Hi everyone. I work in programs (amongst various other hats) at a very small nonprofit with a local home base but serving an international community. I’ve worked there for about 10 months. I genuinely care about the mission and absolutely love my team and culture.
We work from home completely with no office and have a separate space only for holding event materials. We hold occasional local events at our home base and around the country that require in-person support and occasional travel.
When first accepting the role, it was listed as “mostly remote” and my supervisor worked remotely, which gave me some hope about location flexibility. However, as time as gone on, I’ve seen the need for in-person support, which has been difficult, as I have postponed a potential move with my long-term, long-distance partner because of how much I love this new job that has been my dream job for years.
I have became increasingly depressed with the distance and my current location/living situation. Additionally, my partner and I’s circumstances are changing soon, and it makes most sense for me to move to be with them toward the end of the year. I would love to keep my job if possible.
Much of my work can be done remotely (at least 90%), and my supervisor already works fully remotely after the organization accommodated that arrangement. However, we’re a team of only four, and I’m occasionally needed for on-site support for events, networking, meetings, etc., so that remaining 10% of in-person work can be very valuable, even if it’s only occasional. My supervisor’s remote arrangement means there’s one less person available too, especially with limited staff already.
I’m trying to decide whether to ask for a remote arrangement with planned travel for major events, propose a trial period, or offer to remain remotely employed while they find and train my replacement if a permanent arrangement isn’t feasible.
My biggest concern is that I’ve only been there about 10 months, so I don’t want to overstep or risk losing my job before I have another one lined up. At the same time, I feel I’ve gained organizational knowledge and taken ownership of important programs and processes, so I’d love to find a solution that works for both sides.
I’m curious everyone’s thoughts on:
Is it reasonable to ask for the same remote flexibility my supervisor was granted, given the differences in our responsibilities and putting us down another staff member for last-minute or occasional on-site needs?
Would offering to work remotely during a transition period be a reasonable compromise?
Would you raise this now, wait until a performance review, or secure another job first?
Are there other compromises I should consider?
I’d appreciate any advice on how to approach this conversation fairly without jeopardizing my current position. Thank you in advance!