I'm envious of screenwriting technique that favors the visual, especially as a procession of images, without resorting to literal camera direction. I don't have these chops myself. I tend to write everything that's going on in the scene and you, the reader, can put the camera wherever you want in your mind's eye.
The following passage is from NEAR DARK by Eric Red and Kathryn Bigelow. It's got mood, tension, character detail, and just enough modifiers and similes to enrich the imagery (voice). These lines appear on the page without space between, a method I usually attribute to Shane Black - abbreviated lines hugging the left side of the page and cascading down (in this case, the lines are not so abbreviated but the principle is the same).
Caleb twists a groggy face upward, lifting his lids.
To see the sharp bladed rowel of a shining silver spur stuck against his throat.
It is connected to a boot.
Attached to a steamshovel of a leg in black jeans.
Part ot the body of a strapping sinewy man with a mean, skullish face and eyes like dead meat.
SEVERN VAN SICKLE
My tendency with a moment like this would be: "Caleb awakens to the sensation of a silver spur on his throat." But I love the stylized cadences of this NEAR DARK passage especially because we're getting the visual information piecemeal as we go up a guy's leg without saying "TILT UP to reveal" or "WIDER ON" etc.
I'm curious how many of you aim for this one-image-after-another effect. Does this approach to rendering a scene in detailed images seem self-indulgent or accomplished?