r/bourbon • • 2h ago

Review #185: Four Roses 2022 Limited Edition

Post image
39 Upvotes

Today we're checking out the 2022 Limited Edition Small Batch from Four Roses! Being one of my top 5 favorite distilleries, Four Roses' yearly LE is one that's always high on my hunt list and this 2022 was actually the first I was ever able to get my hands on. The 2022 LE features a blend of the following:

  • 14 year OESF
  • 14 year OESV
  • 15 year OESK
  • 20 year OBSV

Some pretty serious age in this blend! Let's sit down and see how she is.

Taken: Neat in a Glencairn, rested for 10 minutes.

Age: Blend of bourbons ranging from 14 - 20 years old

Proof: 109

Nose: Bouquet of red fruits and floral notes. Sometimes I get cherries and strawberries, other times raspberries. All in all those red fruits with floral undertones come across very nicely. Brown sugar, cinnamon, and oak are also present. Giving the glass a swirl just enhances the red fruits and brings out some sweet vanilla, baking spices, and more oak. Wonderful aromas on this which is typically the case with these LE's from Four Roses.

Palate: Fairly subdued compared to the nose. Medium viscosity of sweet oak, raspberries, cherries, cinnamon, and vanilla cream. These notes all remain strong throughout the pour with some added baking spices that start to show up when the glen is nearly empty. Everything does feel well balanced which I appreciate.

Finish: Medium finish of raspberries, cinnamon, and drying oak.

I feel like "mellow" is too cliché for a Four Roses bottle, but that's really how I'd describe the 2022 Limited Edition, especially compared to how potent the aromas were. Still though, this delivers. It doesn't top the 2023 nor 2024 as my favorite Four Roses LE, but what's here is still fantastic. The notes you get from the first sip remain just as prominent when you get to the final sip and as someone who is all over any pour that's deep with red fruits, this checks that box in a big way.

t8ke scale: 8.2/10 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists.

5 | Good | Good, just fine.

6 | Very Good | A cut above.

7 | Great | Well above average.

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite.

10 | Perfect | Perfect.


r/bourbon • • 3h ago

Review: Weller Special Reserve 2014 vs 2023

Post image
38 Upvotes

Background:

Are you someone who experiences an uncontrollable urge to tell people baseline Weller bourbons used to sit on the literal liquor-store floor? And you had enough change from a 20-dollar bill after buying it to get a six-pack of Coke at your local Piggly Wiggly to mix that bottom-shelf trash with? This review is for you!

It's a little more difficult to feel smug about it now, as Weller Special Reserve is once again a shelf product in a lot of places, aided by the cooling market, increased competition, and expanded production. Buffalo Trace has been on a massive upgrade kick since 2015, building new warehouses, replacing boilers, adding new cookers and fermenting tanks, and activating a new still that doubled the distillery's output in 2023.

If the current trends continue, a bourbon like Special Reserve will likely achieve a similar level of availability it had in the mid-2010s in a few years. Adjusted for inflation, it costs about the same (20 bucks then vs 30 today). But how will it taste? And was the bottom-shelf designation really deserved?

I like doing "then vs now" comparisons, so when I had a chance to buy a 2014 bottle of Special Reserve for 80 bucks, I jumped on it to do just that. To my surprise, I realized those old-style bulbous bottles had a higher-than-expected secondary, often going for as much as 200-300 dollars (even higher for the 12 and Antique 107).

I would understand chasing the Stitzel-Weller versions from the 1990s and earlier, or the new Bernheim ones from the early 2000s, or even those from before 2011, when the expression lost its 7-year age statement. But a NAS, entry-level 90-proofer from a decade ago? Let's see if I've found a hidden gem. No special significance to using a 2023 bottle, that's what the store had when I bought it this year.

Tasted neat in copitas; first round semi-blind.

2014:

On the nose, oak, stone fruit, apple, butterscotch, vanilla frosting, honey, maple, almond. On the palate, pie crust, butterscotch, sugar cookie, dark cherry. Medium-long finish, vanilla, baking spice, oak.

2023:

Earthy cinnamon, cherry, sharpie, brown sugar, honey on the nose. On the palate, raw dough, cherry pit, honey, a little vanilla and caramel. Medium-short finish, cinnamon and clove, slightly bitter oak.

Rating: (t8ke scale for reference below): 

2014: 6.5

2023: 5

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but many things I’d rather have

5 | Good | Good, just fine

6 | Very Good | A cut above

7 | Great | Well above average

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional

9 | Incredible | An all-time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Thoughts:

There were no surprises with the 2023 version, it tasted like every other bottle of Special Reserve I've had in the last few years. I've outlined my thoughts on where it sits in the current Weller line-up here. If you think it's a bottom-shelf bottle, may I recommend some "aged 36 months" Old Crow? How about an 80-proof Ancient Age? Or a 49-percent grain neutral spirit Kentucky Gentleman? If you don't like WSR, that's fine, but it's not a bottom-shelf whiskey by any objective metric, with plenty of depths to plumb beneath it.

I would object even more strenuously to calling the 2014 Special Reserve a bottom-shelf bourbon. I don't want to oversell how good it was, and I wouldn't shell out 200 bucks for it. People overpay for the bottle shape in this case, and there are 50 other whiskeys I'd put in front of it on my wish list. But I'm happy with paying 80 just for the contrasting experience, and it was unquestionably better than the 2023 bottle. It sat just under the current C.Y.P.B. for me. Not bad for a findable, affordable bourbon that went for the equivalent of less than 30 dollars today.

I know it's a completely different mash bill, but it reminded me of the 2012 Elmer T. Lee I accidently stumbled into. The flavors were deeper and more rounded. Where are the once ubiquitous butterscotch, fragrant vanilla, rich fruit? Why do you need to jump a price tier or three to get to the quality that used to be present in mid-shelf staples?

Are we ready to have a conversation about how bourbon from even 10-15 years ago is tasting differently to its modern counterparts? Don't tell me about "old-bottle effect" on the stuff from 2014. Or a 2015 Michter's. Or a 2015 Elijah Craig. Or a 2016 Rebel 10. Or a 2008 Baker's. I could go on.

So there you have it: The label got better, the price stayed the same, the whiskey got worse. Let's hope we're not saying the same thing in a few years' time.

Thanks for reading and cheers!


r/bourbon • • 38m ago

Review 131, Old Fitzgerald 10 Year Bottled in Bond

Post image
• Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 4h ago

REVIEW #29: Michters Toasted Barrel Finish Rye 2026 (108.2 proof)

Post image
40 Upvotes

Price: $190

Nose: pretty big, aromas of sweet oak, brown sugar, chocolate, rye, leather, very slight barrel char, werthers candy. Phenomenal.

Palate: pretty big, sweet oak, carmelized brown sugar, chocolate, vanilla, rye mixing in with everything, pretty thick on the mouth feel, a little bit of, cherry, slight pepper.

Finish: long, nothing falls off from the palate...it just keeps going. some barrel char or a smokey note comes in at the tail end, but it's pretty muted.

My thoughts: baaaannnggeeerrr. No way around it. It's so damn delicious and satisfying. It's not the most complex rye I've had nor at the proof I like, but when it's this good, I simply don't care. This is gonna be a problem for me. And at that price point? Take my money!

Rating: 8.8/10


r/bourbon • • 6h ago

Review Widow Jane The Vaults Aged 15

Post image
25 Upvotes

2024 Release Batch 7 99Proof A blend aged in Amburana. POUR: dark amber color, light viscosity, poured neat in a GC and rested for 5 mins. NOSE: Ripe banana, heavy vanilla extract, nutmeg, cinnamon, subtle gloves, subtle ginger, ghost corn. PALATE: moist banana nut bread, vanilla banana muffin with light bourbon glaze. FINISH: spicy heat lingers a bit like a high rye does. SUMMARY: Unique, semi- extraordinary, desert sipper, definitely different, and well crafted. No regrets on the $250. Grateful for the experience. I will finish this turn friends onto it but would not chase again.


r/bourbon • • 2h ago

Review #79 - Founders 1867 Single Barrel Selection, “Big Time Pick #4”

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

In the glass: Founders 1867 Single Barrel Selection, “Big Time Pick #4”, Barrel #134, 30 gallon

Distillery: R.M. Rose Company

Proof entered into barrel: 117.3

ABV: 68.35%

Exit Proof: 136.7

Age: 7 Years 10 Months

Mashbill: 75% Corn, 15% Rye, 10% Malted Barley

Nose: Barrel char, spice, rich oak, burnt caramel, there’s some cherry cola vibes, rich sugars… I love the noses on these 30 gallon founders picks!

Palate: Toasted oak, raspberry jam, almost a cane sugar sweetness, blackberries, burnt brown sugar, and cherries. This such a sweet and rich pour that has absolutely nothing wrong with it.

Finish: More of that barrel char, rich oak, little bit of chocolate that fades almost as quickly as you taste it, molasses, and cherry syrup. The hug and finish rivals just about any Kentucky bourbon out there… The empty glass yields tropical fruits like pineapple and mango, very very sweet!

Final thoughts: I have 2 backups of this one and am very very happy about that. This is one of my favorite bourbons of 2026…

Rating: 9/10


r/bourbon • • 7h ago

Review # 040 — Rowan’s Creek Straight Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey

Post image
12 Upvotes

On paper, this amounts to essentially being “barrel select” Old Bardstown Estate: they carry the same mash bill, same barrel entry proof, and essentially the same proof (101 vs 100.1 here). Master Distiller Drew Kulsveen called this his favorite bourbon in a recent interview, though he was unclear if he meant the current iteration that he oversees or the prior sourced releases from Kentucky Bourbon Distillers that carried a up to 12-year age statement. Let’s see where this falls for me.

Price Paid: $49.99 before tax

Score: 6.5/10

The Background
Distillery: Willett Distillery

ABV: 50.05% (100.1 proof)

Age: NAS

Mash Bill: 72% corn, 13% rye, 15% barley

Other: batch 24-18, 125 barrel entry proof

The Experience
Nose: floral, cinnamon, cola, melted butter, oak. This is complex and took a while to read. This is an improvement over the 4-year Family Estate Small Batch that I reviewed and smells like it might carry a decent age statement.

Palate: graham cracker, black tea, oak char. The cola and floral notes are not as present in the mouth as I had hoped and the oak takes over.

Finish: muted cinnamon, oak. The spice shows up at the end, very smooth and typical Willett.

The Summary
This is clearly an older cousin of the WFE Small Batch. I appreciate the mature oak presence — which dominates — but I’m missing the influence from the blended high-rye mash bill (this is low-rye only). Apart from Old Bardstown Estate, this also shares a mash bill with Noah’s Mill, which I also prefer over this. This is oakier but less sweet and spicy, which makes sense since it is 14 proof points lower.

At $50, this is an average value proposition, though it would be tricky to convince someone to buy this over, say, Knob Creek 9 year or Wild Turkey 8 year. This has the distinct finish of Willett products that keeps me coming back for more but it is a bit funky. If you’re curious how this fits in the Willett hierarchy, I would say this: buy this if you prefer an oak-forward flavor profile; buy Family Estate if you prefer floral notes, more heat, less water, and essentially a more accessible version of Stagg; buy Noah’s Mill if you want something more sweet, cinnamon, and unique. Pure Kentucky and Johnny Drum sit in their own little corner that I’m hoping to explore more later in the year. I was not super impressed by the bottle of Pure Kentucky I had (even though, on paper, it should have been better than Johnny Drum).

T8KE Scoring System Used for Relevancy and Consistency:
0 | Unscored | New Make Spirit or Personal Selection.
1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.
2 | Poor | I wouldn't consume by choice.
3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but many things I'd rather have.
5 | Good | Good; just fine.
6 | Very Good | One cut above.
7 | Great | Well above average.
8 | Excellent | Exceptional.
9 | Incredible | An all-time favorite.
10 | Perfect | Perfection.


r/bourbon • • 23h ago

Review #240 - Old Grand Dad 114 Single Barrel

Post image
138 Upvotes

Whiskey: Old Grand Dad 114 Single Barrel

Distiller: Jim Beam

Instagram: Barrel & Proof https://www.instagram.com/barrel_and_proof?igsh=czJ2MzhybG42MG9j&utm_source=qr 

ABV: 57.0%

Age: 7 Years

Price: $45 (Spokane, Washington)

Tasting:  Neat in Bourbon Trail glass, blind tasting, rested for 10 minutes. Bottle opened for 2 months.

__________________________________

Nose: Cantaloupe, Caramel, Vanilla, Leather, Citrus, White Chocolate, & White Pepper

Palate: Dark Chocolate, Burnt Wood, Vermouth, Cigar Box, Anise, & Caramel

Finish: Long Length, Pepper, Cinnamon, Leather, Dark Chocolate, & Acetone

Body: Medium

Bite: Very Strong

__________________________________

Summary: I am a huge fan of the standard Old Grand Dad 114 and bonded bottle, so I was quite happy to come across this whilst driving through Washington. Unlike the standard 114, this bottle has an age statement. Being a single barrel product, there will be some variation between bottles.

The nose has an unusual, but nice fruit profile that reminds me of cantaloupe. There are classic bourbon notes such as caramel, vanilla, and leather. There are creamy chocolate notes and some punchy pepper notes. Overall it’s an interesting but balanced profile.

The palate isn’t nearly as sweet as the standard 114, only a slight caramel note. Strong bitter chocolate and oak notes are a bit overpowering. There is a quite dry cigar box note, a bit too dry. There is an interesting herbal note that reminds me of vermouth.

The finish has too much acetone, quite disappointing. The punchiness of the pepper and hot cinnamon are too strong as well compared to the subtle caramel sweetness. Due to the unbalanced profile, the strong dark chocolate bitterness doesn’t fit in well

I was really surprised with my blind review results, I thought this would be an excellent bourbon but I was quite disappointed by the palate and finish. There is a lack of sweetness in both areas, and the spiciness, dryness, and bitterness were overpowering. The worst aspect of the tasting was the acetone in the finish. Perhaps I got the worst single barrel out of this release, but this whiskey should have never made the cut.

__________________________________

Rating: 

Nose (10%) - 7/10

Palate (50%) - 4/10

Finish (40%) - 3/10

3.9/10 Bad. Noticeable flaws.

Recommend: No

Rank: I created a compilation ranking list of whiskies I’ve purchased at a store or at a bar and done a formal tasting. All whiskey ranked on the list tasted neat and rested for 10-15 minutes.  Whiskey I ranked below and above Old Grand Dad are shown for reference.

266 out of 276 whiskies tasted.

52 Old Grand Dad 114

265 Leopold Brothers Rocky Mountain Blackberry Whiskey

267 Tattersall Straight Rye Whiskey

Ranking Link: 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/147h44fId0tZYmHsroGgjzcRK2xn6050P8m7mZqArGLw/edit?usp=sharing


r/bourbon • • 9h ago

Review #255 - Dream Spirits Wheated Single Barrel selected by St. Louis Juice Box

Post image
10 Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 23h ago

Saints Alley - The Herald Cigar Blend 2026 (Review and and a new member of the family)

Thumbnail
gallery
45 Upvotes

Hey bourbon family hope everyone has been well. Been hard to muster motivation to do reviews in ages but with picking this up and reminded of home I figured I’d share my brief thoughts on this bourbon. Side note, Sebastian has a sister Calypso so she will be featured as well moving forward. This is a collaboration between Ironroot and The Liquor Hound on YouTube. If you haven’t seen his channel he has an outstanding collection and knowledge of all spirits you should give him a follow. It features blends from 10-13 years from MGP, Kentucky and Ironroot’s own distillate. Then double finished in Armagnac, PX and Oloroso Sherry barrels. Coming in at ~$115 this seems pretty reasonable given the presentation and makeup of this bottle.

Nose: cherry, orange, tobacco, oak and buttered corn

Palate: tobacco, cherry, black pepper, dates and sweet oak

Finish: sweet oak, tobacco, raisin, and more cherry

Summary: This is a very pleasurable pour that is not hot in any way and is very dense on the palate. Very crushable. More sweet than anything on the palate but other notes keeps this from being overpowering. This is like mixing a bottle of Bookers and Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend is how I can describe it without the peanut nut. Worth the price? I’d say so. Is it worth paying secondary? I’d say probably worth $140 or so but everyone’s wallet varies. I give this a 8 on the u/t8ke scale.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review Comparison: Old Weller Antique 107 (2020 vs 2021 The Last Word Pick)

Thumbnail
gallery
49 Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review #61: Peerless 10 Year Henry Kraver Reserve Bourbon

Post image
103 Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 22h ago

Review: Bardstown Distillery Reserve x Mars

Post image
20 Upvotes

As always, I do my reviews live and it’s a review of my experience with this pour. It’s not meant to be aggregated.

This is such a great bottle. It’s a little quirky and it’s definitely not for everyone but as someone who loves single malts and bourbon, it’s a fun concept and maybe I’m just the kind of sucker for something like this.

I look forward to blinding it in the future. I grabbed a bottle at the distillery before they ran out and then saw that they were going for under MSRP on Unicorn so I grabbed two more.

What is it? A collab between Bardstown and Mars: A blend of Bardstown Kentucky bourbon and Mars Japanese single malts.

69% 10 Year Old Bardstown bourbon (74/18/0/8)

8% 16 year old Bardstown bourbon (75/13/0/12)

20% Komagatake 5 year old Single Malt

3% Tsunuki 5 year old single malt

ABV: 54.9%

Price paid: $99.99 or $109.99. I don’t remember exactly. I bought it at the distillery this Spring. As mentioned earlier these go for as low as $85 or $90 at auction. One of those weird anomalies. I guess most people d on t love it like I do.

The other cool thing is this was all aged in barrels together in Kentucky. There will be another version next year led by Mars and it’ll all be aged in barrels in Japan and it’ll be heavier on the single malt and lighter on the bourbon.

Nose: Chocolate up front. Like powdered chocolate for an instant cake almost. Vanilla. A hint of fruit. A nice bit of malted barley. There’s something of ice cream - vanilla / chocolate ice cream swirl.

Palate: There’s some hard candy up front. Not werthers original quote but something like that. It’s a quite buttery mouthfeel. Definite graham cracker. Some maybe raspberry or plum notes - maybe cherry. Definitely a fruit layer.

Finish: Cherry comes out more on the finish. It’s a nice long finish, really pleasant. Some toasted oak. More of those fruits that I can’t 100% place.

9.2/10

I’m a fucking sucker for this bottle. I’ve rated it anywhere from an 8.1-9.3, I guess depending on my mood. That’s absurd. I’m admittedly just so in love with the concept that it probably skews me high. But this is one of my favorite whiskies of 2026.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

REVIEW #231: Jackson Purchase Select Batch Full Proof

Thumbnail
gallery
33 Upvotes

Most distilleries present a lower-proof whiskey as their primary bottling, but not Jackson Purchase. The Select Batch Full Proof, at 117.8 Proof, is their flagship bottling. I respect that. The higher proof lets the Bourbon tell its full story. Also noteworthy that their other two bottlings are 108 & 100 Proof.

The nose is rich with dark cherries, spiced vanilla & cinnamon sticks, a bit of oak then in the center is an herbal/floral note coming across to me as fresh eucalyptus. The palate is viscous and oily, carrying sweet cherries along with cinnamon & vanilla. The eucalyptus is a bit more prominent with dry corn, sweet oak and a hint of cardamom. Cherries and dry vanilla spice linger on the finish with the proof finally showing up as pleasant cheek-filling sparkles, then slowly it continues to dry with light oak tannins and a little dusty corn.

I really enjoyed sipping on this. Ordinarily I’m not a big fan of herbal/eucalyptus notes, but they play so well with the cherries and vanilla spice that I couldn’t put this down. It drinks more like an 8-10 year rather than its modest 4-year age statement. Perhaps there are a number of older barrels in batch. Regardless, this is a superbly blended Bourbon and one I will be keeping on my shelf.

Age: 4yrs

Mashbill:
70% Corn
20% Rye
10% Malted Barley

Casks: New #4 Char American Oak Barrels

ABV: 58.9%

Price: $75

Bottle provided for review.

My Rating: 84

Tasting notes below. 👇🏼

🥃
NOSE: Rich, dark cherry, spiced vanilla, cinnamon sticks, spiced oak, eucalyptus, herbal, floral.
PALATE: Oily, viscous, sweet cherries, cinnamon spice, vanilla, eucalyptus, dry corn, sweet oak, cardamom (?).
FINISH: Lingering, cherry, dry vanilla spice, cheek filling sparkles, dry oak tannins, corn.

Guide to my personal ratings:
🤢 0-49 = Varying degrees of undrinkable.
🫤 50-59 = Drinkable, but meh.
😊 60-69 = Fair. Not my cup of tea.
😃 70-79 = Good. Some nice elements.
😋 80-89 = Great! Interesting and very enjoyable.
🤩 90-100 = Amazing! The perfect pour. (Rare)

Sip. Rate. Repeat.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review #20: Widow Jane Lucky 13

Post image
23 Upvotes

Age: 13 Years Age Stated

Proof: 93

Batch: #8

Bottle: #202

Year of Release: 2023

Price Paid: $119.99

Drank - Neat

Rested - 10min in Glencairn

Summary/Background:
This is a Blend of whiskies from Kentucky, Tennessee, and Indiana whiskies. Almost 100% Certainly to be from Heaven Hill, George Dickel, and MGP

As always - Unbiased, Unpaid, and Unprofessional.

Nose-
My first nosing of this glass yields some Cherry pie filling, warm caramel sauce, and some honey. Further nosing i am able to pick out some light vanilla custard, butterscotch hard candy, and sweet oak with a slight "limestone" mineral note underneath. Nothing offensive, but semi flat and running wild in the "sweet" vein of things.

Palate-
Right up front on the first sip there is a Fresh Strawberry note that is followed by cream cheese frosting and a light butterscotch hard candy working together in conjunction. Subsequent sips reveal underlying notes of sea salt dark chocolate, charred oak, and a slight "limestone" mineral note underneath lacing throughout. Really thats about it here. A little layered but still staying in that "dessert" realm to me profile wise.

Mouthfeel-
It is mildly oily. It coats nicely and hangs on but not overly viscous at all. Very much on par or very slightly above average i would say given the age and lower proof. Pretty much as one would expect.

Finish-
A short to medium length finish, lead by notes of strawberry, dusty butterscotch, and charred oak, with a hint of orange zest and the famous Dickel "flintstone" minerality peaking through underneath.

Overall- 73/100

Final thoughts -

A good pour. Nothing mind bending or groundbreaking. It is Lacking in a few areas for me personally - depth, viscosity, and finish mainly. The palate here shines above the rest for me, however the nose is pretty solid - if you like a sweeter nose. Nothing offensive here and for the price I am not mad at it (but also would not repurchase). Something unique, different, and not often seen with a "Tri-State" blend from more or less all "legacy" distilleries!

My Scale:
1-49: Drain Pour, absolute drain cleaner, donate to the sink.
50-59: average - standard, boring, but gets the job done.
60-69: solid - reliable, but nothing to write home about.
70-79: great whiskey, well above the average pour.
80-89: excellent whiskey, top notch, well done.
90-95: exceptional top tier whiskey - very memorable.
96-98: Unreal pour - some of the best ever.
99-100: Pinnacle Lifetime whiskey - perfection in a glass.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review #15: Rock Hill Farms

Post image
113 Upvotes

Distillery: Buffalo Trace

Proof: 100

Age Statement: NAS

Mashbill: Undisclosed

Price Paid: $81.99

Availability: Allocated

Nose: Powdered donuts and confectionery sugar up front followed by some rye spice, and cinnamon. A hint of baked apples and some charred oak. The nose is excellent and very sweet.

Palate: Lots of confectionery sugar followed by baking spices such as allspice, ginger, cinnamon, and clove. It’s reminiscent of a good spice cookie at Christmas.

Finish: Medium with notes of powdered sugar, vanilla, and baking spices.

Mouthfeel: It’s got a good mouthfeel that is typical for this proof.

Score: 8.1

Final Thoughts: This bottle is quite confusing as there isn’t much information available on it. It doesn’t have a product section on the Buffalo Trace website and like a lot of BT products it’s NAS with an undisclosed mashbill. Additionally, it’s a single barrel without any barrel or Rickhouse information. I genuinely couldn’t even find what the actual MSRP of this is supposed to be because it varies even in control states. That being said, the whiskey in the bottle is really excellent. This is undoubtedly one of my favorite non BTAC products I’ve had the pleasure of trying from Buffalo Trace. It’s very approachable and has lots of sweetness that is balanced out by some of those baking spices. I wouldn’t pay the insane markup I usually see these for but it’s really good whiskey.

The t8ke Scoring Scale:

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn't consume by choice

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but many things l'd rather have

5 | Good | Good, just fine

6 | Very Good | A cut above

7 | Great | Well above average

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect


r/bourbon • • 21h ago

What are some *genuinely* BTAC-level bottles available now without a BTAC-level price?

0 Upvotes

And I don't just mean like "better value", we all know JD SBBP or ECBP or whatever is 80% as good for a fraction of the price. That's a done and tired conversation. I've yet to get a bottle recommendation from those kinds of threads that are actually a 9+/10 without having the 400+ dollar price-tag (closest being this year's RR13). Vintage bottles also don't count if their auction prices are BTAC level now.

I mean like, genuinely, the bottles that have been put blind against a decent release of GTS or WLW or RR15 or HH17 or JD14 B1 and held their own.

Edit: To emphasize the point further since a lot of people are recommending bottles that are, eg, almost as good as Handy, I’m talking about ones that are truly interchangeable with a good release of a good GTS or equivalent, like it would have a 40%+ win rate in a blind.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review #29: The Reveries Witness Mark

Thumbnail
gallery
25 Upvotes

Edit: Changed the score to be more realistic. 9.1 -> 8.8

First off I would like to say im happy the NBA season is back. As a huge OKC fan for years im celebrating this review for their win yesterday.

A quick note about this release. It was a site exclusive release. It is part of T8KEs new DREAD series. This was a very limited release of a private reserve barrel stock of his. When I purchased this there was a claim that there is only 68 bottles produced. There was more information on the site I was going to try to include here but the site shop is locked now.

*Rested 15 minutes

#Stats

Distillery: Kentucky ( T8KEs Reserve Barrel)

Mashbill & Age: Cask #27982. Unknown single barrel release mashbill. 9 years old.

Proof: 127.2 Proof (63.6%)

Cost: 99$

#Tasting Notes-

Nose: Not very pungent. Rich oak, Flat decarbonated cola, toffee, hints of black cherry, and peppercorn.

Palate: This drinks like its 100 Proof... Off the bat you get this BOLD viscous mouthfeel from it. It has a heavy cream initial touch on the tongue where a sweet and sour (like licking a penny) oak flavor shows up on the initial palate. A dark chocolate note quickly comes out and gets stronger the more you notice it. The palate description on the site for this bottle included black forest cake and it really is that damn flavor on the mid-palate. The spongy dark chocolate cake notes bring out a sweet cherry syrup flavor with it. I genuienly think the sweetness is reminiscent of drinking luxardo cherry syrup. Sweet oak shows up again and fights the cherry note for dominance until they balance each other out. A toffee note on the end palate also brings out some light barrel spice. Its oily enough that im confusing it with the finish sometimes.

Finish: This is easily the weakest part of this experience. I wouldve said the nose was but this drop off to me is quick. Its a short-medium finish. I get sweet oak and store brand whipped cream. Very similar feel to how the whip cream flavor disappears after eating. Theres a hint of oak in the after taste but I have to search for it to show up. If you take a big sip and let it hit the back of your tongue before swallowing though you can end up having a cinnamon sugar note show up a bit.

Conclusion: I dont know how this is a 99$ bottle. Its insane how good that palate is. Im not hyping this. I came in with low expectations and im blown away. My best comparison against this on the palate is RR13 45th and im HEAVILY leaning towards this. This is a top 5 bottle I own easily just for the palate. It shows up bold, viscous, and crushable, then it leaves like it was never there. When you go back for more it replicates the experience perfectly regardless of how long I let it sit. Over 1 hour now and nothing changed. This wouldve rated higher if it wasnt for the muted nose and short finish. Though I do consider the palate 70-75% of how I score bourbon.

Score: 8.8

Would I Buy Again?: Im committed to finding 1 more as a back up. 68 bottles but I would not regret paying more than 150$ for this.

T8ke Scale

-1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.  

(NEBC 9 Yr (1.5)),

-2 | Poor | I wouldn't consume by choice.  

-3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.  

-4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists.  

-5 | Good | Good, just fine.  

-6 | Very Good | A cut above. 

(JD SBBP Rye (6.2)),

(Weller Full Proof (6.8)),

-7 | Great | Well above average.

(NEBC 7.5 Yr (7)),

(Old Forester 1920 (7.1)),

(Blantons Gold (7.2)),

(Jack Daniels SBBP Rye (7.4)),

(FR OESO (7.5)),

(Jack Daniels SBBF (7.5)),

( FR OBSF (7.8)),

(Bookers StoryTeller Batch (7.8)),

-8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

(JD SBBP Rye (8)), 

(Stagg Jr 25D (8.3)),

(Jack Daniels 12 Year B4 (8.4)),

(Found North GoldFinch (8.5)),

(Rare Character Batch 2 (8.6)),

(Old Louisville 8yr (8.6)),

(Dark Arts Tokaji 7.5yr (8.7)),

(Found North Snow Day (8.7)),

(Colonel E.H. Taylor SBBP (8.8)),

(The Reveries Witness Mark (8.8)),

(Little Book The Infinite 2 (8.9))

-9 | Incredible | An all time favorite.

(Found North B12 (9)),

(Found North Batch 009 (9.1)),

(Found North T8KE Eleventh Hour (9.2)),

(Found North Batch 008 (9.3)),

(Knobb Creek 21yr (9)),

(JM Cigar Blend Batch 414(9.5)),

-10 | Perfect | Perfect.


r/bourbon • • 2d ago

REVIEW - Isaac Bowman Port Barrel Finished Straight Bourbon

Thumbnail
gallery
36 Upvotes

Bottled at 92 proof (46% ABV) & rumored to be using Buffalo Trace’s distillate, which is then aged in new charred American White Oak barrels before being finished for an unspecified amount of time in port wine casks, the bourbon under review is a multi-award winner and very fruit/port wine forward in both its aromas and flavors.

Bowman Port Barrel Finished is produced in small batches using an unspecified mash bill, a hybrid copper pot still.  The port wine barrels used for finishing are sourced from both Virginia wineries (American White Oak) as well as French Limousin Oak from Portugal.

ON THE NOSE: Dark fruits (plums, cherries, red berries) & raisins, stewed fruit compote/jam, chocolate, caramel, light vanilla, baking spices (cinnamon, nutmeg, light cloves), nuttiness, & honeyed black tea.

ON THE PALATE: Jammy dark fruit & raisin sweetness mixed w/punchy black pepper & oak tannins, unsweetened black tea, the baking spices from the nose, some caramel & vanilla, & unsweetened dark chocolate & fruit skin tannins on the finish.

MOUTHFEEL: Medium-short across the palate & medium-long in the glass

FINISH: 5-6 seconds


r/bourbon • • 2d ago

Review #254 - Willett Family Estate 10 Year Rye “Into the Woods” Jack Rose Single Barrel

Thumbnail
gallery
93 Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 2d ago

Review #184: Weller Full Proof - 29 Package Pick (2026)

Post image
89 Upvotes

Today we're taking a look at this Weller Full Proof that was picked earlier this year by 29 Package! The Atlanta area has had a few runs this year of shops doing Weller Full Proof and 107 picks with many of them being at decent prices and not the 250+ price gouging like we used to consistently see over the past few years. No complaints here. Full Proof has typically been my favorite of the Weller bunch, so I'm excited to sit down and formally review this one!

Taken: Neat in a Glencairn, rested for 10 minutes.

Age: NAS on label, but emailed Sazerac and was told 7 years, 2 months

Proof: 114

Nose: Yup, smells like a Weller. Sweet vanilla, strawberries, and brown sugar. Giving the glass a swirl enhances that strawberry note with some added caramel, cinnamon, and oak hanging around. I've already been a big fan of the aromas on Weller bottles and this one is no exception. Good stuff.

Palate: Good, oily viscosity where that strawberry from the nose comes across more like a black cherry now. Black cherries, brown sugar, caramel, and oak at first with some cinnamon starting to shine after subsequent sips.

Finish: Longer side of medium finish of brown sugar, cinnamon, cherries, and oak.

Not quite the best Weller Full Proof pick I've had, but pretty close. If you've ever had one of these before, you know what you're getting yourself into with this pick. This one isn't quite as bright on the palate like other Weller picks I've had, but that black cherry note is really nice. I think these are a great addition to anyone's selection if you're lucky enough to live in an area that isn't price gouging on these anymore, but if not, grab yourself a Maker's Cask Strength instead.

t8ke scale: 7.7/10 | Great | Well above average.

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists.

5 | Good | Good, just fine.

6 | Very Good | A cut above.

7 | Great | Well above average.

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite.

10 | Perfect | Perfect.


r/bourbon • • 1d ago

Review #161: Maker's Mark 101

Post image
13 Upvotes

Maker's Mark 101

Distillery: Maker's Mark

Age: NAS

Price: $37.99

Proof: 101

Nose: Relatively in line with what you'd expect from a Maker's nose. Cherry. Caramel. Vanilla. However it's a bit more baking spice heavy than I anticipated and there's a clove note that just doesn't sit right with me. It comes off as a little rubbery and clashes with the rest of the nose.

Palate: Thinner mouthfeel for sure. Wish there was more to it. Vanilla. Light oak. Getting this ground coffee thing that I really like and it's not something I've ever come across in a Maker's product. Well balanced.

Finish: Short to medium length. Less than expected for 101 proof but in line with your typical wheater that's not going to linger forever. Cinnamon. Green apple. Caramel. Toffee. Butterscotch. It's perfectly fine.

Score: 5.2

Summary: I hadn't seen Maker's 101 on a shelf near me in several years so I jumped at this bottle I came across a couple months ago. It's fine, but it left more to be desired. The nose really threw me off and every time I revisited the pour I came across that rubbery clove note. Just couldn't shake it. The mouthfeel was thinner than I'd like but overall the sip was nice. Some sweetness, some oak, some fruitiness, some spice, and a touch of earthiness. Can't hate on it too much, I just don't know where this fits in when regular Maker's Mark is on every shelf in the universe and for a few dollars more you get a vastly superior cask strength product. 5.2 is the score.

  1. Terrible | Drain pour after the first sip
  2. Very Bad | Trying to choke it down but possible drain pour
  3. Poor | Would drink if forced to but never under my own will
  4. Below Average | Not off-putting but not my cup of tea
  5. Average | I'll take it
  6. Good | Enjoyable sip
  7. Very Good | Well above average
  8. Excellent | A drink I will remember
  9. Incredible | Something truly extraordinary
  10. Best of the best | Peak Bourbon

r/bourbon • • 2d ago

Review #67: Red Top Kentucky Straight Rye Whiskey (Old Commonwealth; Aged 7 Years)

Post image
37 Upvotes

The review for this bottle is in the comments below...


r/bourbon • • 2d ago

Review #105 - Woodinville Whiskey Single Barrel Select Straight Bourbon

Post image
7 Upvotes

r/bourbon • • 3d ago

How Is This $45? J.W. Kelly Silver Springs Sweet Rye SB at 123 Proof [ Review #5 ]

Post image
116 Upvotes

INTRODUCTION:

This whiskey really got me thinking! I don’t post to this Reddit often, this is only my Fifth review here because for the most part I’m able to read other great post from both experienced professionals and professional alcoholics and they perfectly articulate everything that’s needed to be said. However, I like a fruitful discussion and seeing how J.W Kelly Silver Springs Single Barrels are fairly new and getting older… I decided to write about how this bottle utterly exposes the flaws with extorted consumerism surrounding the modern age of bourbon.
Whiskey has gotten f***ing expensive!
And I’m not just talking about the secondary market. Over the last several years we’ve watched major distilleries increasingly push the premium whiskey ceiling up into the $150, $300, and even $500+ range. Age statements have become luxury features, barrel-proof releases command premiums, and LE’s increasingly arrive wrapped in elaborate packaging and marketing campaigns telling us why the liquid inside is special. After you taste Silver Springs whiskey it’s abundantly clear why they have been gaining popularity. The SB’s are highly recommended throughout this Reddit with just about every bourbon-tuber raving about them as well.
That’s really the purpose of this review.
Not just to analyze Silver Springs, but to talk about its value along side the current state of American whiskey. So I’d truly like to hear from everybody if they have a 2026 123proof and if you agree/disagree with my conclusion.

As for my background, I’m a certified level 2 Sommolier with the CMS & WSET Level 3 Certified. Also, I was involved with the team who selected knob creek & Weller Antique 107 barrel picks, back in 2016-2018 with the company I worked for at the time.

______________________________________

J.W Kelly Silver Springs Single Barrel Rye:

Age: 8 to 9 Years old (Distilled 2017 - Bottled 2026)

Proof: 123

Single Barrel: 7714

Mashbill

• 65rye/15corn/20mb

(J.W. Kelly describes Silver Springs as being matured in #3 charred oak and bottled at cask strength. This is also a Sweet mash rye, meaning every distillation cycle they use freshly fermented grains with no back-set.)

Historical significance

The J.W. Kelly story is an interesting one of two different companies separated by time. The orginal Chattanooga Whiskey house and the modern revived brand. James Watt Kelly was originally in the wine trade but moved to Nashville in 1864 after hearing about the whiskey business. In 1866, he settled in Chattanooga and established what became J.W. Kelly & Co., including the Deep Spring Distillery. Deep Spring was the operating Tennessee distillery and historically carried registry “No.7”, not to be confused with Jack Daniels. Fun fact,
It’s just how the federal registration system worked as Tennessee was divided into internal revenue districts and Deep Springs Distillery sat at “No. 7” in specifically district two. Importantly Deep Spring produced more than ten labels, many named after Tennessee places and history. One of those labels was Silver Spring, produced from approximately 1900–1919. To continue, James Kelly was a significant business man in Chattanooga, besides whiskey he was known for Tobacco and real estate. In 1892 he was named among the “One Hundred Men Who Have Done Much for Chattanooga”. Unfortunately in 1907 he passed away where the business continued under Carl White, but the 1909 Tennessee prohibition hit the Distillery hard. Because of this the company split its whiskey and tobacco interests, and production eventually shifted out of Tennessee. In 1911, Carl White acquired a half-interest in the Kentucky Peerless Distilling Plant. By the later 1910s, J.W. Kelly & Co. had shifted whiskey production to Henderson, Kentucky, while the Chattanooga business sold non-alcoholic beverages ( interesting how J.W Kelly always had Kentucky connections even back in the early 1900s). When national Prohibition arrived in 1919, the whiskey company sadly ceased operations.
Deep Spring itself was demolished in 1927 effectively ending the whiskey business.

Fast forward into the future, Keeper’s Quest began researching/reviving the J.W. Kelly name around 2016 and officially relaunched the brand in 2017. The modern company revived the name as Silver Springs, adding the “s” and reimagining it as a sweet rye. (From shut down caused by prohibition in 1919 to the brands revival in 2017 was 98 years… nearly a century!)
So now the modern J.W. Kelly & Co. is part of Keeper’s Quest Brands in Chattanooga. This particular whiskey, however, isn’t distilled there. All bottles explicitly state “Distilled in KY,” while Keeper’s Quest in Chattanooga is identified as the bottler. This makes J.W Kelly an independent bottler, not some Deep Spring revival since it’s not a Distilling operation, just simply a resurrected brand. As most people know J.W Kelly Silver Springs is Sourced/Contract-Distilled and then aged, blended, and bottled in Chattanooga under the J.W Kelly label. With that established this brings us to the next question… Where the heck is the Distillate coming from ? Well thanks to the “Bourbon Culture” article written a few years ago by Mike F. & Mike B. We now have a pretty solid investigation leading to New Riff, in Newport, Kentucky contract distilling this unique Silver Springs Rye mashbill for J.W Kelly. The article specifically notes that old Rabbit Hole barrels carried New Riff’s DSP-KY-20016, confirming New Riff’s role as a contract producer for other brands during that period. In the initial article Bourbon Culture considered Brown-Forman, New Riff, Bardstown, and Rabbit hole as the most likely distilleries but couldn’t soundly find any evidence pointing to one or the other. Then in a 2024 update, the authors said they learned that Penelope had been using 65/15/20 rye distilled at New Riff, which they considered enough to resolve the likely provenance of the Silver Springs barrels.

Ok Let’s Get Into It

Nose:
It’s immediately apparent this isn’t a typical rye at all…. You get hit with lots of aged Leather, chocolate, and warm Brown Sugar Cinnamon syrup. Next the barrel aging hits you with some deep vanilla tones and underneath all that…. You find the rye with some cooked Cinnamon Apples, clove (Baking Spices), and rich Carmel. The nose hits you in exactly those three waves or layers of aromas. It’s clearly deep, rich, and complex really giving you something to think about. I’ve never had anything quite like this for a rye whiskey. On the next day a big vanilla cherry coke / black raspberry syrup / sarsaparilla note started to jump out and it’s fantastic! I also think this is the most leather I’ve ever smelled in a modern whiskey.

Palate:
Wow…. This is so unique and full of flavor. The initial attack needs time to build on the mid-palate where some Leather Rye and baking spices slowly transform into Rich brown butter, carmel, and brown sugar. The mouthfeel starts to build and becomes a nice medium bodied experience. The cooked cinnamon apple note is there and then explodes into the layered finish. Baked cinnamon apples and brown sugar galore are wrapped in warming baking spices as they build. Then something amazing happens…. that all transforms into a Mocha coffee/chocolate finish which is just special. This holds 123 proof well and is a layered, complex experience from nose to finish. My particular Single Barrel had a fantastically long finish which really pushed my rating up. ( I have a 118proof that’s excellent but nowhere close to how dark and rich this 123 proof is…)

______________________________________

Overall:

Silver Springs SB 123proof (90/100 or 9 T8ke)

( I don’t particularly like the T8ke rating system as I think it lacks nuance but I’m going to start rating for both whenever I do a post to appease anyone reading )

J.W. Kelly Silver Springs Sweet Rye SB 123proof Final Thoughts:

That 20% malted barley immediately separates this from the ubiquitous 95/5 rye recipe we’ve seen from MGP for decades. The corn pulls the whiskey toward sweetness while the unusually large malt component appears to give this a completely different personality.
Seriously. This bottle left an impression on me because Silver Springs represents everything I miss about whiskey now…. Even bourbon hunting. Nobody had to tell me this was special, allocated, or convince me it was a unicorn so I should wait in a line at the crack of dawn. I bought a lesser known bottle because the mash looked interesting, the price was right, and I discovered something fantastic. That is exactly what hunting whiskey used to be about.

This bottle has fundamentally made me question what we’re paying for in modern American whiskey… Why are we paying $100, $150, $200 and sometimes $300 for subpar 8–10-year rye when something like this exists? And I’m not making that comparison hypothetically. I own a 9 year Willett Family Estate rye that cost me well over $200 and I prefer this!!? Now, I’m aware that’s obviously my palate and my particular SB, but that’s precisely the point. The price printed on a whiskey bottle doesn’t magically create quality.
I recently did a review on Michter’s 10 Year Rye which has now reached a $210 suggested retail price for the 2025 release and that’s only a 92.8proof single barrel with roughly one more year of age than Silver Springs. Woodford’s current Barrel Strength Rye is $129.99 at 125.1 proof**.** Meanwhile, older Willett Family Estate SB ryes have occupied LE pricing territory!

Then here’s Silver Springs….No elaborate presentation box, prestige bottle, or giant marketing campaign convincing me I’ve been given the privilege of purchasing it.
Just a fairly plain bottle containing a Kentucky distilled, cask-strength, SB rye that cost me $45 bucks. And the whiskey is F***king excellent. It’s genuinely refreshing.
That being said I don’t think every expensive whiskey is a ripoff because aging costs money. Barrel tax and Inventory costs money. Evaporation costs money. Long maturation ties up capital for years. Single barrel selection has its own financial hurdles, and small production runs from craft distilleries don’t have the efficiencies of enormous brands.
So sure, there are legitimate reasons one whiskey costs more than another. But Silver Springs demonstrates something important… Price and quality have become increasingly disconnected at the premium end of American whiskey!

We’re increasingly asked to pay for scarcity, brand prestige, collectibility, packaging and the story surrounding the whiskey in addition to the liquid itself.
Sometimes the story becomes more important than what’s actually in the bottle.
That’s where I think the industry has starting losing me and many others.
A great example for me personally was the recent Kentucky Boy release honoring Chris Morris. Kentucky Boy was released as a one-time $100 tribute to Morris’s 50-year career, incorporating whiskey associated with Woodford Reserve, Old Forester Birthday Bourbon and King of Kentucky.
For me, the liquid didn’t remotely live up to what that story represented. And that’s what bothered me.
Chris Morris isn’t just some marketing figure attached to Woodford Reserve. He’s a Kentucky Bourbon Hall of Famer who began at Brown-Forman in 1976, helped create Woodford Reserve, succeeded Lincoln Henderson as Master Distiller, and was responsible for some of the most important bourbons ever created including Woodford Double Oaked, Birthday Bourbon, and King of Kentucky.
This wasn’t just another limited release. You’re putting the name and legacy of one of the most important people in modern Brown-Forman whiskey history behind it.
So, If you’re going to tell me this bottle represents Chris Morris, then I want the whiskey to make that argument when I taste it. I personally didn’t think it did along with many others.
That’s obviously a subjective assessment, it’s not that the company was intending to mislead anyone but it’s representative of a broader frustration I have with where whiskey has been going.
Sell me the whiskey! Not the FOMO.
Not the lottery and story about how privileged I should feel to buy it.
It’s really easy… just put something great in the bottle and charge me a price that makes sense for what’s actually there.

______________________________________

These bourbons were observed and tasted over a period of 3 hours. No, they were not blind. All notes were taken individually as tasted, and I used, what I consider to be my best glasses. They are always the same to guarantee consistency.