r/HomeworkHelp • u/Jars_Of_Honey7194 👋 a fellow Redditor • 13h ago
Answered [Highschool physics: circuits]
Apparently the answer is (d) but I have no idea how to get there
2
u/No_Pattern3827 👋 a fellow Redditor 12h ago
According to Kirchhoff, the sum of the voltages must be 40V.
V1+V2+V12=40V where V12 is the parallel R1-R2.
By inserting your data, you can write
10V+V2+(10V*V2)/(10V+V2)=40V and solve the equation with unknown V2
2
u/GammaRayBurst25 12h ago
Read rule 3.
Suppose without loss of generality that R_1=x and R_2=kx.
We can replace the two resistors in parallel with a single resistor with a resistance of 1/(1/x+1/(kx))=kx/(1+k) to get an equivalent circuit.
Ohm's law gives us 3 expressions for the current through the battery.
i.e. (10V)/x=(V_2)/(kx)=(30V-V_2)(1+k)/(kx)
Multiply by kx to find (10V)k=V_2=(30V-V_2)(1+k).
Hence, (10V)k=(30V-(10V)k)(1+k). Distribute and solve to find the only positive solution is k=(1+sqrt(13))/2.
Conclude that V_2=5(1+sqrt(13))V, which is approximately 23V.
As the problem is worded, none of the options are correct, as none of the options are equal to V_2.
1
u/Jars_Of_Honey7194 👋 a fellow Redditor 12h ago edited 12h ago
Sorry for not explaining how I thought about it at first. I didn't think of using mathematics and thought that the given info that R2 > R1 was the key,
I thought that, first knowing that a resistance of R1 had a potential difference of 10V,
and in the parallel resistance, the total resistance must be less than the least resistance there,
so R12 > R1, since R1 is smaller than R2
so I thought that since a resistance of R2 had a potential difference of 10, a resistance that's less than R2 must have a potential difference less than ten for the ratio that V1/V12 = R1/R12 to hold true,
so since V1 is 10, V12 is less than 10, and V2 is the remainder of those two from 40, V2 would exist in a range where, supposing V12 is the least possible, being close to 0, and then the most possible, being 9.999 or something
V2 exists in the range ]20, 30[ volt,
But in the choices there were three choices in that range and i only managed to exclude (c) so i had no idea how to get a more accurate answer.
Do you think my way of thinking could have worked if the choices were in my favor? Or was it flawed from the beginning?
Honestly, i still haven't verified if my reasoning was correct in the first place or not.
2
u/Bounded_sequencE 👋 a fellow Redditor 11h ago edited 6h ago
Assume both resistances are positive, i.e. "R2 > R1 > 0". Assuming "V1, V2" points west:
1/4 = 10V/40V = R1 / (R1 + R2 + (R1||R2)) // voltage divider
= R1*(R1+R2) / [(R1+R2)^2 + R1*R2] // R1||R2 = R1*R2 / (R1+R2)
= (1 + x) / [(1 + x)^2 + x] // x := R2/R1 > 0
Multiply by "4[(1+x)2 + x]", and bring everything to one side to get the quadratic
"0 = (1+x)^2 + x - 4(1+x) = x^2 - x - 3" <=> "x ∈ { (1±√13) / 2 }"
Since "x > 0" we discard the negative solution, so "x = (1 + √13) / 2". With another voltage divider:
V2 = V1 * R2/R1 = 10V * x = 5*(1+√13) V ~ 23V
1
u/Jars_Of_Honey7194 👋 a fellow Redditor 11h ago
/lock
1
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Done! This thread is now locked. :)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
2
u/InTheRaw1 12h ago
Just plug in each value. If option a) were the correct answer, V2 =27. Then the voltage across the combined resistance of R1 parallel R2 should be 40-10-27=3V . Now, iR1=10, iR2=27, Now see if i times parallel combination of R1 and R2 results in 3V or something different. If it's something different option a) is incorrect. Go to the next one.