r/news • • 8h ago

British man fined €3,000 for causing two-year-old son’s death in Cyprus | Cyprus

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/16/british-man-joshua-foster-fined-son-death-cyprus
860 Upvotes

139 comments sorted by

354

u/Elegant_Cockroach_24 8h ago

This appears to be the window: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxbEgJXfnKAeDxV8tNfMCopXmZoLObJa5R8mWNm7VYqkwmum7ePcUBAtYt&s=10

I can see how you wouldn’t expect it to be open. He sat his son on the edge while he pushed the button to the elevator

204

u/ascension2121 7h ago

Oh absolutely I can see where the confusion lay. Poor guy, poor baby

162

u/pyrotechnicmonkey 7h ago

Honestly I feel bad for the guy especially people who are not well travel don't understand how unlikely it would be for a window of that size to be open on a floor that high up. I'm guessing the rules are a little bit laxer in Cyprus.

19

u/KeyPhilosopher8629 5h ago

My student accom is on the first floor and it barely opens, I'd like to assume it's the same there (I have a Cypriot friend, I'd assume it isn't)

64

u/Gareth79 5h ago

Yeah somebody from the UK would absolutely not expect a window to be unsafe like that. It should be impossible for a child to fall without an adult taking some deliberate action like releasing a catch.

66

u/freckledotter 7h ago

Okay, yeah that's absolutely horrendous. Worst intrusive thought come to life.

28

u/OriginalChildBomb 7h ago

Christ, yeah. This poor family.

67

u/hellcat_uk 6h ago

Not a single window above ground floor should be able to be opened wide enough for a child to fall from. Especially not at the bottom of the window. Poor family. Cyprus sort out your H&S.

3

u/Short_Albatross_5402 3h ago

Really puzzled by that comment. You don’t want to be able to open windows more than a few cm past ground floor?

31

u/bismuth92 2h ago

Yes it is common in many countries for the windows on upper floors to open a maximum of 10 cm. Specifically to prevent children falling out. It wouldn't have even occurred to the father to check if a 4th floor window was wide open because that's a situation he never would have encountered in the UK.

-17

u/NickInTheMud 2h ago

And it’s more common in most countries that windows open all the way. Not every country babies its citizens.

•

u/Car-M1lla 20m ago

Yeah some countries just let them die lol. Won’t guilt anyone into having actual safety standards to save kids just like this one.

11

u/tulaero23 4h ago

Holy shit. Why will that be open

11

u/be-koz 1h ago

You may not expect it to be open, and you may even not be able to tell it was open from the point at which that photo was taken, but you would 100% know that it was open if you were close enough to sit your toddler on the edge.

•

u/tforce80 34m ago

I think that too. Plus… what parent puts a 2 year old on a ledge that high?

•

u/ManiacalShen 33m ago

That's what's getting me. The sound and airflow through an open window are pretty noticeable, especially with a window that huge. But maybe not if there were multiple other open windows around, meaning there was nothing remarkable to notice while approaching this one?

5

u/SomeoneNicer 2h ago edited 1h ago

In the article it states: he had been drinking (not to excess) and was holding his kid who excitedly pointed at the waterpark through the window and lost control of him. That's pretty different from assuming the window was closed / locked even though the article notes the blood alcohol level was low enough he shouldn't have been "more reckless".

21

u/Reasonable-Egg-1996 1h ago

Not sure why you are calling out that he had a pint (on holidays for God's sake) when it was deemed not a relevant factor in what happened in the actual report? very victim blaming towards this poor family.

0

u/SomeoneNicer 1h ago

Edited for clarity. My intention was to demonstrate that how things are worded matters to perception. The reply I responded to seems to create new facts to minimize what happened changing the narrative. My restatement of the actual article facts makes it sound worse. I 100% think it was an accident, I have no idea how factual the article is, but in terms of guilt parents do get charged for accidental deaths of their children depending on circumstances - it's always tragic and almost never clear cut - the least we can do is not change facts about cases to form a narrative.

2

u/Subject-Rain-9972 1h ago

Why can a window that large be opened at that hight at all, if there are no safety bars etc?

That looks wildly unsafe.

151

u/Djinn42 8h ago edited 8h ago

I remember the story of a grandpa who sat his granddaughter on the railing on a cruise ship to take a picture and she fell overboard. I don't remember if she died or they just never recovered her.

110

u/Pheighthe 8h ago

Died. Hit the concrete pier.

10

u/jesuisjens 8h ago

I am going to guess that you are probably not talking about the same girl. 

-2

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[deleted]

-5

u/jesuisjens 7h ago

You can believe what ever you want, probably won't change what has happened. 

10

u/wittor 8h ago

Royal Caribbean.

12

u/thegreycity 8h ago

I hate to break it to you…

78

u/AraiHavana 5h ago edited 1h ago

He placed his son on the sill of what he thought was a closed window but it was open and the kid fell out.

That guy must be absolutely destroyed and will possibly never get over this.

I fucking really feel for him.

139

u/Peach__Pixie 8h ago

This man will probably emotionally punish himself for the rest of his life. That's more than enough in a tragic accident. Hopefully his family can hold together and heal.

72

u/GoalSimilar2025 8h ago

It’s horrific all round. I’d probably need sectioning after that.

70

u/themagpie36 8h ago

Jesus, poor guy. I can't even imagine how it must feel to be at fault for your child's death and then have to relive it all multiple times in a courtroom.

-56

u/Hayabusa_Blacksmith 8h ago

i cant imagine being at fault for your child's death and NOT reliving it in a courtroom, either

21

u/themagpie36 7h ago

I fail to see the point you're trying to make.

-18

u/Hayabusa_Blacksmith 7h ago

my point is what alternative would there be realistically? and would it be so much better for him if he didnt have to go to court? he still dropped his baby off a building. is the trial so bad?

8

u/atypicaltype 6h ago

Your comment makes it sound like you have no idea how trauma works

-18

u/Hayabusa_Blacksmith 6h ago

courtrooms specifically are worse for trauma, got it thanks for clarifying

76

u/LyricalDucking 7h ago

Shouldn't have gone to court. This is just a tragedy.

45

u/EarthBounder 6h ago

Hotel covering their ass and making Dad legally culpable. I'm sure they're quietly changing the windows. Very weird situation, but... it is Cyprus.

14

u/Stoyfan 4h ago

This is a criminal case, not a civil one. It’s the prosecutors who get to decide whether it goes to court

442

u/emerikanSky 8h ago

Either it was an accident and we should all feel terrible for him or he did it intentionally and he should be in prison.

This is a very weird middle ground.

165

u/SubstantialPressure3 8h ago

Jail is not appropriate,” the judge said, telling the courtroom that as there was “clearly no intent to kill” she had decided against a custodial sentence and would instead order Foster to pay the fine.

17

u/R7SOA19281 6h ago

Not really, I think it’s very unlikely he did it on purpose, I think he lifted the child and rested him on a window he thought shut but it was open slightly and then pushed open and the child fell as he couldn’t grab quick enough

The reason for the fine is that’s the minimum charge for this case so had to have a charge, it’s the default

112

u/CharlieKonR 8h ago

Why would anyone think this might have been intentional?

25

u/thisismynewacct 8h ago

The person you’re responding to didn’t read the article

9

u/CharlieKonR 8h ago edited 2h ago

Seems not. It’s a heartbreaking story.

-31

u/Shes_dead_Jim 8h ago

I did actually. That’s how I knew to make a joke about dropping his son out of a window. Context clues

111

u/Shes_dead_Jim 8h ago

If I come to you and say “hey I was carrying my son and I wanted to show him the view and didn’t know the window was open and oop butter fingers” would you think I threw my son out a window or accidentally dropped my son out a window?

221

u/ClemFandango25 8h ago

...if you said 'oop butter fingers'?

81

u/Shes_dead_Jim 8h ago

Yeah like when you drop something. Like your son

62

u/DAVENP0RT 7h ago

I once dropped a hot dog with three bites left and cried.

34

u/THR 7h ago

Straight to jail

5

u/Osiris32 6h ago

For the crying or the hot dog?

•

u/N1cK01 42m ago

For the butter fingers

6

u/etherized_fly 4h ago

5 second rule

0

u/rainbowgeoff 6h ago

Important context: were you intoxicated?

I too have gone to the depths of despair when my questionable food choices on the way back from getting knackered have been fumbled.

•

u/ripyourlungsdave 1m ago

So there's this movie called The Coffee Table..

31

u/athena06 8h ago

If you phrased it like that.....

59

u/SleaterK7111 8h ago

Your honour my client wishes to plead "oop butter fingers".

9

u/Fallouttgrrl 6h ago

If the fingers don't grip you must acquit

-1

u/robserious21 8h ago

5 second rule doesnt apply here?

101

u/CharlieKonR 8h ago

Having read the story, I think it’s beyond implausible to imagine that this man intentionally threw his son out of the window. Nobody involved is alleging that. It’s a tragedy, pure and simple.

-69

u/Kriemhilt 8h ago

If it was

a tragedy, pure and simple

then why did he plead guilty to

causing death through a reckless, rash or dangerous act

This insane tabloid binary of "it was either deliberate or a tragic accident" needs to stop. You need to stop doing it.

Negligence is a real thing. There's a huge middle-ground between murder and, as another poster says, "oop butterfingers".

10

u/surnik22 7h ago

A reckless or dangerous act can still be a tragedy. Those are mutually exclusive.

Hell, most literary “tragedies” are specifically about someone suffering consequences based on a character flaw.

Someone being reckless and that leading to them losing a child is a tragedy

26

u/spacetimebear 7h ago

How many dad's have never lifted their kid up to look at something interesting? Shits tragic as fuck.

-18

u/Kriemhilt 7h ago

Sweet Jesus the literacy in here.

Yes, it's tragic. My dad lifted my up when I was small and I can very easily imagine that going wrong.

That doesn't make the false binary... not false. It's not either deliberate or a tragedy. It can be both, it can be neither, it can be a careless accident or negligence. Being tragic doesn't also mean it wasn't avoidable.

14

u/spacetimebear 7h ago

You're right. Should have done a risk assessment first and gotten approval from hotel management. For someone trying to act smart you're saying some dumb shit.

-18

u/WalnutOfTheNorth 7h ago

Doesn’t seem that hard to understand.

10

u/spacetimebear 7h ago

No-one said anything about not understanding.

→ More replies (0)

37

u/CharlieKonR 7h ago

Guy made a negligent / reckless (however you’d like to characterize it) mistake, thinking a window was secured when it was not and inadvertently exposed his child to a fatal fall. He’ll be paying for that mistake the rest of his life. If that doesn’t qualify as a tragedy for both of them, I don’t know what would. We are all human and all have lapses of judgement. Fortunately, for most of us, the lapses don’t result in the loss of a child. Having compassion for this guy (while still recognizing his role) is entirely appropriate.

-24

u/Kriemhilt 7h ago

Quibbling over your use of a false binary (which I see a lot and really object to) has nothing to do with the father, the child, or compassion or anything else.

15

u/CharlieKonR 6h ago edited 3h ago

I was responding to speculation that the dad might have intentionally thrown his son out of the window. Please excuse me for not simultaneously anticipating your particular kink about your “false binary”. I’m pretty sure I’ve already acknowledged that the dad had a role in this tragedy.

45

u/internThrowawayhelp 7h ago

It was a tragic accident that his actions caused. "Causing death through a reckless, rash or dangerous act." Does not require intention. Murder requires intention.

He's not denying that his actions caused his sons death. He has pleaded guilty for doing so. But it was a tragic and unfortunate accident of his doing.

-37

u/Kriemhilt 7h ago

I understand that it was accidental, and obviously it was and is tragic.

I'm pointing out the extremely popular and misleading false binary "it was either deliberate or just an accident" as if being accidental is an excuse.

This is consistently used to erase the middle ground of carelessness, negligence, and wilful negligence in reporting & commenting.

5

u/CthulhuLies 3h ago

It's either deliberate or unintentional. That isn't a false binary those are the two options.

If it's deliberate it's murder.

If it's unintentional it's not clear without further evidence.

A pure accident is something a reasonable person wouldn't have been able to foresee.

Negligence requires you to not act with a "reasonable" standard of care. Ie would we expect a reasonable person to be able to foresee the likely consequences and thus avoid it?

There is gross negligence and slight negligence but it just alters what we could consider the standard of care of to be.

Lastly there is wilful / wanton negligence. Which is like they can prove you know your actions would put people in danger but consciously disregarded that fact.

There is some degree of negligence ie if you don't hang your kid out the window you can't drop them, but did he consciously disregard that likely possibility or is it possible he didn't perceive it to be an actual risk?

16

u/Confident-Ship-5062 7h ago

dude who has never heard of concept of negligent death

-4

u/Kriemhilt 7h ago

Am literally discussing negligence, are you reading a different comment to the one I wrote?

6

u/Confident-Ship-5062 7h ago

im strictly replying to your "then why did he plead guilty to" comment about it being an accident.

It was a tragedy and clearly not intentionial, nobody is insinuating its murder. He feels guilt by letting his son fall out of a window. Any parent would be burdened with guilt, aka negligence.

3

u/jovial_rebel 7h ago

It was a tragedy, and it was reckless, which is why he plead guilty you fucking moron.

-30

u/robserious21 8h ago

If thats the case this man is stupid enough to need to be required to wear a helmet 24/7 for the rest of his life for his own safety.

2

u/hattorihanzo5 7h ago

Ask Eric Clapton...

4

u/jovial_rebel 7h ago

People like to assign malice, especially online.

14

u/stopcounting 8h ago

It was the minimum sentence, the article says

9

u/Freckles93 8h ago

Probably pushed for by the hotel to avoid liability and subsequent payout for unsafe windows.

2

u/phantom_gain 1h ago

Why would you do this intentionally?

-6

u/Timeline_Change 4h ago

He got off because he's wealthy.

93

u/Probablynotspiders 8h ago

They didn't find him guilty of any wrongdoing but he has to shell out 3k ...for why exactly?

100

u/wpgsae 8h ago

He plead guilty to the charge of causing death through a reckless, rash or dangerous act. The fine he received is the minimum sentence for that charge.

45

u/GreenHorror4252 8h ago

They didn't find him guilty of any wrongdoing

He pleaded guilty, according to the article.

70

u/Probablynotspiders 8h ago

Guilty of holding his child to look at a window. Did not realize the window was open, kid tumbled out of his arms

It's a nightmare scenario but not like he threw the kid out the window

2

u/GreenHorror4252 8h ago

I agree. He didn't have any ill intent, but he was negligent so I think a slap on the wrist is appropriate.

84

u/Probablynotspiders 8h ago

Wouldn't you say your child dying is ENOUGH of a terrible consequence?!

Why pay a fine? Ugh

34

u/jaytee158 8h ago

Minimum sentence likely to act as something that covers court costs. Just no wiggle room. I agree he paid for it in a more serious way already

12

u/Probablynotspiders 8h ago

There's gotta be more room for compassion in the law, this feels too brutl

9

u/A_mexicanum 7h ago

On the other hand: If I were responsible for my childs death, I couldn't care less about €3000

17

u/romanroarer 7h ago

Yes but it’s unbearably cruel to make a grieving parent go through the procesd

-1

u/jaytee158 7h ago

Which part? The court case or the fine? Because he was found guilty of a crime.

It makes complete sense when you see cases like this where the grandmother accidentally killed two grandchildren years apart https://www.fox13news.com/news/florida-grandmother-be-sentenced-babys-hot-car-death.amp

→ More replies (0)

6

u/Gareth79 5h ago

The authorities likely did it to avoid having to admit that their building safety regulations are lax.

0

u/notanothergav 7h ago

It's criminal negligence. They have to give him the punishment prescribed by law.

•

u/SnooRadishes9685 48m ago

Because someone lost their life?

17

u/kittenklutz 8h ago

Because that’s the minimum sentence the judge could hand out.

25

u/AlecTheBunny 6h ago

I'd considering ending it if I was the primary reason for the death of my own kid.

7

u/hellahanners 1h ago

There was a very harrowing story from a few years ago about a father who forgot his infant/toddler in the car and the child died. He did end up killing himself, essentially as soon as he realized what had happened. His wife talked about it extensively on a podcast and man… I can’t even imagine the pain they both experienced, but especially those few hours where the father knew that he was the cause of their child’s death... It makes my stomach hurt to think about these cases. I really feel for this man. He’s got to be in agony.

6

u/notie547 4h ago

same, life would be ruined forever.

1

u/UnderH20giraffe 2h ago

Have a 2 year old. Would def apologize to my wife and then end it.

2

u/Tiny_Rat 1h ago

He's got a second child...

•

u/Worldly-Ingenuity843 8m ago

Which may be the reason why he didn't end his own life. 

10

u/Boniouk84 7h ago

If its intentional the jail. If its not, why does any money changing hands make ANY sense?

•

u/Worldly-Ingenuity843 6m ago

Prosecutor needed another case to meet this year's quota /s

But the real reason is probably that negligence is a crime. If you break the law, you should be prosecuted, and depending on the degree of the crime, the sentence can be more lenient. 

26

u/ChipHazard1 8h ago

Christ that's rough man. Poor guy

1

u/Exciting_Policy8203 2h ago

Why the fuck are the 4th floor windows of a hotel hallway able to be opened in the first place?

•

u/Subject-Rain-9972 58m ago

Exactly. I have read about this case several times now and I can for the life of me not understand what the fuck? That hotel is liable. A window that high should either be unable to open or fitted with safety bars ex.

•

u/[deleted] 55m ago

[deleted]

•

u/Exciting_Policy8203 48m ago

But hotels aren’t made for locals, it’s an insane hazard, and a quick google results show that window related falls do happen and many places have laws to prevent shit like this from happening.

•

u/Immediate_Honey9593 2m ago

Oh god, I have windows like this and it’s always scared me how they can just open all the way. I’ve put child locks on all windows. Can’t believe this is allowed at a hotel.

-3

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[deleted]

2

u/wpgsae 8h ago

The fine is the minimum sentence for the charge that he plead guilty to.