Trump’s ban on three news outlets ran into a federal judge’s order, but reporters still had trouble getting through the White House gates. And while the dispute played out, the absence of regular TV crews had created an awkward problem for his own broadcasts.

When criticism of government becomes difficult to express or appears hidden from public view, the First Amendment questions matter. This is the documented record of what appeared on Vicksburg Police Department’s public-facing Facebook presence and why citizens are paying attention.

Vicksburg, Mississippi is a small city, but it has developed a surprisingly large First Amendment controversy. The petition began after three separate publicly recorded encounters involving people filming Vicksburg police, including encounters that resulted in arrests and allegations of excessive or improper treatment of the cameramen.

Since then, the questions have only expanded to public access, police accountability, complaint procedures, government social media, and how criticism of local officials is handled. Seventy-five people have now signed the petition asking Mississippi officials to review the documented concerns.

Whatever conclusion people ultimately reach, the underlying videos and government records deserve scrutiny. In a town the size of Vicksburg, 75 people asking the same government to take a closer look is becoming difficult to dismiss as just one person’s complaint.

A Native friend of mine, Indigenous to Oregon, wants to establish a psilocybin church, with an OHA-approved ceremonial training program, and licensed service center grounded in Indigenous practice.

This "2022 Oregon DOJ memorandum" https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cCzeOG4KXqhvHrA6Dd4yC8kSosl0ub_x/view?usp=drivesdk analyzed a proposed entheogenic pathway addressing Indigenous traditions, affordability, ceremonial practice, and treatment of mushrooms as sacred.

What the agencies subsequently created raises serious questions.

First, HECC isn't mentioned anywhere in the Measure 109 statutes. Yet OHA now requires training programs to provide HECC documentation showing career-school licensure or that licensure isn't required.

Religious institutions can be statutorily exempt. But HECC now says it lacks authority to issue exemption determinations for the exempt categories. This creates an apparently impossible document requirement that could force a church into the commercial career-school model.

OHA also turned the statute's prohibition against giving away/discounting psilocybin when bundled with another retail sale into a categorical rule against giving it away, effectively requiring the sacrament itself to be commercially sold.

He isn't seeking exemption from safety or licensing requirements. He wants to participate lawfully without restructuring his church as a commercial school or treating its sacrament as a retail commodity.

I'm curious how people here view the First Amendment implications, particularly in light of DOJ's memorandum.