full sagas in the DCU, but I think it’s better to ask the question now then wait till the last minute. We are already 2 years into phase 1 of the DCU, In the MCU Thanos was set up to be the main bad as early as the first avengers movie. That’s 5 years before his first true appearance in infinity war.

My question is, should we be focusing long term and if so who should be the big bad of the first saga?
We already have 3 likley candidates, 1 that I really don’t want, and 2 that I’m conflicted about.

Parallax: An underrated option but could lead to an amazing opportunity for marvel to make more villains well known (that aren’t Batman related) Parallax has the potential to be a saga level threat and if done right with Hal Jordan’s resurrection I think this could be an absolute banger.

Brainiac: This is a very safe choice as the first saga villain, he is well known by DC fans and the general audience. They are already setting him up in man of tomorrow as the main villain and I genuinely believe James Gunn will be smart enough to not waste Braniac in one single movie like marvel did with Ultron.

Darkside: I don’t want this…
Simply put it, he needs to be the second saga villain. Darkside is DC’s biggest villain and shouldn’t be wasted.

I got to attend the Toronto fan screening of Clayface, AMA

I’m gunna end the AMA part of this now but I will occasionally check for new comments for the next little bit

I know it's not going To Happen. But it would be so Fucking Cool

The common criticisms raised around this version is that, unlike the traditional version of Alfred that fans have loved across media, Serkis’ Alfred:-

1. Lacks warmth, loving foster-father like relationship with Bruce and comes across as tense, adversarial mentor trying to push Bruce into what he thinks is best for him.
2. Doesn’t address Bruce Wayne as the affectionate ‘Master Wayne’ or ‘Master Bruce’ rather simply ‘Bruce’.
3. Acts as stern guardian than the comforting, wise surrogate father that has been his traditional conception.
4. Leans too heavily into a gruff, scarred special-ops aesthetic, sacrificing the classic gentleman-butler charm.

What do you think of Andy Serkis’ Alfred? How would you want his portrayal to be changed, if at all, in ‘The Batman: Part II’? Would love to know the thoughts of y’all!