r/ProgrammerHumor • • 9d ago

Meme forFutureReference

Post image
9.7k Upvotes

517 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/Lightningtow123 9d ago

Yeah my dad's worked cybersecurity for thirty years now and every company he's ever worked at, as soon as you put in your two weeks, your access is removed and you're off the job. You still get paid for those two weeks of course but you can't really steal anything after that point. Cause if someone quits a good cybersecurity job it's most likely to be to go work for a competitor. Of course it's a little bit dumb cause if they wanted to steal data they just wouldn't put in their two weeks, but it's standard practice, or so I thought. I'm surprised to learn that's not the case at all tech companies lol

3

u/varinator 8d ago

The secret here is to copy the code few days before giving notice. Points-to-head-meme

2

u/Appropriate-Emu-2595 9d ago

Isn't that what non compete clauses in contracts are for?

14

u/flingerdu 9d ago

In most jurisdictions you can‘t legally prevent a person from working for a competitor. You can only keep paying them for not doing so, however they‘re free to cancel that agreement if they want to.

3

u/Appropriate-Emu-2595 9d ago

In my current employment contract it says I am restricted from working with competitors of the company for 3 months after my contract is terminated, though I always wondered how enforceable this was.

9

u/ahvikene 9d ago

For example here it is only enforceable if company agrees to continue paying you plus extra you would make.

13

u/tiajuanat 9d ago

Those are largely unenforceable. Also it's very easy to be creative with "no these aren't the same roles, and were not really competitors"

4

u/Ran4 8d ago

That sounds extremely American-like.

In first world countries you're typically working for 2-3 months before quitting (this goes in both directions btw), so obviously you won't lose your access unless there's some sort of conflict involved.

2

u/mxzf 8d ago

It's a weird policy because, as you said, it's dumb. You're preventing them from doing something they could have done the day before giving their notice while stopping them from working to make a smooth handover to their successor.

Like, sure, remove their production DB access and whatnot, but static data that the person could have used before their notice is weird to cut off access to.