She posted a video today, October 6th 2026, discussing her cardiac history, and there are some interesting discrepancies when you compare it with what she wrote contemporaneously in April 2022.
On April 27, 2022, immediately after a failed procedure, she posted a detailed explanation. She said that because of her dysautonomia, her body reacted differently to medication and sedation. She said the first dose of sedation didn’t work, so the anesthesiologist gave her a second dose. She then said: “they gave me so much sedation that my body completely relaxed and my connective tissue gave out”and claimed that this caused her hips, knees, shoulders, and several ribs to dislocate/sublux on the procedure table. She then explained why the ablation couldn’t be completed: “The doctors performed an EP study and we’re unable to recreate my Atrial tachycardia and recurring AFIB and as a result weren’t able to go through with the ablation.”And then she gave a specific explanation for why the arrhythmias couldn’t be reproduced “The theory is that my body was too sedated to react to the medication so it was impossible to re-create my heart arrhythmias.”
Four years later, she is telling a somewhat different story. She says she was told that the ablation failed because she was “double dosed” with sedation. But she now says that she has subsequently learned that this isn’t something doctors support as an explanation for why an atrial tachycardic event couldn’t be reproduced. And then she says: “I STILL HAVE NO IDEA WHAT HAPPENED ON THAT DAY.” That’s a pretty significant change in certainty.
In 2022, she presented the sedation explanation as “the theory” explaining the failed EP study. In 2026, she is telling her audience that she now knows that explanation isn’t medically supported and that she has no idea what actually happened.
So her own current account essentially calls her earlier explanation into question.
Then there’s today’s cardiology appointment. She says she went to a cardiologist today because she had discovered old cardiac information that had apparently been overlooked. She says: “I was told they had found 200 counts of AFIB on the monitor from four years ago”and that doctors had apparently disagreed for years about whether those readings were actually AFIB. She then says: “today, they found notes and there was the proof I’ve had AFIB, atrial tachycardia and different form of SVT this entire time.”But earlier in the same story, she says that the cardiologist wouldn’t see her because she has POTS.
She says she had repeatedly told them that she wasn’t there to be treated for POTS, but that POTS was repeatedly put down on the referral. And then, near the end, she says: “I didn’t get to meet with the doctor.”
So I’m confused. If she wasn’t actually seen by the cardiologist because the office considered POTS to be the reason for the referral and wouldn’t see her, who exactly reviewed the old records and discovered the “proof” today?
It’s certainly possible that a nurse, medical assistant, referral department, or another staff member accessed her existing records without her having a completed physician appointment. It’s also possible that she already had access to the old reports herself and is describing something she learned while trying to get the appointment because she plugged it into ChatGPT or something…
So I’m not saying this is impossible. But her wording makes it sound like:
“I went to a cardiologist today, they found the old records, they confirmed these diagnoses, but I never actually got to meet the cardiologist.”
If that’s what happened, I’d really like to understand exactly who reviewed the records and what documentation they actually found. There’s also an important distinction between: “A monitor report contained 200 events labeled AFIB” and“I definitively had 200 clinically confirmed episodes of AFIB.”
Likewise, finding an old note mentioning AFIB, atrial tachycardia, or another SVT doesn’t necessarily establish that every one of those diagnoses was confirmed in the way she’s presenting them now. We’d need to see the actual report/records.
The suspicious part isn’t simply that she has multiple heart conditions. It’s the way the narrative changes depending on when she’s telling it. In 2022, she gave a very detailed explanation for the failed ablation and described a specific physiological mechanism. In 2026, she says she now knows that explanation isn’t supported and says she has no idea what actually happened. At the same time, she’s now saying that old records apparently contain evidence of multiple arrhythmias that she says doctors failed to tell her about despite saying she didn’t actually get to meet with the cardiologist who supposedly uncovered this information TODAY!!
Maybe there’s a perfectly innocent explanation for all of this. But if we’re taking her claims at face value, I’d expect the underlying records to make this pretty easy to clarify:
What exactly did the 2022 EP study report say?
What did the electrophysiologist document as the reason the arrhythmia couldn’t be induced?
Was excessive sedation actually documented as a theory?
What did the original cardiac monitor report actually label as AFIB?
Were the “200 counts” actually AFIB episodes, or monitor detections/alerts that were later questioned?
What are the “different forms of SVT” she says were discovered?
What exactly did the recent cardiology office review?
Who reviewed those records if she never actually saw the cardiologist?
What did the old echocardiogram actually say about the mitral valve and the other valve?
What did the supposedly “urgent” referral actually say?
Those records would answer most of this. We’re getting increasingly elaborate retrospective explanations for old medical events, while her own newer account sometimes contradicts the certainty of her earlier account.
Below is a transcript of the video:
“I’ve already cried a lot today. I’ve had several heart conditions for four years. I have medical PTSD, and talking about anything uncertain before I’ve had time to process and decide how I’m going to cope is one of my worst fears. I do not like crying online. So today I’m being brave and talking about this when it’s something I just didn’t want to talk about.
People will come online just to invalidate someone’s reality, and I don’t know how to process that because it’s already taken me long enough to trust my own emergent symptoms.
In 2022, I went to a cardiac doctor, and they referred me to an electrophysiologist because they found that I had atrial tachycardia and needed an ablation. So they attempted to do that ablation, and it failed. The reasoning that they gave me was that they double-dosed me with sedation. But I’ve since then found out that’s not even something that doctors support as a theory of a reason to not be able to recreate an atrial tachycardic event. I still have no idea what happened on that day, but attempted ablations fail all the time, so it’s not that crazy. So that was fun to learn.
My scan from two years ago shows I developed mitral valve leaflet thickening and regurgitation. Another one of my heart valves has regurgitation.
I remember getting a phone call saying it was urgent, but there was an insurance issue and they couldn’t get me in. And I became homeless, and it was just this trickle-down effect, and so it just kept getting put on the back burner. My heart wasn’t doing anything I wasn’t already used to it doing, so I didn’t think it could possibly be that urgent. I wasn’t feeling anything that was excessive. I have POTS, and I have a specialist at Stanford that has continuously been treating that. The only thing I haven’t done is start infusions because I’m not ready to take that next step. This also, to my understanding, should have nothing to do with structural or electrical issues with the heart, so it’s irrelevant. But also, there is nowhere in my area that’s a network that will even take that order. So I would have to essentially move because those are biweekly appointments of infusions, and getting in-home visits isn’t an option in the area. There is no facility that provides that service.
But I went to a cardiologist today that, because I had POTS, I was not able to be seen there. I’ve told them numerous times I wasn’t going there to be treated for that. They continuously put that down in the referral.
But of course, the craziest part of this story is that I was told they had found 200 counts of AFIB on the monitor from four years ago, and I had doctors go back and forth ever since then on whether or not that was true or not.
I had known about the AFIB but was told, ‘It’s no big deal if you can’t even feel it. It’s probably not even a good reading.’ And today, they found notes, and there was the proof I’ve had AFIB, atrial tachycardia, and different form of SVT this entire time. And nobody told me.
I knew about the atrial tachycardia and the AFIB, but I was gaslit on the other form of SVT. And right now, I don’t even know what that was because I didn’t get to meet with the doctor.
I have to wait for another month, even though this visit was planned three and a half, actually four months ago, and here we are waiting again. So yeah. That’s my pickle.I don’t really know what to do from here. I don’t know what the symptoms are coming from, what condition, what can you do?”