It’s a follow up to my first post here.
First of all thank you everyone for sharing your experiences and thoughts. It seems like we will be proceeding with a purchase. But it gave me and my wife things to discuss and reconsider.
Since the value of the property is mainly derived from the land, we are reevaluating an option we initially discarded. It’s a secondhand property in the same area as the new house we are currently purchasing. It sits on a larger plot of land, but it has its own imperfections.
We wanted to get an opinion if the secondhand hand house is actually a better option and its shortcomings are worth accepting.
About the new house:
- Pre-built detached house, 4LDK. It’s located in the south of Tokyo (Setagaya-Meguro-Shinagawa) along one of the major Tokyu Lines. Plot: 80 sq.m. Corner lot. The house: 125sq. m plus parking. Cost: 160M.
- Things we don’t like. Feels like, and is, a generic cookie cutter house. Built by a small local construction company, so we are not sure if it’s an issue or not in terms of quality. Complies with the lowest earthquake resistance required by law. Again I’m not sure if it’s a usual thing or not.
Secondhand option:
- 注文自宅 by 住友不動産. 10 years old. 4LDK. Same location as the above. Plot: 105 sq.m. The house: 135 sq.m. plus parking. Cost: 160M probably possible to negotiate to around 155M. Two access roads (at the front and the back of the house).
- Things we don’t like. There is one room that on paper is 7畳 but it’s not rectangular. It’s more like a trapezoid, so it has a sharp angle which essentially reduces its useful space. It needs some renovation work which will add to the total cost. The kitchen is not an open space, it’s isolated from the LD. I’m sure the separating paper wall can be removed and kitchen remodeled to be like an open space LDK, but not sure how much it’s gonna cost us. Lastly the owners apparently have mental health issues. The house isn’t well kept, looked like a hoarder house. Also we heard from the real estate agent that due the mental illness the were difficult to work with. So it makes us worry if they might create problems in the middle of the sale process.
So yeah, neither of them is perfect. If we remove the issues coming from the current owners, I would say I liked the secondhand house more, it felt cozier and not generic. Counting the fact that it has 25 sq. m. bigger plot of land, I’m thinking it will have more value in case we decide to liquidate. But the new house is ready to move in option, with no renovation or possible interaction with unstable owners.
Are we complicating everything, should we just go with our original plan? Or is it worth stopping for a bit to reevaluate the secondhand option?