The poor guy was sandwiched between two absolute titans of Chinese history. Yet, he kind of strikes me as the type of guy who doesn't need recognition in the same way I would assume a guy like Mao would.
That uneducated assumption is based on Mao having a cult of personality cult around him while Xiaoping seemed happier in the background.
In the West, Mao is portrayed as an ineffective governor but an effective warrior and general. Many Western scholars will claim that Chinese people were afraid to say no to the war hero, no matter how crazy an idea he had.
All of this is assumed to provide the freedom for Deng Xiaoping to implement massive reforms once he passed. These reforms seem to deserve most of the credit for putting China on such a successful path economically.
My knowledge of Chinese history is lacking and full of ignorance, so please feel free to correct me anywhere.
If you made it this far, let me try to rephrase the question:
Mao and Xi seem to dominate Chinese culture and history from where I sit looking in. However, from my very basic education of Chinese history, it feels like Deng Xiaoping deserves a lot more recognition than he gets.
Do Chinese history lessons or scholars try to give this man more of the credit I feel like he deserves, or am I just completely wrong on everything? Do Chinese ever try to compare or rank their leaders or is that something the CCP would frown upon?
Thank you for anyone willing to help me learn more about a country that is hard to learn about outside of a Western biased bubble.