I work as a 2nd in Dept for Maths for an 11-16 in the south of England.
TLDR at bottom
In our most recent Ofsted we scored as requires attention for T&L and attainment, although our maths results have always been good, if not outstanding (just above NAT AVG consistently).
In light of this, we have a brand new T&L handbook this year that must be followed. This handbook was created by the lone T&L Deputy with some consultation from the rest of SLT.
He, and only he, did a booklook this week into our dept.
My HOD attended a "10 minute talk" to discuss the results of the booklook. We were rated badly on "Presentation" and "Assessment". Through the discussion he realised that he had no idea how we assess.
In terms of presentation, we were rated badly because for ratio tables - effectively a quick cross or 2x2 grid in their book - pupils haven't used a pencil and that "it's in the handbook that we use pencil for diagrams". My HOD argued this and he said that we will have to change our practice, because he "designed that handbook over summer using chatgpt for the ideas and that that is what Ofsted will be comparing books to."
He then went on to say that "I used chat gpt to come up with some teaching ideas that you should implement for maths so you should be including spot the mistake questions or multiple choice questions."
I honestly have never felt more insulted as a working professional.
We have a school of lead practioners, HODs, ECTs and experienced professionals who have been dismissed entirely from this process and instead are using chat gpt to set policy.
I am absolutely fuming about this to the point that I am looking for other jobs in my area.
I obviously love my school however and want to meet with someone to discuss my concerns over this, however we aren't ever afforded the opportunity to meet with SLT. My HOD is brilliant but honestly I feel bad putting it all on her and part of my concerns is that staff concerns aren't being heard.
TLDR
On Monday I want to email the head and ask to speak with him where I will lay out my three main concerns - use of AI to set policy, lack of consultation with teachers and the disrespect of using AI to tell them how to do their jobs as well as the pointless additions to workload that we are being burdened with at the moment. I have ideas for what I would do alternately however know that it is probably not my place to discuss it - but then I'm second guessing that due possibly to how I haven't felt listened to for a while now.
I know that this may not be the best course of action, that I could rely on my HOD, try to talk with the T&L SLT or discuss with other teachers in other depts, but I can see good and bad sides of all these ideas.