I got curious about this and assumed local newspapers from that area for this restaurant possibly not altered. It looks like this restaurant started not as a chicken sandwich but sandwich was licensed to other restaurants under the name chic fil a. I found actual ads, menu listing in the archives. Interestingly text in the headlines, title were replaced sometimes even if it is inside the archives. Logos are replaced in the archives and timemachine website references as well. Text inside the contextual things are not replaced properly. Search pretexts or website link names are not replaced. If page title says like chic-fil-a-something, that stayed but actual title on the page is different. That is so funny to see. Yandex search engine indexed some pages with old spelling as well.

Here are some things you can check before they modified:

Some more popular newspaper got mixed results:

There are later major-paper examples too: the Washington Post’s July 4, 2007 article⁠ uses “Chic-fil-A of Waldorf.”  There are similar results for Jiffy peanut butter like earlier references uses that.

1- Why is this tool whatever used in here perfect on images but not some text inside the paragraph etc?

2- Why do they do this? Pretend like this never happened?

3- Is this tool able to change physical papers, clothes etc?

I tried to get to the bottom of this infamous Mandela effect because I grew up in a country where Fruit of the Loom doesn’t exist. But STILL I have a vivid memory of the image of this horn-shaped basket with fruit in it. And the supposed Mandela Effect logo looks very familiar. Why?

I came to a fairly simple answer: It was a common design element in the 90s and 2000s. It was everywhere. Nowadays even in Europe the Halloween pumpkin has become the go-to symbol for an autumn theme. But back then, harvest symbolism was more widespread.
If you look up „Horn of Plenty“ (that’s what this symbol is called) you will find hundreds of images that look like this.

TLDR: There really was a cornucopia with fruit in it, but it wasn’t on the Fruit of the Loom logo. You probably just saw it somewhere else.
And this was probably a memory from a time when you couldn’t read yet. So you wouldn’t have been able to tell what the logo stood for.