I was nominated to teach a brand new second year subject this semester. It garnered low enrolments (11 students). Fair enough, word hasn’t gotten around yet. But, it was actually very enjoyable to teach, and as the semester was progressing I thought the students were enjoying it.
As it was a new subject and a bit out of my regular wheelhouse, I went pretty easy on marking the early assignments, and was accommodating with a couple of attendance requests. One student asked to leave fifteen minutes early from lectures (they’re not compulsory and they are recorded by policy), due to an extra-curricular sports training.
I couldn’t really say no, although I did point out they needed to attend a couple of the lectures fully as assessments were being run in those ones, to which they agreed.
Another student needed flexibility for the compulsory tutorials but had an official accommodation so that was that.
The problem is, I think this sent signals to the other students that lecture attendance wasn’t important. I hate that we don’t have compulsory lecture attendance. It has never made sense to me, because this is where vital content is delivered.
Also, I tend to have relatively interactive lectures, which can’t be replicated through simply listening to the recorded version. Still, I don’t have any control over that, so I try and encourage attendance by having some assessments done in lecture time, which means that officially, students can’t schedule a competing class at the same time.
At the beginning of semester, I was so excited to tell them that we had some extra special guest speakers coming up down the line. I had managed to snag a couple of experts in the field, which was a real coup and I was delighted students would benefit from their expertise.
However as the semester progressed, students started missing lectures.
One of the earlier lectures, I was showing a film and decided to surprise them and turn it into a “movie night (well… afternoon)” replete with popcorn, snacks and drinks. I don’t have a budget, so I paid for these myself. About five students showed up. This was the first disappointment.
For the assessment where groups had to present hypothetical solution pitches to a problem, as soon as their group presented, a bunch walked out early, with half-arsed excuses about emergencies. The last group to present was left with only half a group as an audience.
Then only four students turned up for the final two guest speakers towards the end, even though for the final lecture, I had organised a world-leading expert to have a Q&A with us on their topic. I had even sent a reminder and explained how embarrassing it was for me to have students MIA for guest speakers. Four students! I was pretty crushed.
Because tutorials are compulsory, I had great attendance and everyone seemed really engaged, so I’m mystified about the lacklustre lecture attendance.
Then, they had to write a reflection piece on their projects. It was an in-class assessment and done in a way so that AI use was impossible. Their reflections are abysmal. Clearly not a lot of background work has gone into their project. They have a final part of the assessment which is an oral interview with me. I am not inclined to go easy on them for this final assessment (the project pitches, reflections and orals are all marked together).
I am trying hard not to be punitive, but I would be doing a disservice to them to NOT mention the issue of lack of professionalism. Problem is, I don’t have anything in the marking rubric about professionalism and participation. You bet your bottom dollar it will be there next year.
Still, should I give them a stern talking-to in the orals and say how we professors *notice* when they don’t turn up and don’t do the work? Or do I just write this semester off as a learning lesson for me, mark them to the rubric, and leave it be. I don’t want to sour the subject — I need bums on seats for the subject to continue!