r/WrexhamAFC • u/UrsineCanine • 22h ago
Dirty rumors stain the Lilywhites - PNE home
No, I am not accusing PNE of starting the Gerrard to Wrexham rumors, but this was another example of a "Parky must win" over the years.
Having lived through a week of the Parky OUT crew assuming his demise and talking about who should be replacing him, I have a real burning desire to "spike the ball" to use an NFL metaphor, but no need.
It is absolutely a fair point that Preston is not a good team, and they are in bad form on top of that - though Preston got two key injured players back today. Sure, for the Parky OUT diehards there was nothing about this match that would change their opinion. However, the pre-match scenarios were things like: after this match R&R were going to be forced to take action before they end up in League One.
Don't worry. I checked some of their socials. They have moved the goalposts again. Now, he has to beat Blackburn and Blades and draw Boro and Wolves, or R&R will make the change in the November window.
But to be fair to them, if I can use the we go again mantra, so can they.
In fairness, a good number of the Parky OUT crowd consider it regrettably necessary, not desirable, and have been happy to see Parky prove them wrong across the years and would be happily wrong again.
What I don't understand is those who suggest Wrexham were lucky and it could have easily been 4-4. Wrexham outshot them 18/11, On Target 6/1, xG 1.67/0.87, xGOT 3.08/0.56, Shots inside the box 13/6. I get there is value in the eye test, but it has limitations too. Nor am I immune to those limitations.
Up Next
Next Saturday, they head to Blackburn. Parky said in the pre-match presser that on Monday they were going to do an evaluation to find out which of the players on the grass this week (all but Libby) would be back.
Parky
When the lineup dropped, I was reminded of our discussions after the Derby game about going with the 3412 from the start, as it had been successful there. I liked the idea, but wondered whether Parky would be willing to step away from his general principle of having a threat on the bench to throw in as needed.

We have covered the 3412 shape before, and its core idea - pinning the CBs to give COH the space in behind them. You have heard me say that I like it because it forces backlines to choose whether to go with Kieffer dropping in and leave Smith 1v1. It gives a nice set of triangles with the holding midfielders to do things like this:

Since we have largely seen this as a "chasing a goal" shape, I wondered how this would transition into their low block shape. Would COH drop in between the holding midfielders into a 532? The is answer was no.

The 541 was wide and compact, but it gave time for CBs and holding mids to organize and pick out passes in behind. Holding this shape as a block provides more defenders (or rest attackers, if you prefer) on their CBs and holding mids to force quick decisions, and keep an eye on the counter attack.
As you can see, this can cause some stress on the outside of the back line - look at those three PNE players in a lot of space to run at them. Tuesday's goal not withstanding, I trust Ekomie and Doyle with the task, but I do think it stretches Imray's defensive skill a bit on the other side.
Parky praised "the secure platform" of James and Whiteman and you really need that midfield triangle to make sure they can't switch the ball through middle. You also need efforts like this to close down the backline trying to feed it up the channels.

Overall, on the ball, I really like giving COH all the pockets to slide around and put balls in behind. Like this (look at Whiteman with the progressive header to feed him).

So, that is the answer to "Why not do this all the time?" There are those tradeoffs defensively, and of course, squad depth. I would like to see more of Cadz, but he isn't in front of Windass or Broady in terms of attacking talent. I really would like to see COH and Broady on the pitch together.
The real key here is that Smith is a better attacking talent than Ollie or LOB, so this is that calculation made with the current state of the squad.
Having said that, they have played this shape with Josh before - at home against Coventry in the Halloween game. Ultimately, their system design is to shift around the three players up top, so when Windass is available, they can shuffle on the fly to it.
Another trade off is that while we like Smith making progressive passes like this, it just isn't his game to get that ball to Cadz up the channel, or even put Ollie in with all of that space.

This is not in any way a criticism of Smith, just a contrast in the skill profiles. I also suppose Kieffer's comfort passing the ball caused a couple of dangerous opposing chances and their goal.
The subs weren't controversial for me. Kabore is a better defender, and his pace causes problems.
Seeing them stick with 3412 with Ollie for COH and Cadz for Moore was nice. Likely shows they are more broadly training it across the squad, and not just for the starting trio.
Dobson on for James makes sense as I expect James is on a minutes restriction. They had a three goal lead, and notwithstanding some clear evidence this season, he is not a poor defender - he gets caught in transition.
They did switch back to 3421 when LOB came on for Smith. I like that it enabled Cadz to get minutes in both roles.
I am amused that after hearing all week that the summer window was "disaster" and that Whiteman and Worrall were failed signings, those two both have outstanding games.
Players
Whiteman
He got dog's abuse from the away fans all game. Fair enough, but they also said he was a horrible player and they were glad to be rid of him. Why not cheer his departure? :) Of course, he was 95th percentile in progressive passing in the Championship, so his absence likely has a lot to do with their record signing Alfie Devine having gotten his first goal involvement yesterday.
You saw the earlier header pass to COH, but I like that he gets balls up the channel on a quick touch, like this example:

We were talking last week (after Dobbo's underwhelming shot) about why we don't get goals from our holding midfielders, and on cue, Ben delivers one.

I like that he doesn't complicate it. Just a one touch pass through a gap in the back line and into the goal. And then he blows kisses to the away fans... And there were suggestions that this crew lacks an edge... :)
Worrall
We talked about him being a set piece weapon last week, and sure enough, he gets one this week. Last season, Wrexham were actually statistically pretty good on set pieces, but I felt they were getting a fair number of open headers that were going to waste. Between Whiteman's service and Worrall's heading, I think we might be underselling that aspect of the summer recruitment.

I also think we shouldn't undersell his defending either. If he isn't alert here, I worry about how the crowd gets...

Doyle
I think Doyle was holding back a bit and they were not sending him forward as much. He was still good defensively, and that set piece service for Moore's goal was really nice. We now know why Worrall was congratulating Doyle - he didn't get a touch, and thought it went straight in. But again, I will never miss watching Doyle do things like this:

Hyam
I think he is better in the middle of the back line, but he has a good distribution from distance, and even took a free kick set piece yesterday. I kind like the idea of being able to use him and Worrall as the back line and push Doyle up into a 2-3-5 attacking shape. There are those who swear by it being the more secure rest defense than the 3-2-5 (though not sure I agree). What I don't really think suits Dom is these sorts of passing scrums:

Ekomie
Another solid shift from him. His defending remains outstanding, and while I think he had a relatively quiet game flying up the left side, I liked seeing this... He uses his pace to create space and then delivers this perfect pass to create a chance for COH.

Say what you will about PNE being poor, but this is well worked, and a lot of clubs don't get that block in on COH's shot.
Imray
Glad to see Imray back in the starting XI. I can't tell whether Wrexham was overloading the left side on purpose to leave him in space, or whether it was just the effect of how the play progressed with the shape, because it wasn't like I saw Windass being pulled over to the left or anything. However, this play reminds you that you can put him in the half-space like a CAM.

Of course, I liked his long throws also, even if it was his cross in the second phase that got the Worrall goal. Worrall is not up there if we are not taking a long throw.
Kabore
Pretty typical Kabore shift. He is a more instinctive defender in the backline than Imray. I think Imray has a broader attacking tool box, but Issa is better at what Issa does, which is this:

Patto
Can't expect him to save that goal. And it was the one shot on target he faced. Of course, you saw him earlier bail out Doyle's OG try. I like that he gets out to claim balls, and he makes quick and effective throws to get the ball up the pitch. He had six completed throws, the shortest was 18 yards - so it isn't just setting the ball at the nearest CBs feet.
James
Who doesn't love Matty James, and hope his back doesn't act up again? Given the similarity between his game and Whiteman's, I still chuckle when I hear the exact same critiques thrown at Ben that were levelled at Matty back in L1. Even Whiteman's goal was eerily reminiscent of Matty's first for Wrexham at Crawley (not that worldie at Derby last season). I will also never get sick of these sorts of "old guy at the pick up game" plays from him:

COH
I mean the data told us he isn't a great finisher, but I mean, come on. He is just getting done dirty by Lady Luck right now. Regardless, his passing, his movement, his dribbling, etc. - his overall threat, just makes this club better, and he is a nailed on starter and making a run at POTS.

Smith
Glad to see him finally get his first of the season. He has been overdue. He came to Wrexham having never played in a two-striker system, and I think he has shown now that he can do it well - and not just when chasing a lead and there is no work on the defensive end of the pitch. I actually thought he was the better of the two strikers today.
Moore
A couple of dangerous soft passes with one ending up in the back of Wrexham's net. Though in fairness, there is a difference in passing with someone in contact with you. I do think he also tried to turn rather than laying off the first one, turned it over, which was a warning. So then, he completely under hit the "safe" pass to the back line, which led to their goal. Let's hope it wasn't because he felt he needed to be Josh Windass with two strikers playing.
All of my caveats from last week apply, but Moore is now on pace for over 20 goals. So far, I think the decision to leave the striker succession plan (with its SCR budget) to Nickson has worked out.

Cadz
It was good to see him get some minutes. You can see his raw athleticism and talent, but this play feels like one of Mo Faal's cameos, when he came on and tried to do too much by making an amazing play, which then turned out badly.

Ollie
It never worked playing him in behind the striker in the 3-5-2, though did very well in its "high 8" position in L1. I think he may be well suited in that "in behind role" in the 3412 because he has the energy to chase side-to-side and he can tee up a shot.
Dobbo / LOB
The only interesting thing here is that Dobbo came on for James and LOB came on as a 10. Granted, there was a three goal lead and the 10 depth has been suffering, but it makes me suspect that LOB is dealing with a bit of a knock or the staff doesn't like him in the holding role. Might be a bit of both.
I will also allow that they wanted to see Ollie in the COH spot.
I chuckled on this play, "Oh, ref, we're not calling that? Fair enough, I got that in my bag too."








