Left: Catherine hosting the recent tea party with the participants from the Three Peaks Challenge, at Windsor Castle.

Right: Catherine going back to visit the Royal Marsden hospital returning there after her cancer treatment was completed.

Edited

Archived link here.

Quoted in part:

A 'friend' of Harry & Meghan told Alison Boshoff this:

"They can achieve great support for charities and intend to do so. There will be more days like going forward.

‘People want the old Harry, the Harry who they loved. This was a successful event with no narrative other than supporting the organisations.

For security reasons it had the shape of a royal event but that is because, ultimately, that is who they are."

Prince Harry is apparently ‘very pleased’ with how the day went and was involved in planning, right down to requesting his wife wear British designers to show her allegiance to the country they call home again.

"That was a royal visit even if it wasn’t,’ " says his pal. "They were delighted with the warm welcome. H is delighted."

And I can reveal that there will be more outings to come – news to make their enemies at the Palace shudder. Words like ‘humble’ are also being used. That’s what the pair were apparently hoping to convey – despite Meghan’s £3,386 outfit – with their meetings with grassroots charities.

As for the idea that they may be treading on royal toes, that notion is swiftly, if not entirely convincingly, debunked.

A friend of Harry and Meghan tells me: "They are making efforts to re-enter slowly with humility and hope to win support that way. There is no intention to thumb a nose at the King or cause irritation.

‘This sort of work is what makes Harry happy, it is in his DNA. It is nothing to do with relations with the Royal Family."

So it’s confirmed Nottingham police did provide 3 support officers, one unmarked police car and one traffic police car. They are using taxpayers money, they are cashing in on their charitable appearances and this will reflect badly on the King if he does nothing, because they will damage public support for the Monarchy in the long run.

Mason Cooley was a distinguished writer and university professor, born on June 25, 1927, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Throughout his life, Cooley became a prominent figure in the literary and academic spheres, known for his incisive style and sharp sense of humor. During his career as a university professor, Cooley taught at several prestigious institutions, including Columbia University and the University of Rochester.

MARKLE'S VERY SECRET BRITISH BID YOU MAY HAVE MISSED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc9pypW8e2E

I can’t—honestly, I can’t—take my eyes off that belt. Everything else is wrong, really wrong, but that belt...

I need Joan now!!!

"Oh, please! Look at Meghan. She looks like a chic, high-end barista who is about to charge me fourteen dollars for an oat milk latte and then judge my shoes!

I mean, look at that belt. Honey, the tail of your belt is longer than Harry's list of complaints! Is she trying to secure her waist or is she carrying a spare leash for the corgis?

And the color? It’s brown on brown on burgundy. She looks like a walking, talking Russell Stover chocolate sampler. I don’t know whether to curtsy or unwrap her and eat her with a glass of red wine!

This outfit is so stiff. She's pulled her hair back so tight that if she smiles any wider, her ears are going to meet in the back of her head! Can we talk?!"

Ahh, what a relief!!! 😌😌😌😌😌

Claw fancies herself a businesswoman. We know—she thinks she’s a businesswoman. And Sean has never been able to grasp why Bloomberg interviewed her, given that it’s obvious she has never truly been a businesswoman, having never actually run a business. She’s a second-rate actress who works for herself, and she got lucky by landing Harry—which is how she managed to get Oprah—whom she treats like a queen to whom she must pay homage—to attend her wedding.

One point before we begin: what Roland Mouret recounts in his memoirs, Sean said long ago, wasn't a problem specific to one designer. It happened to several, including Stella McCartney and Victoria Beckham.

Claw was convinced that those designers deserved to die for gifting them their most expensive garments.

No, a designer—like Dior—wants perpetual publicity, much like a king’s son arriving at a coronation.

Harry didn’t buy it; Dior lent it to him. Harry returned it. Dior doesn’t believe Claw would ever return anything.

OOOOHHHH!! Yes!!! Neil Sean in Dr. Evil mode 🥳🥳🥳🥳

Here’s Claw with his groomer. And the guy who photographed Claw managed to make her hair look perfect—it’s so shiny—and he just can’t stop looking at it. 😏😏Claw can never go anywhere without fanfare. The Park, just like the Claridge, has a private entrance. So, this image was a coincidence 😏😏

And her groomer’s getting tons of requests now, after this bit of publicity, right? Although Sean says that if he were a hairdresser, he’d have a better calling card 🤣🤣🤣

And Claw was wearing "affordable high-street clothing". Marks & Spencer

Claw was dying for the world to know that she was dressed in casual clothing.

Claw wants it to be seen that she is an ambassador for British fashion. And, behind the scenes, she is annoyed because Marks & Spencer hasn’t called her. Why haven’t they called her, when they did call Holly Willoughby?

Well, Sean knows someone at Marks & Spencer, and they’re looking into whether the item Claw used is actually seeing an increase in sales now. And that will determine whether or not that store calls Claw.

This isn’t Cartier, it isn’t Dior... but what’s left for Claw?

I think she also tried it there and failed 🤣🤣🤣

SPURNED IN CITY / FAKE LETTERS & INSIDE SECRETS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rcnmidzxQA

Sean finds this fascinating. And I have to say, I feel the same way.

How do the Harkles measure their success? Because, according to them, the Australian tour was a success. And now, the Nottingham trip was a success, too.

Sean said that a massive effort was made to attract people to that area; they tried everything.

Sean says that former employees from Montecito have told him that Harry is manageable—and that things will go smoothly—as long as he is viewed as a victim who is suffering, and as long as one is prepared to constantly listen to him complain about something. In other words, if an employee shared something sad, Harry would respond by sharing something even sadder that had happened to him.

Harry is not a positive person; he is a victim of trauma.

Alright, Nottingham. Yesterday, Sean mentioned that Claw received flowers, which his team then gave to the people who had come over.

Yes, that’s what happened. Other journalists who were there have already confirmed it.

And Sean had said on Wednesday that the Harkles had pulled out all the stops to attract their fans from the area.

How sad that this, too, turned out to be true.

I find it sad, because, how low can one sink?

Well, the mayor and any politician from Nottingham stayed well away from the area where the Harkles were.

Now, the Harkles want to spin this as a success at all costs.

But Claw’s hair doesn’t lie. Claw knows it wasn’t a success. And nothing has changed for her. She remains furious that KC3 has done nothing for them—or for her—to ensure she receives the treatment befitting a duchess.

Claw wants that photo with the King; she wants to be considered a senior royal. She wants to be treated as what she truly is: the most important royal of all.

KC3 didn’t take that meeting seriously at all—a meeting that, incidentally, was about Harry and the fact that he was spiraling once again. But KC3 realized that Harry intended to use it as a form of blackmail, so it ended up being nothing more than a pleasant 47-minute meeting.

The other problem that Claw hasn’t seen yet—but will soon—is that there *were* people there; there were people from non-traditional media outlets. And, as it turns out, they decided not to lie.

As someone on Twitter said: drones don’t lie too

There were traditional media outlets, but the fact is that everything was extremely poorly organized. That is why everything was chaotic.

Claw will see those images, but in her mind, she will recall that there were many people present. Consequently, she will make sure it appears as though a large crowd was there—something that serves to confirm her star power. To that end, she ensures that there are people who select the best photos and then retouch them.

Oooooookkkkkk! 🙄🙄🙄🙄

Because, when all is said and done, she managed to knock the King out of the headlines, thanks to her big comeback.

However, Sean mentions something at the end that contradicts what a supposed "friend" of the Harkles claimed—namely, that "Claw" was busy reading scripts and attending to her duties, and that she has no desire to take part in many events like the one in Nottingham. That’s not true; Sean says there are more such events in the works.

Claw and Harry ate at a very expensive restaurant—after all, they could afford it, since they hadn’t made any donations to any of those organizations.

According to what Sean was told, they did not make a donation because they did not want attention to be diverted from the organization’s work.

Oooooookkkkkk! 🙄🙄🙄🙄

BROKE THE RULES - MARKLE EXPLODES WITH H OVER THIS MISFIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoJJZdnot9c&t=6s

Claw is a narcissist. It’s no longer a matter of an inadequate diagnosis; the fact is, Claw is a narcissist.

As Juan Gabriel said, "What is plain to see need not be asked about."

Narcissists completely disconnect when anything other than themselves is discussed. Narcissists don't listen to anything but praise directed at them.

Claw is a very poor actress. This was evident in Nottingham; at the school they visited, Harry still managed to pretend he was paying attention—but Claw didn’t. Eventually, though, both of them tuned out. And it showed.

However, what was evident to the journalists present was that Harry was more comfortable than Claw. He was in his element—in a realm he knew well, and one to which he desperately wanted to return.

Claw, on the other hand, was furious.

Claw is furious because Harry doesn’t want to follow her rules. He wants to stay in the UK; he wants to do things his own way—but she doesn’t. So, Claw has done what she always does: she’s stolen the spotlight from Harry, positioning herself as the true star. People came to see *her*; her makeup and her outfit were more important than anything Harry was doing.

Furthermore, it seems the women were warned to keep their distance from Harry. Harry actually wanted to connect with people—but Claw did not. And she didn’t want him connecting with women—not out of jealousy, but because doing so would have stolen the headlines.

And it seems that Harry is realizing that.

THE KINGS HEALTH SCARE - IS IT TRULY THIS?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHSfHdX09Wg

Well, the recurring theme is the matter of the King’s health.

KC3 has spoken about his health issues and his age—about how he can no longer do certain things. This has made him very relatable to many people, who have realized that he truly understands what they themselves are feeling.

The King should have attended the Royal Ballet’s centenary anniversary, especially since its patron is Sarah Chatto.

Sarah attended that event, even though it was the King who had been expected to go.

This raised alarms regarding his health.

However, according to Sean’s source, it wasn’t a health issue. The King had—how should I put it?—as a moment of annoyance, triggered by something Charles Spencer said.

His former brother-in-law was shamelessly reopening some truly horrific old wounds. The allegation that King Charles III had a male lover might seem trivial today, but at the time, it was a scandal that haunted him for years. It was a terrible situation—all the more so because the person who had instigated it all, Diana, was no longer alive.

And I say "as a moment of annoyance" because Sean points out that the King was very concerned about arriving at an event, stepping out of his vehicle, and having a journalist ask him about what his former brother-in-law was saying. It wasn’t that KC3 wanted to respond, but rather that he didn’t want to overshadow the Royal Ballet’s centenary—especially since he knew it was likely to happen, given that it had happened to Harry.

The whole business with his brother-in-law unsettled KC3 a bit—because there it was again: that horrible slander.

So, apart from a cold, KC3 is in decent health. He’s just exhausted from a lot of things—the situation with his brother-in-law, his brother, and his second son.

That’s all the tea for today 😁

Recently, French designer, Roland Mouret, an old friend of Meghan's from her Canada days, released an excerpt of his upcoming memoir. In that, he narrates an incidence that led to his falling out with Meghan.

(There are multiple posts covering this topic in the last 24 hrs so, I wont repeat that here.)

This lead me down a rabbit hole, as I wanted to see all the dresses that Rm supposedly gave Meghan to wear, as a freebie.

Here's a comprehensive list, starting as far back as 2015. The year she wore that particular dress has been (crudely) written by my using the edit function on my image editor....

(I have taken these screenshots from google, and I have verified the dates and designer through multiple websites.)

The first instance I could find of her wearing RM is from 2015, pre-Harry. The trousers. Im guessing this is just after they became friends via Soho house.

1... 2015

2... 2016. From a party that RM hosted. Im guessing this would definitely have been a freebie, since thais was RM's own party.

3... 2018. The day before the wedding, while checking into the hotel with her mum. This dress created quite a stir and most articles were speculating whteher this is a tease that RM is the wedding dress designer. Se repeated this outfit later in Australia.

4... 2018, July. Ireland tour. The dress was the same as her navy, prewedding outfit, in a different colour. Its famously known as the bad bra dress.

5... 2018, April. At an Invictus Games reception at Australia House in London. The bag was RM.

6... Australia tour, 2018.

MM did not officially wear this particular dress in public, or any a RM design while on tour. However, a couple of sites about her fashion/clothes mentions a RM ivory dress as a possible "what you can wear instead" as alternative to the white, capped dress/gown she wore to a reception .

The most credible of these links is an Elle article that details her entire wardrobe from the tour with all her clothes, in order, by day and event, and possible alternative options you can wear. Link below :

https://www.elle.com/uk/fashion/celebrity-style/a23813894/meghan-markle-prince-harry-royal-tour-style-outfits/

IMO, this is clearly a merch article. I have been told by my stylist cousin that when they do placements such as this (suggesting another option) it ususally means that product is also being merched by the same link/person, and if its a celeb, then it's usually one amongst the possible options that the celeb was contracted to merch. But may not have worn for some reason. As per contract, they still have to merch the product. Thats why I think this RM dress may also have been part of the freebie RM sent.

7 ... November 2018. Mm wore this dress for a christmas dinner hosted by The Royal Foundation.

Note : It is sometime in November 2018, that Melissa Toubatti handed in her esignation. this is right after the Aus tour in Oct 2018. speculation is rife that this may have been about the incidence involving a price tag hanging from one of the red Self Portrait dresses that MM wore. Tom Bower mentions that Mel tried to dissuade meghan from talking and asking for freebies. Harry in spare said that Mel asked for freebies which was against the rule, so she was fired by them.

The latest except from RM's memoir says that RM 's staff contacted KP because they wanted the freebies lent to meghan back. Catherine got to know. She may have contacted Mel. this angered MM who then scolded RM for embarrassing her and broke off their friendship.

I think this may have been one of the reasons Mel was fired. Mm blamed her once Catherine got to know about the freebies.

8... Jan 2019. This is arguable the dress she wore on the night that she told Harry she was thinking of unaliving herself and their unborn baby. Crying Daniel was staying at their house with them and had posted about doing her makeup.

9... 2020, Meghan's last solo royal engagement, at National Theatre. back then no one knew she and RM had had a falling out. This engagement wasnt publicized much. Nothing about the official work she did on that at NT is known, just bnw pics released that looked like a photoshoot. many articles about the fashion though. Which suggests to me that she was merching had prearranged merch contracts and articles ready to go.

This is the last known instance of MM officially wearing Rm designs. looks like she did not buy or get any new products from him. However, she may have kept some of the older clothes he gave her. (i ahve screen shots below).

so, we move on to the "cheap, high street copy" of RM designs that MM now wore after Megxit, which RM saw and contected her about.

10 ... 2022. This was copy-Kate outfit. Its not a RM design that Mm is wearing, but Catherine's gown is a Rouland Mouret and she wore this at the Top Gun premier in London. This outfit was a sensation.

Mm clearly wore copycat design, some luxe high-street brand just a few weeks later. The cosplay was way too obvious. I think this may have been the dress that miffed Rouland and he texted MM that this was "ridiculous". She texted back that they should meet.

11... 2025. This is NOT a RM design but it's very similar to the skirt she wore in March 2020, so, i wonder if this is also a "cheap, high street copy" of Roland's design. but thast just mu=y opinion, no proof there.

12.. 2026. Mm wore this for some insta posts. She has previously worn this dress in Nov 2018 for the Royal Foundation dinner. So, she likely owns this dress. whther it was freebie or she actually paid for it is anyone's guess. personally, id say she never paid for it.

..

That's all folks. This is all the dresses I could find. If there are any I have missed, please post below.

I made this list because I was curious about all the dresses she has worn. And I assumed others may have been too.

From @nancytsidley on X.

So Rebecca was explaining Op notes, whereby the Royals tell the press where they will be that week, but never give timings for security reason.

The Harkles had their itinerary printed out in the local newspaper website the day before, with exact timings. I guess they had to make sure a few sugars would show up. So tiresome.

You'll be getting tired of hearing about, so last one about Nottingham, I promise

Full article here. I've just added a few snippets of interest from it

https://www.geo.tv/latest/686993-nottingham-crowd-get-strange-instruction-minutes-before-harry-meghan-arrive

....However, as the couple rejoice in their successful first outing, a royal correspondent revealed the ground reality of how the arrival had panned out with one odd detail sticking out.

There were journalists and social media reporters present at the venue capturing the moment, and HELLO!’s royal correspondent, Eleanor Dye, an unexpected instruction that was given out to the crowd by the charity hosting the Sussexes.

During a discussion between Royal Editor Emily Nash and Editorial Director Andrea Caamano, Emily noted that Harry and Meghan do have a “dedicated following” but that would not apply to every location in the UK.

She explained that Nottingham has a long-standing connection but the reaction felt like it had been set up. To that, Andrea detailed Eleanor’s account of the day’s events.

“Well yes, our Online Royal Correspondent Dye was there,” Andrea said.

“At the second engagement she did say to us that people from the charity, not related obviously to Harry and Megan, did come out before they arrived and told the crowds, ‘Make sure you cheer very loudly when they come out’ and ‘You can say, Meghan, I love you’, which I thought is strange.”

Emily said that she has “never really seen that happen” except for school children being told to behave, nor “just before a member of the royal family arrives”.

W.T.A.F?!

LOL at the MM's fascinated face.

Here is what they are up to next. Hazno pretending it was his money and donation again further down in the article (when it was from the Diana fund)

From Nottingham Live's Facebook page

A Nottingham recording studio that supports hundreds of young people has dropped a major hint about further backing from Prince Harry and Meghan.

The Community Recording Studio has been giving kids a safe space to hang out, make music, and play sport since 1991.

Right now, the charity is trying to pull together a £3 million funding envelope to transform its base at the former Russell Youth Club on Lowdham Street.

And that massive redevelopment plan could be getting a serious push from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The couple made a stop at the studio on Thursday as part of their visit to Nottingham.

For charity boss Trevor Rose, the visit meant a lot more than just a quick photo opportunity for the visitors.

He said: "They took time to see what the kids really need and they keep asking what more they can do to help and that's the most important thing."

During the afternoon, a 13-year-old girl got the chance to perform a song that she had written in front of the couple.

Prince Harry already has strong ties to the studio, having first visited back in 2013 in a private capacity.

His recent £1.1 million donation to BBC Children in Need is already helping to fund the charity's new creative spaces and sports hall.

But when asked if even more direct support was on the way from the couple, Trevor made it clear that things are moving fast.

He added: "I would love to tell you everything, what I can say is watch this space."

I’m not talking about laugh lines/wrinkles/normal aging. Theres a lot going on here. I’m going to venture lack of money and self care. Honestly I thought she was pretty before - not heart attack beautiful at all - but pretty. Now, the inside ugly is reflecting to the outside.

Here is what Dan and Paula have to say on the piping hot tea from Roland Mouret’s book, as well as some thoughts on prior allegations.

https://youtu.be/pm_iwBmNCQs

That One and Roland Mouret met “you guessed it, at SoHo House” when RM was providing wardrobe for Suits and That One was still with Cory.

Later, That One wanted to meet up with RM after she broke up with Cory. This was when Dan says she went to London “on her manhunt… chasing people like Max George from The Wanted and Matt Cardle former X-factor winner.” That One also said during the mockumentary this was her “single girl summer” but as Tom Bower reported, That One did not even break up with Cory until after the Todger bag was locked down.

That One breathlessly told RM she was dating “a prince.” She also told Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne excitedly that she was dating “Prince Harry!” Yet on the mockumentary, That One claimed she didn’t know who he was, and said an unknowing, “Prince Haz?” to Violet.

At that point RM offered to send clothes to That One for her “new life” because she would need many new clothes.

That One allegedly did not offer to pay for, or return, these loaner clothes. RM’s assistant mistakenly contacted Catherine’s office in Kensington Palace about the issue, instead of the Todgers’ assistants, so everyone in Catherine’s office knew about it.

That One was so humiliated she told RM “You don’t know what you’ve done! You’ve embarrassed me… You know I can never wear your clothes again.” Dan says That One was “doing what she does, ghosting people for stupid reasons.”

Paula F compares RM’s “innocent mistake” to Tom Markle’s “innocent photo shoot”. That One “does not accept apologies, but also never apologizes… she is always right… everything is a direct cut against her.”

Paula “feels vindicated” after reporting on That One taking from photo shoots “for her archive” which is really “her closet.” Paula wrote about a “five finger discount”, “Liam McGuire threatened to sue” her for writing that story and “screamed” at her that That One “signed a contract” to take what she wanted from the photo shoot. Liam says he has a relative in the industry who can back him up but won’t let them speak to Paula, never sued her but “planted a story in Newsweek” saying they would sue for this “false story.”

Dan said That One was “extremely embarrassed to have Catherine the Princess of Wales find out about it“. It seems alleged that That One was embarrassed for getting caught and that this was not just a mistake. Compare to Catherine who holds herself with high integrity, and started her marriage specifically saying she would not accept offers of free clothes. Imagine Catherine’s shock and I’m sure William also found out about it. That One looks very tawdry in comparison; no wonder she was humiliated.

We now know why Catherine was steering clear of That One and not giving her a ride to the shops, or Wimbledon hand holding, for good reason. Catherine did not want to sully her reputation with cheap freebie grabbing. Or “five finger discounts.”

The Todger hypocrisy knows no bounds, as reported in Spare that That One could make her own clothes; and that the staff was asked to resign for accepting freebies, but That One was allegedly the one keeping clothes that were not paid for.

Apparently they made up because That One still wore a RM design for an asever photo. But after this book, I doubt they will be friends again.

An early famous blind alleged that there was a scheme to bill Charles full price for clothes that were free and then split the profits. We are starting to see bits of possible evidence come to fruition.

“How do you make a little extra money if you have no income and are not allowed to work to generate any income but definitely have some things you want to buy and others you need to pay off to keep things quiet? Well, if you are this former actress you get clothes from friends that were given to them for free that you will wear. You then have the person in charge of the checkbook buy those clothes at full market value. The friends then split the money with our former actress 50/50. She is actually making more money now from this little ruse than she ever did acting or yachting. She was never a really big earner yachting wise.”

BLIND ITEM #9

A documentary crew was front and center during the recent "public" appearance. Go look at the call for extras in one of the London trades too. Oh, and if you think the jewelry dupes of the mother-in-law are going to be called out for that, they will not be. Will they find the person I know on the production team. No. Will they try? Probably.

From ODN on facebook.

Designer Roland Mouret wrote in his memoir that Meghan erupted after one of his staff contacted Kensington Palace instead of the duchess's team to arrange the return of the items.

Meghan allegedly told him the blunder had humiliated her and declared she could never wear his designs again.

He wrote: 'Meghan was furious and called me. "You don't realise what you've done! You've embarrassed me".'

Mouret does not say exactly when the row happened, only that it was after Meghan and Harry's 'relationship became public' but before Megxit in 2020. 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Nottingham visit sparks police intervention as GB News footage shows crowds blocking car (archived)

"Harry and Meghan's Nottingham visit sparks police intervention as GB News footage shows crowds blocking car"

They couldn't let yesterday's visit go by without another security incident for RAVEC's file on them.

It was just the police moving people out of the way from the car.

This was on ChrisBaronSmith's Instagram reel. Looks like it's originally from French Marie Claire.

So these women just happened to be there in 2017, just happened to have a photo of this life changing event and just happened to get a selfie with her. My GOD, the acting is over the top. And as ever, a mention of MY HUZ-BAND. Enjoy the madness.

This came across my TikTok feed from an account called Dame Tea.

Greetings from Castle Goring,   before I plunge in, I would like to make the point that Harry and Meghan may deceive themselves that they can give the Margaret Thatcher Victory sign <Lady C shows us a “V” with her two finders> to The King and The British People.  It is not working out like that.  It is all smoke and mirrors. 

Lady C, it was a poor turnout.  More media there than members of the public.  Harry and Meghan are playing a clever game.  They are now recruiting the Rota into their camp.  Remember back when the Rota was their enemy?  No matter how Meghan and Harry spin, the truth is the event was not the success they wanted it to be, despite the advance notice.  Remember, they went out of their way to give notice where they would be?  They “reached out” to their followers, school children, people of color and about 40 people showed up. Can you imagine, how much effort Harry, Meghan and their people went through to get those 40 or so people?   It is Australia all over again.  They used to have thousands of people turn out for them.  It was very clever of them.  They tried to recreate their first public engagement.

Lady C, some reporters were trying to make it seem like the crowds were bigger than they were.  Credit to Tom Sykes and Avid Gardner for telling us the truth.  I am very fond of Tom.  He made it his business to go.  He also went to Geneva to witness Meghan giving a speech to 3 or 4 people.  I thought Meghan looked better than she normally does.  The clothes fit and I thought she decided to take a page out of Catherine’s book, except for Meghan wanted to show us her legs.  She thinks she has fabulous legs.  Betty Grable and Cyd Charisse had fabulous legs.  The Jamaicans would say Meghan has “chicken foot.”  That means skinny legs and ugly feet.

Lady C, how embarrassing.  Over 100 Rota reporters, a few school kids who were probably forced to attend, a few old ladies, and Security.  No doubt, Harry and Meghan will think this was a great success.  However, the reality here is that Harry and Meghan are ignoring and disrespecting The King’s wishes.  This is a very dreadful message for two “public figures” who say they support the monarchy.  Harry and Meghan don’t care.  It is all about what they want.  They want attention.  Harry thinks he is more important than he is and Meghan wants Harry to be more important than he is so she can think she is more important.

Lady C, the BBC had full coverage of Harry and Meghan’s first public engagement.  Why is the BBC contradicting the edict of The King?  I think the BBC is being irresponsible considering the BBC is being subsidized by the taxpayer.  They are left wing and anti-monarchist.  They think they are enlightened and should be supporting an underdog.  But centrist and right leaning organizations are covering them also, like The Mail.  They all loving this. They think undermining The King is great fun.  But they are undermining the British People who support the monarchy.  The media are undermining our civil liberties, because THEY want to make money and generate power.

Lady C, all of this is a poor reflection on respect people have for The King.  It is.  It makes you wonder what has to happen to shake The King?  The media are assisting Harry and Meghan and Harry and Meghan are not honoring the Sandringham Agreement.  They are not allowed to capitalize on Royal Status yet that is exactly what they are doing.  Meghan has always been contemptuous.  Even as a little girl.  If Meghan wants to do something, she will do it.  However, I do not think this is anything more than a storm in a teacup and I will tell you why.  This visit was not a success.  It is being presented as a success by the media who are now in Harry and Meghan’s pocket.  But they people are not deceived.  Harry and Meghan are so unpopular, most people “turn off” rather than “turn on.”  The average person will not watch them.  Harry and Meghan are allowed public visits, but what the media is doing is assisting Harry and Meghan with the façade of Royalty.  But all of this has made people very angry and very upset.  People need to direct their anger to the BBC and the Mainstream media.

Lady C, I don’t get it.  Meghan is being painted as “amazing,” and the media is airbrushing away the last 6 years.  They got away with it (their time in America).  I bet they will be back as working Royals in the new year.  Why can’t The King and William do something about this?  The King and William can’t put a stop to this overtly.  Harry and Meghan as private citizens have the right to organize a public spectacle.  What they will be doing and having people do on their behalf, is making it known that anyone who receives Harry and Meghan will not be received by either of them.  And if someone makes a mistake, that person may be privately spoken to.  There are ways to deal with things, but it will not be immediate.  The Royal Family will always look at the long term and not react to things in the immediate.   I have heard that Harry and Meghan are seriously worried about their ability to win people over.  They are desperate.  They are unpopular.  They are disempowered.  Meghan doesn’t like the UK.  Harry doesn’t like how he is being treated.  Harry spends most of his time at Soho house hanging out with his bodyguard.  This is the same thing he did in Montecito.  They need money and Meghan is never going to make the tens and hundreds of millions that they need to keep going.  Meghan is always spinning.  And now she is spinning that she wants to return to acting.  What role will she play?  She is not going to be cast as a leading lady.  Have you seen her lately?  She has so many lines now.  If I had that many lines at her age, I would be seriously worried, and Meghan has them all over her face.  She has crevices and she wears these desperate smiles.

Lady C, I have spent my entire life in the lower class.  The only thing I have learned is to never underestimate a fool.  I have watched H&M wreak havoc over all spheres of influence.  The only fortunate thing about them is they will invariably be caught in their own web of deceit.  The saddest part is their children and families will be caught up in all this damage.  This is malice.  This is stupidity.  This is viciousness.  Albert Einstein one said, “any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex.”  Some people say Meghan is dumb.  She is not dumb.  She is an intelligent fool.  It takes courage and intelligence to move in the opposite direction.  Meghan can’t do that.  Meghan thinks being oppositional shows character, it does not.  It shows stupidity.  Meghan doesn’t understand when to conform and when not to.  She does not understand when to exercise judgement and when to let something go.  Harry and Meghan are mischievous.  They are contemptuous.  They have not yet figured their antics have not resulted in success.  All that has happened is people talk about them too much.  They are attention addicts. 

Lady C, if those children were hers, she would have regaled us with the details of the births and milked her protocol on the hospital steps for all it was worth.  They are not livid, and they do nothing to disprove all the talk.  No DNA test, no denials.  My information is she loves all the speculation and all the damage to the Royal Family.  It feels like insanity.  This question captures the essence of why people believe Meghan did not give birth to the children.  Meghan could solve this.  With DNA test and signs offs from the attending physicians.  That is all she needs to do.  Meghan did not do this.  She provided a scan of the baby but this does not prove anything.

Toodles Sinners!

And on cue, they are claiming police intervention,

From that_1 on X.

However, they don’t go so far as to connect Meghan to them.

This sub should provide supporting evidence!

Can’t link as the article’s on an app, but it’s reproduced in full (excluding some mugshots of Meghan).