After Jeffrey Dahmer is found legally sane in his 1992 trial, Dr. Fred Berlin, who worked for the defense team, is quoted in the Netflix documentary âConversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapesâ as saying the following:
âIf a man is preoccupied with having sex with corpses, if a man whoâs drilling holes in the heads of human beings to try to keep them alive in a zombie-like state doesnât have a psychiatric disorder, then I donât know what we mean by psychiatric disease. How many people does someone have to eat in Milwaukee before they think you have a mental disease?â
I was shocked he went on record saying this. I found his comments disingenuous, manipulative, and clearly biased. No one is saying Jeffrey Dahmer was not mentally ill. But the law is VERY clear. In order to be found not guilty by reason of insanity in the court of law, the defense needed to prove that Jeffrey Dahmer did not understand the difference between right and wrong at the time of each crime. Obviously he was mentally ill! But not mentally ill to the degree that he should not be held legally responsible for his crimes under the American legal system.
As a forensic psychiatrist, Dr. Berlin damn well knows what the legal definition of ânot guilty by reason of insanityâ really means. His comments ignored the legal definition of the insanity plea and made it seem like the jury and the American public at large was ignorant about psychiatric illnesses, was perhaps phobic of mentally ill criminal offenders, and justice was not delivered.
What a red flag of a âprofessional.â
Did this stick out to anyone else, and what are your thoughts? Can you imagine being one the victimsâ family members and hearing this bullshit? To imply that Jeffrey Dahmer met the legal definition of insanity and the jury verdict was a miscarriage of justice must be such a slap in the face to all the people who suffered. This pmo soooo bad, and I donât even have a personal stake in the matter.