Another libslop has hit the internet

If you don’t know, on Twitter, or X of you really want to call it that, there has been an explosion in these black pro centrism accounts. These accounts are basically meant to bash leftists and progressives and are disguised as “pro black” activists who think leftists are anti black.

Of course we saw this through how Talarico supporters were smeared as racists even though I’m sure that most of them would’ve for sure supported Crockett in the general had she won. We also see this in Michigan where these guys claim Abdul el Sayed is anti black even with little proof of that at all.

However, some cracks started to show with Angie Nixon specifically since she is a black progressive candidate and who these guys don’t seem to like, or they seem to be less enthusiastic about her. Why? Because she’s endorsed by the DSA of course. And so these guys are now in a pickle where they can’t call her “anti black” and so they just need to say she “can’t win” or that being in the DSA will ruin her standing with black voters.

These guys also seem to not like Charles Booker of Kentucky, who isn’t endorsed by the DSA but did call Israel’s crimes in Gaza a genocide which probably is why Greg crossed him off her. A black candidate who isn’t even DSA endorsed and these guys still don’t like him.

And then we have Scott colom which I could say is only because he’s in Mississippi, but that’s not the reason. He’s not a leftist or progressive! He’s a moderate who has not even called what Israel has done in Gaza a genocide. And yet he’s crossed off because… he doesn’t take AIPAC money? That’s probably it since I can’t think of any other reason not to support the guy other than Mississippi being a reach, but Greg explained none of this unless I missed something.

And yeah, we have Abdul El Sayed and Troy Jackson crossed off. Why? El Sayed isn’t even a leftist but he’s Muslim and pro Palestine so he’s bad of course. Troy Jackson is one who these guys always hated because he’s platner’s replacement and they’d rather have Janet mills. I guess it’s also because he’s DSA endorsed, even though Jackson currently has been endorsed by J Street and has moved right on Israel Palestine.

The only thing I’ll give credit for is that he’s at least supporting Talarico but even then, that’s probably only because he realized not only that not supporting Talarico would be stupid but that some on the left criticized him so I guess that means Talarico is good for that reason.

Anyway, Greg crossing out 3 black senatorial candidates is proof that he and the black liberal Khive gang don’t actually want to elevate black voices but in reality want to elevate neoliberalism and think that using black voters as a shield is a good way to do so.

Either way, I guess it also shows that these idiots meant “vote blue no matter who” as “vote for shitty moderate democrats who no one likes because they won’t change anything” because when these guys have to vote for Dems to the left of Nancy Pelosi, they always flip out.

Mostly concerned with the US. Just kinda getting this off my chest, but I am so goddamn disappointed in how many of us are still chasing the Democratic carrot on a stick and compromising our souls for it. I've seen in real time how political discourse among trans people has been swerved dead into the center right, directly back into the welcoming arms of the capitalist meatpuppets who threw us into the lions' den when they botched 2024. "Trans rights are human rights" has turned into "There are bigger issues at hand", "Protect trans kids" (Ugh...) into "At least <Dem who openly hates trans kids> is better than <Rep who also openly hates trans kids>", and even "No trans genocide" into "Trans genocide but slower." I wish I was making the shit up, but that's where the bar seems to be for much of us now. If this is the best we can do, why don't we just roll over and fucking die? The gay liberation movement could have actually changed everything, queer people forging their own destiny and liberty in unwavering revolutionary spirit. Why did we allow the liberal elite to gut it and make it into another piece for their political games? All for the illusion of expedient progress and the commodification of our very identities. If we don't make up for the work lost, we are cooked!

French highschooler educating an adult

Just know this woman had so little confidence in winning her competitive redrawn district that she decided to run in a D+40 majority black district so she could win the primary on name recognition and have a smooth run in the general. Probably one of the most detestable democrats still around.

Of course, with this tweet, she either didn’t read it and just assumed he would not condemn Hamas, or she did read it, knew he condemned Hamas, and wanted an excuse to bash a progressive Democrat because he doesn’t love Israel like she does.

Al Franken especally, but even Graham Plattner. I hate SA, but this is making me fucking insane.

Share your comments and thoughts down below.

EU to lift sanctions on Russian oligarchs Usmanov, Fridman
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/
20260922-eu-fails-to-agree-on-lifting-sanctions-on-russian-oligarchs

EU is also buying record amounts of gas from russia.

Even politicians who have had scandals due to being involved with russian oligarch money schemes simultaneously use regular russian emigrees as punching bags to win brownie points and to distract trom their own involvement with Putin's war machine

-

Here is the news on the assasination of anti-war russian artist from the clip
https://www.dw.com/en/semyon-skrepetsky-
russian-artist-putin-critic-killed-poland/ a-77576814

I think it’s pretty fair to say that Jasmine Crockett may be one of the most controversial democrats amongst the party, and that’s not an exaggeration. She’s already had a spotty reputation, but this past month has especially been bad for her. 

Crockett was a pretty well liked figure in the party until around… I’d say December of 2025 when she half assedly ran for Texas senate and lost to James Talarico. She accused his campaign of being racist and while yes, there was racism directed at her, James Talarico never endorsed it, not to mention the worst racism she receives is from republicans anyway. She also talked about the "mediocre black man comments” and said they were true… Talarico did call Alred mediocre but never implied it was because he was black. 

She lost of course, and then she endorsed Talarico… kind of. Yes, she did congratulate him, but it’s clear she didn’t directly endorse him and she reiterated she wouldn’t campaign for him. Now, I know this will make some mad, but I don’t think she has to campaign with him. It’s her choice and I don’t think Talarico needs her to win. That being said, Crockett’s conduct has been… less than ideal. 

Ultimately, she had been going on various podcasts and said she wouldn’t campaign for Talarico because she didn’t think he’d win because of the money and how spending goes. This is possibly true, and it’s not like Talarico winning is certain in any way. That being said, it’s easy to say that her “reverse down ballot strategy” feels like a way to “do something” while avoiding campaigning with him. Of course, Talarico, because he doesn’t want to get in conflict, has said Crockett has done “more than enough” which is fine I guess. 

However, it’s pretty clear that Crockett has gotten a far worse reputation due to actions a few weeks ago when she decided to honor Chris Brown… and yeah, this made me lose any sort of respect I had for her. For those who don’t know, Chris brown is a piece of garbage who has assaulted several woman, as noted by Hana. Not just Rihana, but several others. And yet Crockett decided to honor him for some reason, which is disgusting and hypocritical. 

Again, if her whole thing for not endorsing Talarico was due to problems you may have had with possible racism and her not thinking he could win, fine. But why would she do this then? Aren’t you still in congress? And shouldn’t you be looking this stuff anyway? Either she doesn’t know what Chris Brown did, or she doesn’t care. This honestly makes it clear that the ethical concerns she had about Talarico may have not really mattered and it’s more of a grudge. 

And of course Crockett’s stans, the ones who think Talarico is a racist, all defended her and acted like Chris brown is some great representative of the black community or she had to do it, when she didn’t. And no, Chris brown selling venues doesn’t make it good she endorsed him either. I am pleasantly surprised however, that Reese and Shannon watts criticized her over this though. The other moderate Dems defended her just because I guess owning leftists is more important than actually caring about abuse. 

But you thought THAT was it? Well, for those who don’t know, Crockett’s Fire PAC has been doing endorsements, and two specific people were missing. Talarico and Gina Hinojosa who’s running for governor. Now, Crockett said she’d just do a “down ballot” strategy with fire pac, which, is fine I guess. But, there were some holes with this since the fire pac has endorsed candidates from CALIFORNIA!! Again, if this was truly about Texas’s down ballot, why is Crockett’s PAC endorsing the Gubernatorial candidate for California and not the one of her own state? I can kind of accept Talarico not being endorsed by the PAC if the “down ballot” thing is true and she considers the gubernatorial races down ballot, which they usually aren’t in midterm years, but why not Hinojosa who Crockett hasn’t even verbally endorsed and who is running for the same position as Becerra and likely needs the endorsement far more? 

Crockett could’ve easily addressed it, and could’ve cleared it up, but did she? Nope! Instead she brought up her tweet endorsing Talarico in March and said “HERE, HAPPY NOW!?” and didn’t address anything. She just lashed out at her critics and that’s it, and didn’t seem to say shit about Hinojosa at all. And while it’s true that talking about Crockett more than Paxton is foolish, her attitude here is why she’s getting negative attention to herself. It’s not journalists fault that you can’t explain things properly. 

And even worse she outright said she would only accept endorsements for applications. Maybe this is normal, but I do have to wonder why you would reveal this openly. I could understand for a primary, but why does an application need to be filed to endorse the only democratic governor candidate? Also, we can walk and chew gum, Jasmine. We can talk about Ken Paxton and also talk about how you are withholding endorsements for important candidates for senate and governor. Sure Paxton should be talked about more, but that doesn’t mean you can’t be talked about. 

Well, as it turns out that Crockett has gotten into more hot water and of course, it’s for lobbying services. And she seems to know how bad of a look it is since it’s suspiciously been off of her website. I wonder why that could be? Could it be because it doesn’t look good? I guess this is proof she is really just done serving in electoral politics and she doesn’t seem to want to have anyone know she’s a consultant. 

So yeah, this is how Jasmine crockett’s reputation fell in the matter of a year and it’s mostly her fault. I do think she has been a victim of racism to some degree, but a lot of the issues with her come down to her own actions, especially regarding Chris brown. 

Sources: 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/many-black-people-fear-jasmine-233501309.html

https://www.tmz.com/2026/09/13/jasmine-crockett-chris-brown-usher-congressional-record/

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/6058356-crockett-down-ballot-texas-senate/amp/

https://zeteo.com/p/jasmine-crockett-offered-lobbying

https://www.thefirepac.com/endorsements

https://newrepublic.com/post/216164/jasmine-crockett-lobbying-services-campaign-website

Tad Stoermer did a video debunking an oft-made argument used by Liberals who argue that Hitler’s rise came about due to there being too many leftists parties, which kept the left from presenting a united front against the fascists.

How ironic that this dude was seen as the democratic kingmaker and now he’s been thoroughly exposed for being the charlatan he is. He’s acting like he cares about countering Trump and now he’s basically given half of the media ecosystem to maga billionaires. This man is a coward and a corrupt imbecile.

Basically, this deal is a complete joke. Paramount remains in California… that’s really it. The other “concessions” are things that they may not even do, and even worse, Trump will probably protect paramount if they don’t follow them anyway. And now, the protections for shows and networks that we thought could be here won’t come and so what’s next? Thousands of workers will be laid off and forced to find new work. And even with the assurances this won’t happen, we know this won’t be honored.

So this asshat wanted to be elected by being as “moderate as possible” but didn’t realize that you need to answer to your own party first, and hopefully, he won’t get away with this garbage. Since he’s a snake, Newsom will act like he’s a hero if he becomes president and breaks up this deal that shouldn’t have ever happened.

Of course meanwhile, none of the Twitter shitlibs are taking any actual strides against this and are instead being mad at Mamdani for meeting with Trump in spite of the clearly different contexts on display here.

https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/paramount-warner-bros-insiders-settlement-shock-layoffs-1236872225/