r/Hedera • • 9h ago

ĦBAR Hedera Council, please increase max HBAR allowed to stake for rewards

26 Upvotes

Hedera's staking rewards algorithm only allows 13% of the total HBAR supply to be staked for full rewards. If more than 6.5 billion HBAR are staked for rewards then the maximum reward rate suffers. Currently over 8.3 billion HBAR are staked for rewards so the maximum reward rate is not the 2.5% it could be.

This problem will not be solved by more transactions and fees on the network. Even if the network reaches the point where fees are self sufficient to fund the staking rewards - the maximum reward rate will continue to be less than 2.5% unless:

A. The Hedera Council increases this limit of 13%/6.5B HBAR can stake for full rewards.

B. Less HBAR is staked for rewards.

A is definitely my preferred option. B is not likely unless many people are dumping their HBAR. I wrote this to remind HBAR holders of this detail so hopefully more will call for change and it can reach those that can actually make the decision. Please throw the retail Hedera users and HBAR holders a bone.


r/Hedera • • 13h ago

Discussion Hedera's Role in the Future of Tokenized Finance: Insights from the 2026 IMF-World Bank Meetings

Thumbnail youtube.com
19 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 13h ago

Discussion hedera hit its lowest average transaction fee of the past quarter on October 17.

Post image
50 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 1d ago

Media Hedera History with Swirlds Employee #7 - The Boeing Use Case

Thumbnail x.com
17 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 1d ago

News Busiest account on Hedera last week

Post image
61 Upvotes

The busiest account on Hedera last week was 0.0.10890958, with over 818,000 txns.

This account is part of the SRA DigiSeva use-case, a smart governance initiative launched by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) of Brihanmumbai in Mumbai, India.

You can learn more about the use case at https://exhibition.skoch.in/exhibition/slum-rehabilitation-authority-brihanmumbai-2/

Source of the screenshot is http://unstealth.app


r/Hedera • • 1d ago

ĦBAR HBAR back in Top 10 👀

Thumbnail
gallery
101 Upvotes

Relative CB rank and volume climbing steadily overnight, combined with a 12% increase in Mainnet activity. Both relative and absolute positive movement.

Let’s have a Sunday!


r/Hedera • • 2d ago

Developer CLPR Change Watch: October 16, 2026

26 Upvotes

Meaningful progress: Hedera deployed the release family containing feature-gated CLPR, SHA-256 support merged, and broader testing became standard. A new Connector-registration fix also merits a follow-up security check.

Statuses reflect the October 16 review.

1. Mainnet upgraded to v0.78.1, but this is not CLPR activation.

Hedera reports that its mainnet upgrade completed on October 16 at 17:26 UTC. The v0.78 release notes include CLPR explicitly behind a feature flag. This advances CLPR from inclusion in testnet software to inclusion in the release family now deployed on mainnet. It does not establish that native CLPR messaging has been enabled. Upgrade confirmation · Release notes

Effect on the previous assessment: deployment packaging has progressed. Activation and demonstrated production traffic remain separate milestones.

Economic implication: this shortens the path to eventual public-network use, but the upgrade alone does not demonstrate Connector revenue or incremental CLPR-generated HBAR fees.

2. Lower-cost proof support is now merged.

PR 27336 merged on October 16, advancing the SHA-256 work from proposal to upstream implementation.

It adds configurable SHA-256 hashing for block roots and associated CLPR proofs. SHA-384 remains the default. The separate platform-default change remains open. The PR also continues to identify missing first-restart/migration coverage and a disabled captured-proof replay test awaiting refreshed data.

The final CI report reports 12,326 tests executed, all passing, with 93 checks completed. These are repository-level results, not proof that every SHA-256 deployment scenario is covered.

Effect on the previous finding: the cost-reduction implementation is merged. A coordinated production switch and complete migration validation are still outstanding.

Economic implication, analysis: cheaper verification on EVM destinations could make Hedera-origin cross-ledger activity more economical. That improves the potential market for Hedera-hosted applications without imposing an artificial requirement that every external transaction use HBAR.

3. Connector-registration hardening merged, with a possible remaining bypass.

PR 27689 merged on October 16. It rejects duplicate Channel and Connector commitments and retains Connector commitments after completion, deregistration and banning. Its stated objective includes preventing recreation under the same Connector ID.

The test report reports 58,062 tests executed, all passing.

Static-review finding: the broader non-reuse guarantee does not appear fully enforced.

The completion handler still accepts an existing commitment when the Connector record is absent. The deregistration handler removes that record while leaving the commitment present.

Consequently, replaying completion after removal appears capable of recreating the Connector without repeating registration, provided the other checks and stake funding succeed. Creation initializes its slash count to zero. The added lifecycle test checks repeated registration, not this repeated-completion path.

This is a potential remaining defect identified from code, not a reproduced network exploit or maintainer-confirmed vulnerability.

Economic implication: durable Connector identity matters for penalty history and accountability. This deserves a targeted regression test before treating permanent ID retirement as resolved. It does not imply that previously forfeited stake can be recovered.

4. CLPR testing is becoming routine.

Two testing changes merged on October 16.

PR 27619 enables CLPR by default in HAPI test-network and shared development configuration, exposing interactions with other services. Disabled-path tests remain.

PR 27465 consolidates multi-network fixtures, preserves captured ports and documents cold-start versus warm-restart procedures.

Each final CI report records 7,480 tests executed, all passing. These are separate runs, not necessarily distinct tests to add together. 27619 results · 27465 results

Effect: better repeatability and broader regression detection. Enabling CLPR in development configuration does not enable it on Hedera mainnet.

5. New cryptography release reduces repeated verification work.

Hiero Cryptography v3.22.0 was published at 00:10 UTC on October 17, during the October 16 evening in the US. Release · PR 755

It caches eight recent WRAPS-proof verification results, keyed by the proof, ledger identity and hinTS verification key. The individual message’s signature is still verified on every call.

Economic implication, analysis: reusing verification results can reduce operator computation when many messages share the same proof context. This is an implementation optimization, not a published end-to-end throughput benchmark.

The inspected consensus-node main revision still pins its core cryptography dependency to 3.15.0. Therefore, publication of 3.22.0 does not establish adoption by native CLPR. It also does not replace the separate Ethereum BLS verifier.

Related PR 752 remains open. On October 16, review identified cache-eviction and concurrency defects in an earlier revision. The author subsequently rewrote the cache. This advances support for overlapping cryptographic contexts, but it should not yet be counted as a merged, fully validated fix.

6. Observability design and project administration advanced.

The October 16 revision of the open Mirror Node design PR 14362 improves how proposed APIs derive configuration from actual consensus state rather than submitted transaction fields.

It also explicitly documents a retention limitation: for locally sent messages, the proposed state-change importer can expose acknowledgment progress but does not retain the incoming reply’s status and bytes. This refines the earlier historical-evidence finding. It is still a design, not a deployed API.

There is already fresh documentation drift: the design describes Connector commitments being removed at completion, which conflicts with the newly merged retention change above.

Separately, LFDT governance PR 22 merged on October 16, adding named release-engineering, endpoint, smart-contract, specification and security teams. This strengthens project organization, not protocol security certification.

The direction remains constructive: CLPR is progressing through deployment packaging, integration testing and verification-cost reduction. The Connector lifecycle review illustrates why passing CI and a merged fix must still be checked against the intended economic guarantees.

The standalone LFDT specification, contracts and endpoint main branches remain at the audited baseline revisions, without new releases or tags. No new application-facing Connector tariff, Hashgraph Connector-operation announcement, production CLPR revenue or attributable public-HBAR usage evidence was identified.


r/Hedera • • 2d ago

Developer CLPR Change Watch: October 3–15, 2026

30 Upvotes

CLPR made substantial progress between October 3 and October 15, 2026. HIP-1535 is now approved, a direct fix for the Hiero Channel-binding finding has merged, and dedicated CLPR tests are part of Hiero’s CI. The implementation also shipped in Hedera’s testnet software behind a feature flag. Larger cryptographic changes remain under review.

The most consequential developments are below. Dates refer to the source records in UTC. Statuses reflect the October 15 review.

1. October 7: HIP-1535 approved and merged.

HIP-1535 merged as 042ea686. Its status changed from Draft to Approved, with Hashgraph identified as the requester.

I compared the current document with the original audit revision. The body is unchanged. The changes are approval metadata, discussion link and update date.

This replaces the previous “HIP remains open” finding. It is a formal governance milestone, while implementation readiness and network activation remain separate decisions.

2. October 8: CLPR reached distributed testnet software.

Hedera’s official v0.78 release notes explicitly include the CLPR implementation behind a feature flag. The testnet upgrade completed October 8. This updates our previous position that the implementation existed only in upstream development code. Release notes · Network status

This establishes software distribution, not CLPR activation. Current Hiero main still defaults clpr.enabled to false. The separate proposal to enable CLPR throughout HAPI test networks, PR 27619, remains open and concerns development/testing configurations.

Mainnet is listed as v0.77.5. I found no official announcement of native CLPR activation on mainnet.

3. October 14: the specific Hiero Channel-binding defect was addressed.

PR 27592, merged as 34483a4b, contains a significant security fix beyond its maintenance-oriented title.

The native Hiero verifier now consumes the supplied Channel context, rejects missing or truncated context, and requires the proven Channel ID to match the requested Channel.

It also includes a regression test using a captured, genuinely signed proof. Verification succeeds for its correct Channel and fails for a different Channel.

Assessment: this directly addresses the earlier wrong-Channel acceptance finding. It should no longer be described as entirely unresolved. It does not establish the correctness of every verifier or every aspect of Channel identity. Verifier code

The same merge improves consensus determinism by sourcing configuration trust anchors from consensus history state rather than node-local snapshot availability.

4. October 5–12: Connector operation and economic safeguards improved.

Two previously proposed changes are now merged.

On October 5, PR 27429 added guards against overflow in slashing arithmetic and prevented duplicate transaction IDs during rapid bundle submission. This makes penalties and repeated submissions more reliable. It does not change the commercial fee model.

On October 12, PR 27380 changed Connector authorization to execute within the sending transaction’s EVM call stack. Connectors can update storage and emit logs, with rollback if authorization, sending or an enclosing call fails. This gives operators a more useful foundation for spending limits, authorization accounting and commercial services.

The authorization change preserves the existing 50,000-gas stipend and billing policy.

Analysis: these are practical improvements for operating Connectors. They do not introduce a standardized application-facing tariff, actual-gas reimbursement or a revenue allocation to Hashgraph.

5. October 7–14: endpoint trust, recovery and shutdown received concrete fixes.

Several related changes merged.

PR 27436, October 7, makes proven endpoint manifests the sole endpoint-distribution mechanism. Manifest versions come from proven state, and obsolete verifier interfaces are removed.

PR 27498, October 8, fixes an empty-manifest replacement that previously left stale endpoints cached. It now replaces the cache and rebuilds the inbound mTLS CA trust index.

PR 27517, October 14, removes the deprecated endpoints field from ledger configuration.

PR 27497, October 14, removes the obsolete discovery RPC.

PR 27592, October 14, allows closing Channels to propagate their proven shutdown status even with empty message queues.

Assessment: endpoint replacement and orderly shutdown now have stronger implementation support. These changes do not establish per-Channel mTLS authorization or complete verifier trust-anchor rotation.

The maintenance work also introduces explicit internal block-stream transactions for initialization and manifest maintenance. They charge no fees, so their appearance in a stream should not be counted as paid CLPR usage. Maintenance transaction design

6. October 14–15: CLPR testing became more systematic and exposed remaining integration problems.

PR 27354 merged October 14, wiring the CLPR, embedded and multi-network HAPI suites into regular MATS CI. This is stronger evidence than merely having test files in a development branch. Its final TestLens report records 7,476 tests executed, all passing, across the reported run, not exclusively CLPR tests. Report

Two follow-ups remain proposed.

PR 27606 enables stream/log validation and fixes issues it exposed, including lost boundary singleton changes, attribution of contract storage writes and embedded-test races.

PR 27547 improves parallel execution of multi-network tests.

Assessment: the project is moving toward repeatable integration validation. Passing summaries must still be interpreted against the exact revision, enabled checks and scenarios.

7. October 6–15: a substantial TSS/WRAPS upgrade is proposed, with new cryptographic releases available.

Open PR 27506 proposes adopting cryptography 3.20.1, universal WRAPS history proofs and a more explicit lifecycle for roster changes and cryptographic setup.

Material changes include a 64-byte ledger identity, generation-bound cryptographic state, startup verification support for CLPR-only nodes and revised proof sizes/gas allowances. The author reports a local genesis WRAPS proof taking approximately 22 seconds on a specified laptop setup. That is useful development evidence, not a production benchmark.

The latest CI is not passing: TestLens reports 113 failed tests within the CLPR multi-network task, out of 57,931 tests executed overall. Published failures include setup transactions returning WAITING_FOR_LEDGER_ID. These results establish an integration problem, not 113 independently diagnosed protocol defects. October 15 test report

Meanwhile, the cryptography repository released two updates.

v3.21.0, October 13 checks that WRAPS verification binds the genesis hinTS key as well as the genesis address book, and adds a verifier-oriented artifact.

v3.21.1, October 15 rejects identity-point partial signatures and hardens batch verification against invalid signatures whose errors cancel.

Current Hiero main still pins the TSS components to 3.15.0. The open adoption PR pins 3.20.1, so the newer fixes cannot yet be credited to those node dependency revisions.

Analysis: faster, more robust proof infrastructure could reduce operating costs and improve trust-anchor transitions. Dependency adoption and passing end-to-end validation remain necessary.

8. October 14–15: SHA-256 verification work advanced across repositories.

Block Node PR 3780 merged October 14, implementing SHA-256 block hashing and verification support.

The corresponding consensus-node PR 27336 remains open. Its latest report now shows 12,326 tests passing, with a recorded flaky retry and an outstanding codeowner check. This improves on the failing results reported October 2. Current report

The proposal retains SHA-384 as the default. Its description still identifies first-restart migration and SHA-256 HAPI coverage as unfinished. Block Node’s new verifier rejects unsupported hash formats, making coordinated rollout important.

Economic implication: this continues the effort to make Hiero-origin proofs cheaper to verify on EVM destinations. Those savings improve the attractiveness of cross-ledger applications, while public-HBAR capture depends on the Hedera-mainnet activity those applications generate.

9. October 14: new tests explicitly document unresolved QBFT adapter behavior.

Alongside the Channel-binding fix, PR 27592 adds tests whose comment explicitly describes unsafe adapter behavior. They demonstrate that the QBFT adapter can return relay-supplied metadata and trust-anchor values when the mocked underlying verifier has not authenticated those values. Tests

Assessment: this is new, explicit repository evidence of an unresolved proof-binding concern, separate from the earlier QBFT quorum-model finding. Because the tests mock the cryptographic verifier, they are not an end-to-end exploit demonstration.

The native Ethereum path also still uses the accepting FakeBlsSignatureVerifier. The new TSS releases do not replace that Ethereum-specific placeholder.

External contributions and proposals remain separate from adopted CLPR functionality.

On October 7, community HIP proposals covering Channel recovery, financial security profiles, canonical asset transfers and intent settlement were closed without merging. The intent-settlement proposal is therefore not part of approved HIP-1535. PR 1543 · 1544 · 1545 · 1546

On October 5, external PRs 37 and 38 documented a Hedera contract-trace size constraint and proposed staging Ethereum sync committees across smaller transactions. The author supplies testnet transaction links for Channel opening and committee rotation. These are author-reported testnet demonstrations from an unmerged fork, not native Ethereum-verifier remediation or production usage.

Also on October 5, CLPRouter’s reference-application proposal offered routing and bonded-settlement tests, with explicit testnet-only and no-external-audit disclosures. Its one-way Channel discussion identifies an economically relevant limitation: without reverse acknowledgements, outstanding-message quotas eventually stop further sending. No protocol change has been adopted.

On October 14–15, external Sei verifier PR 41 proposed a fix for an address-alignment error in the Solidity storage comparison. A maintainer acknowledged it, but it remains unmerged. External draft spec PR 2 proposes aligning protobuf fields and verifier metadata with Hiero. It makes specification drift more concrete but does not yet resolve it.

The economic model has gained implementation maturity, not a new revenue entitlement. Connector authorization is more usable, penalties are safer and proof-cost reduction is progressing. Current native defaults still specify the flat execution-cost component and endpoint margin. No new official Connector tariff or Hashgraph-operated Connector business was documented.

The three LFDT implementation/specification main revisions remain at the audited baselines, with no standalone releases or tags. Native Hiero also removed message redaction on October 14, while explicitly deferring the coordinated running-hash change, another compatibility item to track. PR 27549

The newly verified milestones improve the route toward usable interoperability. Public-HBAR demand and attributable Hashgraph revenue still depend on funded, live commercial workflows. This review found no new verified mainnet CLPR volume, production liquidity, commercial revenue or independent audit report.


r/Hedera • • 2d ago

Discussion Crypto Firms Launch Quantum Alliance as 6 Million Bitcoin Sit Exposed

Thumbnail
decrypt.co
31 Upvotes
  1. Tick tock..

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

ĦBAR HederaWatch Site

59 Upvotes

Built a site to aggregate HBAR network, pricing and news/opinion data. The database started collecting data today in 5m intervals, so it’ll become more insightful as time goes on - particularly on network and pricing trends.

https://hederawatch.com/

Sharing here in case anyone finds it useful as things potentially get more interesting here. The site has stat regression and correlation calcs on historical data…tried to slice the network activity data a few ways. Automated scans for new news every few minutes, and an AI agent reads news sentiment. Pulling in all public feeds or posts.

10/18 UPDATE: geo mapping of submission nodes for tx activity, and greater fee/tx type detail. New “TX Map” page. Updated kpi bar with chart links. And a much more lightweight dashboard engine to be resource efficient in browsers 🙌

Cheers!


r/Hedera • • 3d ago

Use Case/DApp Unstealth beta launch

24 Upvotes

Just a quick update to let people who signed up for the Unstealth beta know we've sent out invites for the first batch of testers, so if you've signed up make sure to check your inbox, if it's not there it may have gone to spam.

The app is still relatively early in development so it still has plenty of rough edges, but I wanted to get it into the hands of users early so they can help guide development and make it as useful to the community as possible.

I've included some screenshots of some of the tools and features in the app below to give you some idea of what we're up to.

Beta sign ups are still open for the next batch, we'll likely keep it running for a month or two longer, anyone who wants to try it out is welcome to sign up at https://unstealth.app

Account detail page header
Interaction map
Lineage tracker
Live network map

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

Media What Has Hedera ACTUALLY Accomplished in 2026?

Thumbnail
youtu.be
18 Upvotes

In this video I cover the near 20 major accomplishments/headlines in 2026 that Hedera was a part of.


r/Hedera • • 3d ago

Media HBAR Weekly Update - How Does the Canton and Hedera Revenue Stack Up?

Thumbnail
youtube.com
20 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

Discussion Building networks for AI at scale?Explore our curated Networking for AI track at #NVIDIAGTC Berlin to learn how accelerated networking helps scale AI factories, secure agentic workflows, and optimize infrastructure.

Thumbnail
nvidia.com
17 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

News AI Agents will become first class citizens of all modern institutional trading venues.Today, Co-Founder @moralesonchain joins @1inch in DC on the panel "AI Agents and Autonomous Finance".

Post image
29 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

Media Introducing Hedera Agent Accounts

Thumbnail
youtu.be
34 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 3d ago

News $0.26 Call Emerges As HBAR Retraced After 100% Bounce

Thumbnail
dailycoin.com
50 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion What are the Top HBAR Projects?

32 Upvotes

I bought a large portion of HBAR back in 2019. Haven’t kept up with it much since purchasing. I’ve always seen it as more as a long term lottery ticket, but I’m debating on finally selling…

I’m wondering what the tops projects are that have REAL long term use cases?

Someone convince me why I shouldn’t sell and what projects will actually make HBAR valuable down the road. I’m talking 10+ years in the future. What will make HBAR valuable?


r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion Virginia's environmental regulator tracks its mandatory credit market, worth at least $472.5M from 2021 to 2025, on SWaN, built on Hedera by Water Ledger. Before SWaN, under 1% of trades had a visible price

Post image
91 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Media Hedera Leadership FAILED Its Builders?! Neuron, Acoer & DOVU

Thumbnail
youtu.be
0 Upvotes

In this video I break down how leaders in Hedera’s dapps are calling out Hedera leadership since the lawsuit against THA THG HV and executives has come to light.


r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Use Case/DApp Ħ BankSocial Opens Second Cohort for Substrate Platform Following Extraordinary Demand: Substrate is an enterprise-grade AI Operating System (AiOS) that unifies AI models, workflow decisions, and core institutional data within a secure, private environment (Private Cloud, Hybrid, On-Prem) Ħ

Thumbnail envisant.com
31 Upvotes

Envisant is a credit union service organization (CUSO) and a subsidiary of the Illinois Credit Union League. Founded in 1969 (originally known as LSC®), the company is headquartered in Naperville, Illinois, and serves more than 2,000 credit unions across all 50 states.

As a primary CUSO, Envisant works alongside BankSocial to deliver cutting-edge payment and artificial intelligence infrastructures across its extensive financial network


r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion When we say BIG we mean HUGE

Post image
74 Upvotes

Big moves happening in the world of financial institutions. 🏦

Substrate is built exclusively for FIs, and the institutions that matter are taking notice.

An AiOS built for the ones who move markets.

We're just getting started. 🚀


r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion Ħ Who else has noticed that the Hedera mainnet has been much more active this last week or two? (picture taken a minute ago). The baseline TPS is rising to double digits as well Ħ

Post image
106 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion hedera settled 855,925 transactions yesterday.

Post image
69 Upvotes

r/Hedera • • 4d ago

Discussion RiskStream Brings a $1.1 Trillion Insurance Market to Hedera With Tokenized Property Risk Data

Thumbnail
genfinity.io
44 Upvotes