r/space • • 4d ago

Discussion All Space Questions thread for week of October 18, 2026

10 Upvotes

Please sort comments by 'new' to find questions that would otherwise be buried.

In this thread you can ask any space related question that you may have.

Two examples of potential questions could be; "How do rockets work?", or "How do the phases of the Moon work?"

If you see a space related question posted in another subreddit or in this subreddit, then please politely link them to this thread.

​

Ask away!


r/space • • 3h ago

Space Force scrambles as Musk’s SpaceX retires its major rocket

Thumbnail politico.com
434 Upvotes

SpaceX’s plans to retire its most popular rocket could jeopardize the United States’ ability to launch military satellites — a plight compounded by the Pentagon’s dependence on Elon Musk’s company.

SpaceX is by far the dominant player in the rocket business and indispensable to the military, dwarfing competitors and accounting for 85% of U.S. launches in 2025. The company is phasing out its Falcon 9 rocket to make way for Starship, a massive new vehicle that SpaceX says will be more efficient and profitable, but which many military satellites aren’t designed to fit.

…

The Space Force has said it’s open to eventually using SpaceX’s Starship. But there are engineering challenges to overcome because Starship is designed for “flat stack” satellites such as Starlink, while most military satellites are designed for a larger cargo bay. And it’s unclear when SpaceX will have the capacity to meet the Pentagon’s needs, given its plans to use Starship to build out orbital data-centers and other company priorities.


r/space • • 12h ago

SpaceX to attempt Starship catch on next flight, with eye on rapid cadence increase - “We have had significant constructive engagement with the FAA.”

Thumbnail
arstechnica.com
539 Upvotes

r/space • • 22m ago

Latest estimate for refuelings needed to support a Starship landing on the Moon? "Around 22" launches, according to NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel

Thumbnail
arstechnica.com
• Upvotes

On Thursday, the NASA Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel held its quarterly meeting, during which panel member Charlie Precourt (a former NASA astronaut) spoke about risks associated with the Artemis Program and landing humans on the Moon.

“With respect to Artemis IV, however, we’ve got a large number of firsts that reduce the likelihood of mission success,” Precourt said. “We need to keep our eyes on numerous required fuelings for the lander. I think the last estimate is around 22 flights.”

Precourt did not name Starship, but he could only be referring to the SpaceX vehicle. NASA’s other lunar lander for human missions, Blue Origin’s Blue Moon, will not be using orbital refueling as part of its initial mission design. The safety panel almost certainly would have obtained this estimated number of refuelings, 22, from discussions with NASA officials as part of its deliberations during quarterly meetings.

After I posted Precourt’s estimate on the social media site X, SpaceX founder Elon Musk replied that NASA’s safety panel estimate was not accurate. “That’s way too high,” Musk said. “Actual number will be more like 6 to 8.”

Seeking to bring down barriers:

To be fair to NASA and SpaceX, there remains a lot of uncertainty in how much cryogenic methane and liquid oxygen will boil off in orbit and how efficient the process of transferring propellants from one ship to another will be. But NASA can take the current performance of the lift capacity of Starship and determine the mass of propellant needed to support a lunar landing. For now, the space agency’s answer to the Starship question appears to be something on the order of two dozen Starship launches.

SpaceX, of course, is working hard to increase the flight rate of Starship. But even if SpaceX achieves “twice weekly” launches by the end of 2027, the company would still need about three months to fuel a depot for a Starship landing.

Precourt said the problem is a challenging one for NASA, and he praised the space agency chief, Jared Isaacman, and his team for trying to find ways to help SpaceX and Blue Origin be successful in their development of landers. NASA is still working toward a human lunar landing in 2028.

“With respect to schedule, I personally really appreciate the focus the administrator and the leadership team is putting on how to press schedule by bringing in resources to enable it to look for places where there are barriers,” he said.


r/space • • 5h ago

NASA giving update about Artemis moon plans on Oct. 23: Watch it live

Thumbnail
space.com
68 Upvotes

r/space • • 3h ago

ICEYE and Nokia partner with The Ministry of Defence of Ukraine to develop sovereign satcom capability

Thumbnail
iceye.com
28 Upvotes

r/space • • 5h ago

NASA JPL Looks to Next 90 Years of Innovation, Exploration - NASA

Thumbnail
nasa.gov
25 Upvotes

r/space • • 2h ago

Discussion NASA-sponsored National Academies committee recommends 4 locations for humans to begin investigating the moon

9 Upvotes

At the request of NASA, a new Consensus Study Report from the National Academies, “Human Exploration Across the Moon,” identifies high-value science destinations for short-duration human missions beyond the lunar poles.  

Dan Dumbacher, professor in Purdue University’s School of Aeronautics and Astronautics and co-chair of the committee tasked with compiling the report, presented the culmination of 18 months of research during a briefing on Oct. 21.   

“Humans for generations have aspired to explore, with the moon being the next logical step,” said Dumbacher, former chief executive officer of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. “This research outlines where humans could explore and why each location is important.”  

Each location offers opportunities to study questions regarding moon geology, space weather and radiation hazards, according to the report. Also recommended was the development of an observational tool that could be placed in orbit around the moon to assist in planning lunar missions and to provide continuous communications with future human habitats. The committee further addressed why human exploration would be more effective than robotic rovers and prioritized potential landing sites based on how humans would benefit and what important science questions would be answered.  

Read the National Academies’ report here. Purdue University’s coverage of the briefing can be found here.   


r/space • • 1d ago

Minnesota farmer finds suspected Chinese rocket debris in cornfield

Thumbnail usatoday.com
1.6k Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

Orionid meteor shower peaks overnight on Oct. 21-22 —Here's the best time to spot shooting stars...

Thumbnail
space.com
219 Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

NASA’s Mars orbiter fleet is getting old – here’s how that could affect future exploration

Thumbnail
theconversation.com
160 Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

KAI successfully demonstrates autonomous satellite operations in orbit

Thumbnail
mt.co.kr
48 Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

A supercomputer is about to launch to the moon aboard a rover named FLIP

Thumbnail
space.com
768 Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

Russian satellite, Cosmos 2612

Thumbnail
gizmodo.com
38 Upvotes

r/space • • 1d ago

NASA’s SR-1 Freedom Advances with Progress on Nuclear Power Module - NASA

Thumbnail
nasa.gov
86 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Mission Critical: Why Canada’s race to space is of national urgency

Thumbnail
rbc.com
617 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

A modern dynamo at Triton as a consequence of its capture by Neptune

Thumbnail
nature.com
168 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Water as we’ve never known it: Physicists test water beyond Earth-like conditions. UNLV research shows that water can change its structure under the scrutiny of intense pressure, giving us an idea of its appearance on extraterrestrial worlds...

Thumbnail
eurekalert.org
195 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Retired pilot insures that Neil Armstrong's boyhood home will be preserved and open for public tours.

Thumbnail
apnews.com
2.1k Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Space Rider test model lost following failed drop test

Thumbnail
europeanspaceflight.com
198 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Japan launches mission to bring home a piece of the Martian moon Phobos - The climax for MMX will come in 2029, when the spacecraft will attempt up to two landings on Phobos.

Thumbnail
arstechnica.com
277 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Three years into its second mission, NASA's OSIRIS-APEX sets its sights on 2029

Thumbnail
news.arizona.edu
67 Upvotes

r/space • • 14h ago

Discussion What if we are not alone but will never know. (Long)

0 Upvotes

Sometimes I think about the universe so much that I can't sleep. Tonight is one of those nights.

It's 3:09 in the morning. I'm lying in bed, staring at the ceiling, and my mind keeps circling around three ideas that seem separate at first, but the more I think about them, the more they connect. And the deeper I go, the harder it becomes to wrap my head around the reality we exist in.

1. There are parts of the universe we may never see.

The universe is expanding, and some distant regions are receding from us so quickly that light emitted from them today may never reach us. Not because those places don't exist. Not because there's nothing there. But because the space between us is expanding in a way that may permanently separate us.

Think about what that actually means.

There could be entire galaxies filled with stars, planets, oceans, and perhaps civilizations looking up at their own night skies, wondering the exact same things we are. They could be asking whether they're alone in the universe. They could be developing technology, discovering physics, searching for life.

And we might never know they exist.

Not because they're dead. Not because they've disappeared. But because the universe itself may have placed them beyond the reach of any information we could ever receive.

There could be an entire reality unfolding beyond our ability to witness it.

And we wouldn't even know what we were missing.

2. Every time we look into space, we're looking into the past.

The light from the Moon takes about 1.3 seconds to reach us. The light from the Sun takes about eight minutes. When we look at Andromeda, we're seeing it as it was approximately 2.5 million years ago.

We're not looking at the universe as it exists right now. We're looking at the information the universe has sent us, sometimes across billions of years.

Imagine a civilization in Andromeda developing a telescope powerful enough to observe Earth. The light reaching them today would show them a version of Earth from roughly 2.5 million years ago. They wouldn't see our cities, our technology, or our modern civilization. They'd see an ancient Earth, populated by our distant ancestors.

Meanwhile, we could be looking at their galaxy at the exact same moment, seeing a version of their world from millions of years in their past.

Both realities could be unfolding simultaneously, yet neither civilization would be witnessing the other as it currently exists.

And that makes me wonder: how much of what exists right now will never be seen by anyone? How many stars have already died whose light hasn't reached us? How many planets have formed, changed, or been destroyed while their light is still traveling through space?

The universe has a history that we can observe, but we can never experience all of it at once.

We're surrounded by evidence of what was, trying to understand what is.

3. What if we're not alone, but the universe makes it impossible for us to find out?

This is the thought that really gets me.

We search for extraterrestrial life, but we tend to imagine discovery as a matter of building a powerful enough telescope, developing faster spacecraft, or listening carefully enough for the right signal.

But what if the problem isn't simply that we haven't looked hard enough?

What if distance and time are fundamental barriers that no amount of technological progress can overcome?

Suppose a civilization exists on a planet in Andromeda right now. Suppose they've evolved, developed intelligence, built cities, discovered mathematics, and begun asking whether life exists beyond their world.

Perhaps they've been searching for millions of years. Perhaps they've sent signals into space. Perhaps they've looked at our galaxy and wondered whether any of those distant stars host life.

But the light we're receiving from their galaxy began its journey millions of years ago. And any signal we send today would take another 2.5 million years to arrive.

Even if we discovered undeniable evidence of their existence tomorrow, we wouldn't be discovering who they are today. We'd be discovering who they were millions of years ago.

They could have advanced far beyond anything we can imagine.

They could have gone extinct.

They could have never existed in the first place by the time our information reaches them.

We might discover a civilization's ancient history without ever knowing whether anyone is still there to tell it.

And that's assuming communication is possible at all.

Now put those three thoughts together.

There may be civilizations we can never observe because the expansion of space permanently separates us.

There may be civilizations whose existence we could eventually discover, but only through light that left their planets millions or billions of years ago.

And there may be civilizations so distant that, even if we knew they existed, the time required to exchange a single message would make any meaningful conversation almost impossible.

Somewhere out there, life could be looking back at us. But depending on the distance, they might be seeing Earth before humans even existed. Or they might be beyond the point from which any information could ever reach us.

And we could be doing exactly the same thing to them.

We could be looking at the same universe, asking the same questions, yet forever separated by the very laws that make the universe what it is.

And then there's the possibility that none of this is special to us.

Earth is one planet orbiting one star in one galaxy. Our galaxy is one among an almost incomprehensible number of galaxies in the observable universe.

We exist for a tiny fraction of cosmic history. Our civilization has existed for an almost negligible amount of time compared with the age of the universe. Our ability to observe the cosmos is limited by the technology we've developed, the time we've been here, and the physical laws we can barely begin to understand.

We have no definitive evidence that intelligent life exists elsewhere. But we also haven't searched every star, every planet, or every possible way life might exist.

So what if we're alone?

And what if we're not?

Both possibilities are terrifying in completely different ways.

If we're alone, then perhaps consciousness is an extraordinarily rare event in a universe that may otherwise be indifferent to it. Perhaps, for all we know, the ability to look at the stars and wonder why we're here is something that has happened only once.

And if we're not alone, then there could be countless other forms of consciousness scattered across the cosmos, each experiencing its own little corner of reality, each wondering whether it's alone, and each potentially separated from the others by distances that make discovery impossible.

Perhaps the universe is full of life, but the universe is so vast that most life will never know about any of the rest.

Perhaps being alive isn't the rarest thing. Perhaps being able to find one another is.

And here's the thought I can't get away from tonight:

The universe doesn't seem to owe us answers.

It doesn't promise that everything that exists can be discovered. It doesn't promise that every question has an answer we'll ever be capable of knowing. It doesn't promise that the truth is within our reach simply because we're curious enough to seek it.

There may be things that are real but permanently unknowable to us.

There may be events happening right now that no observer on Earth will ever witness.

There may be questions we can formulate but never answer, not because we're unintelligent, but because reality itself imposes limits on what we can know.

And the strangest part is that we're conscious beings inside this enormous system, capable of recognizing at least some of those limits.

We're pieces of the universe that somehow evolved the ability to question the universe.

Matter that became aware of itself.

A species on a small planet, staring into the darkness and trying to understand something vastly larger than itself.

I lie here thinking about all of this, and suddenly the ceiling above me feels almost irrelevant. The room, the house, the planet beneath me—all of it is real, all of it matters to us, yet it's such a tiny part of something so much larger that I struggle to comprehend it.

I don't know whether the universe is infinite. I don't know whether we're alone. I don't know how much of reality exists beyond what we can ever observe.

And maybe that's what keeps my mind going.

It's not that I think I can solve these questions tonight.

It's that I can finally begin to understand how enormous they really are.

Somewhere, right now, the universe is doing things we'll never witness. Somewhere, light is traveling toward places that may never receive it. Somewhere, there may be another mind looking into the darkness, asking whether anyone else is out there.

And we may never know.

Not tomorrow. Not in a thousand years. Maybe not ever.

So here I am, awake at 3:09 in the morning, on a planet spinning through space around an ordinary star, thinking about things so enormous that my brain can barely hold them.

And I keep coming back to one question:

What if the most unsettling thing about the universe isn't how much we don't know, but how much we might never be able to know?


r/space • • 2d ago

South Korea schedules 12 Nuri rocket launches by 2032, medium-lift methalox rocket by 2031, reusable rocket by 2035

Thumbnail
biz.chosun.com
50 Upvotes

r/space • • 2d ago

Japan launches Martian moon mission | NHK WORLD-JAPAN News

Thumbnail
nhk.or.jp
70 Upvotes